Xman wrote:Raiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:
2 million? That'd be a couple of NRL teams losses every year! The storm lose 6 times that every year

try 6.3 Million cockhead
and the Storm haven't lost a penny in 4 years ... you halfwit

They lost 2m douche, entirely due to greedy owners
Challenges, naturally, remain. The Power reported a loss of $2.1 million last season and are working feverishly to secure more financial support.
Read more:
http://www.theage.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/m ... z2K1UHeSGR
The storm fall short every year by 6 times that

who wrote that crap .... spewie ?
try the truth for once fuckstick
oh & the Storm
in the black in 2009... 2010..2011 & 2012
http://www.news.com.au/sport/AFL/port-a ... 6526658292
PORT Adelaide financial papers yesterday told another doleful story when an operating loss of $4.1million topped the 2011 season's by $1million dollars.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Recommended CoverageRelated Coverage .
Port must not risk Jurrah: Tredrea
VIDEO: CLUB great Warren Tredrea says Port Adelaide should abandon plans to draft Liam Jurrah... .
Vanstone joins Port board
FORMER Howard Government minister Amanda Vanstone has signed on as a director of Port Adelaide... .
Dogs' loss not all doom and gloom
THE Western Bulldogs have put a positive spin on an operating loss of $136,000 in 2012......End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
The turnover slipped, the crowd numbers dipped to below 20,000 for the first time since the club joined the AFL and corporate return was estimated to be down by about $600,000.
They was glum figures but the club is positive it has turned a corner in revitalising its brand with a new board and a new coaching group while it is on the doorstep of a shift to Adelaide Oval.
The news comes as senior football figures close to the SA football commission wondered why the grants from the AFL were not included in the reports - at least $1million - and feared the real financial damage was far worse.
Some feared the real loss could have been as bad as $6million.
But Port chief executive Keith Thomas said that under a new reporting system, the grants were rolled into the allocation afforded to all clubs, which seeks to compensate clubs for having a less lucrative schedule or not as many blockbuster games.
"It makes it really difficult to compare results from one year to the next," Thomas said. "It's the same for all clubs. But I think it's fair to say that we are $1million worse than last year and most of that is on football spending."
The club's membership is of concern, because while one set of numbers said the total amount of members were down as little as three per cent, income declined by around $250,000 with more members being on decreased packages.