"Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
So you don't think these clubs will invest anything into their football department with the extra cash? And what about the increased salary cap that they will have to cover? You're horribly delusional if you think all nRL clubs will post a profit. It's absurd to even think half the clubs of that amateur competition will even make a profit.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

this coming from a fan of a club that lost more dough in one year then ten NRL clubs would in 2 .... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
2 million? That'd be a couple of NRL teams losses every year! The storm lose 6 times that every year :lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Really, I couldn't give a stuff who makes money and who doesn't as long as it's controlled properly, if my club was losing as much as Porked Barrelled does, I'd be very worried. But my team even at their lowest don't lose money like that, nothing near it actually, so, I don't care.
If your team had a stadium deal like us then you would have been extinct a decade ago. A 28,000 breakeven is not viable. The AFL knows this, Port Adelaide knows this, but the fucksticks at the $NAFL insist it's best for football. #-o

Go figure.

every cent taken from poort crapshisdaks by the SANFL ..... was given back to them
every penny
yet they still posted an astounding loss ......

making the above cr@p exuse .... hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol:

poort powerfailure are a basket case
nothing to do with anything else :cool:
Last edited by Raiderdave on Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
So you don't think these clubs will invest anything into their football department with the extra cash? And what about the increased salary cap that they will have to cover? You're horribly delusional if you think all nRL clubs will post a profit. It's absurd to even think half the clubs of that amateur competition will even make a profit.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

this coming from a fan of a club that lost more dough in one year then ten NRL clubs would in 2 .... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
2 million? That'd be a couple of NRL teams losses every year! The storm lose 6 times that every year :lol:

try 6.3 Million cockhead :roll:

and the Storm haven't lost a penny in 4 years ... you halfwit :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

this coming from a fan of a club that lost more dough in one year then ten NRL clubs would in 2 .... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
2 million? That'd be a couple of NRL teams losses every year! The storm lose 6 times that every year :lol:

try 6.3 Million cockhead :roll:

and the Storm haven't lost a penny in 4 years ... you halfwit :lol: :lol: :lol:
They lost 2m douche, entirely due to greedy owners :roll:
Challenges, naturally, remain. The Power reported a loss of $2.1 million last season and are working feverishly to secure more financial support.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/m ... z2K1UHeSGR

The storm fall short every year by 6 times that :lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
2 million? That'd be a couple of NRL teams losses every year! The storm lose 6 times that every year :lol:

try 6.3 Million cockhead :roll:

and the Storm haven't lost a penny in 4 years ... you halfwit :lol: :lol: :lol:
They lost 2m douche, entirely due to greedy owners :roll:
Challenges, naturally, remain. The Power reported a loss of $2.1 million last season and are working feverishly to secure more financial support.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/m ... z2K1UHeSGR

The storm fall short every year by 6 times that :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
who wrote that crap .... spewie ? :lol: :lol: :lol:

try the truth for once fuckstick

oh & the Storm
in the black in 2009... 2010..2011 & 2012
:cool:

http://www.news.com.au/sport/AFL/port-a ... 6526658292
PORT Adelaide financial papers yesterday told another doleful story when an operating loss of $4.1million topped the 2011 season's by $1million dollars.
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
Recommended CoverageRelated Coverage .
Port must not risk Jurrah: Tredrea

VIDEO: CLUB great Warren Tredrea says Port Adelaide should abandon plans to draft Liam Jurrah... .
Vanstone joins Port board

FORMER Howard Government minister Amanda Vanstone has signed on as a director of Port Adelaide... .
Dogs' loss not all doom and gloom

THE Western Bulldogs have put a positive spin on an operating loss of $136,000 in 2012......End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.
The turnover slipped, the crowd numbers dipped to below 20,000 for the first time since the club joined the AFL and corporate return was estimated to be down by about $600,000.

They was glum figures but the club is positive it has turned a corner in revitalising its brand with a new board and a new coaching group while it is on the doorstep of a shift to Adelaide Oval.

The news comes as senior football figures close to the SA football commission wondered why the grants from the AFL were not included in the reports - at least $1million - and feared the real financial damage was far worse.

Some feared the real loss could have been as bad as $6million.
But Port chief executive Keith Thomas said that under a new reporting system, the grants were rolled into the allocation afforded to all clubs, which seeks to compensate clubs for having a less lucrative schedule or not as many blockbuster games.

"It makes it really difficult to compare results from one year to the next," Thomas said. "It's the same for all clubs. But I think it's fair to say that we are $1million worse than last year and most of that is on football spending."

The club's membership is of concern, because while one set of numbers said the total amount of members were down as little as three per cent, income declined by around $250,000 with more members being on decreased packages.
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Xman »

:lol: :lol:

Some feared.......

That's your source... :lol: :lol: :lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Stewie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
Really, I couldn't give a stuff who makes money and who doesn't as long as it's controlled properly, if my club was losing as much as Porked Barrelled does, I'd be very worried. But my team even at their lowest don't lose money like that, nothing near it actually, so, I don't care.
If your team had a stadium deal like us then you would have been extinct a decade ago. A 28,000 breakeven is not viable. The AFL knows this, Port Adelaide knows this, but the fucksticks at the $NAFL insist it's best for football. #-o

Go figure.

every cent taken from poort crapshisdaks by the SANFL ..... was given back to them
every penny
yet they still posted an astounding loss ......

making the above cr@p exuse .... hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol:

poort powerfailure are a basket case
nothing to do with anything else :cool:
You are an idiot. Every penny the $NAFL made from Port Adelaide in 143 years hey? Dumbarse. They have made tens of millions off us since we were promoted into the AFL, and only in the last few years have we had to ask for some money back because the current stadium agreement is the worst in the AFL. Get educated on the subject or just fuck off you waste of flesh.
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
If your team had a stadium deal like us then you would have been extinct a decade ago. A 28,000 breakeven is not viable. The AFL knows this, Port Adelaide knows this, but the fucksticks at the $NAFL insist it's best for football. #-o

Go figure.

every cent taken from poort crapshisdaks by the SANFL ..... was given back to them
every penny
yet they still posted an astounding loss ......

making the above cr@p exuse .... hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol:

poort powerfailure are a basket case
nothing to do with anything else :cool:
You are an idiot. Every penny the $NAFL made from Port Adelaide in 143 years hey? Dumbarse. They have made tens of millions off us since we were promoted into the AFL, and only in the last few years have we had to ask for some money back because the current stadium agreement is the worst in the AFL. Get educated on the subject or just fuck off you waste of flesh.

every penny returned
Poort can'tpaytherent ..... financial ********* :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Stewie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

every cent taken from poort crapshisdaks by the SANFL ..... was given back to them
every penny
yet they still posted an astounding loss ......

making the above cr@p exuse .... hilarious :lol: :lol: :lol:

poort powerfailure are a basket case
nothing to do with anything else :cool:
You are an idiot. Every penny the $NAFL made from Port Adelaide in 143 years hey? Dumbarse. They have made tens of millions off us since we were promoted into the AFL, and only in the last few years have we had to ask for some money back because the current stadium agreement is the worst in the AFL. Get educated on the subject or just fuck off you waste of flesh.

every penny returned
Poort can'tpaytherent ..... financial ********* :lol: :lol: :lol:
Prove it.
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
:lol: :lol:

Some feared.......

That's your source... :lol: :lol: :lol:
a news article stating they lost 6 Million plus
its a more then legit source you knob molestor :cool:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Raiderdave »

Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
You are an idiot. Every penny the $NAFL made from Port Adelaide in 143 years hey? Dumbarse. They have made tens of millions off us since we were promoted into the AFL, and only in the last few years have we had to ask for some money back because the current stadium agreement is the worst in the AFL. Get educated on the subject or just fuck off you waste of flesh.

Poort can'tpaytherent ..... financial ********* :lol: :lol: :lol:
Prove it.

prove poort .. pennyless are financial ********* eh

gee :-k

I'd of thought a 6.3 Million loss in 2012 more then did this ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
:lol: :lol:

Some feared.......

That's your source... :lol: :lol: :lol:
a news article stating they lost 6 Million plus
its a more then legit source you knob molestor :cool:
:lol:

Your source says "Some feared the real loss could have been as bad as $6million."

:lol: :lol:

The Age quoted the official financial report. Your source is an opinion! :lol:
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Stewie
Coach
Coach
Posts: 2771
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:03 pm
Team: Port Adelaide Football Club
Location:
Has thanked: 0
Been liked: 0

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by Stewie »

Raiderdave wrote:
Stewie wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

Poort can'tpaytherent ..... financial ********* :lol: :lol: :lol:
Prove it.

prove poort .. pennyless are financial ********* eh

gee :-k

I'd of thought a 6.3 Million loss in 2012 more then did this ?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Prove that all the money that the $NAFL made off of Port went back to Port. Go one, prove it.

Better yet shut the fuck up you minda.
Raiderdave wrote:

7K is a tremendous turnout
Image
ParraEelsNRL
Coach
Coach
Posts: 9495
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
Team: Parramatta
Location: Rugby League Heartland
Has thanked: 14 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: "Pride of the League" = "horrible investment"

Post by ParraEelsNRL »

Ffs, we have guys here asking for proof that the NRL is giving money outside the cap to clubs yet these guys here don't believe us.

Hmmm, didn't all you drongos say ch9 was stuffed and the promised money (guarantee before 2013) would not turn up, remember that?

Remember the $500,000 each team got as soon as ch9 signed on the dotted line, that was the part of the early payment?
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 10 guests