Great song though.King-Eliagh wrote: Wed Nov 22, 2017 10:57 pmHere we go, this stoopid ritual of port fans singing love songs before a full contact sport begins has only been around a few years.
Id say the crowd gender percentages have barely changed since fev was a rookie..
Thanks for coming sport capital but it's another fail for you in this thread. 50/50 indeed. It's not close and it's not "half the population" you silly silly man![]()
Is rugby just mma?
- SportCapital
- Coach
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:08 pm
- Team: Melbourne Storm-Essendon Bombers-Melbourne Victory
- Location: The Sport Capital
Re: Is rugby just mma?
- SportCapital
- Coach
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:08 pm
- Team: Melbourne Storm-Essendon Bombers-Melbourne Victory
- Location: The Sport Capital
Re: Is rugby just mma?
It's a couple years old, but seems credible. Please note the figures quoted.
First few paragraphs.
Female fans are AFL’s secret weapon in drawing crowds
May 8, 2015 10.43am AEST
Author
Tony Ward
Fellow in Historical Studies, University of Melbourne
Disclosure statement
Tony Ward does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Partners
University of Melbourne
University of Melbourne provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation AU.
Victoria State Government
Victoria State Government provides funding as a strategic partner of The Conversation AU.
View current jobs from University of Melbourne
View all partners
Republish this article
Republish Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.
The AFL does best in attracting young women to games and then maintaining their loyalty in later years. AAP/David Mariuz
Email
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Print
The recent Anzac Day football matches attracted big crowds. More than 114,000 people attended NRL matches in five cities. In the AFL, 88,000 braved wet weather for one match alone – the MCG tussle between Collingwood and Essendon.
Compared with football stadiums worldwide, Australian fans have long stood out from the crowd. On a couple of key things. One is the mixing of fans from the contesting clubs through the ground. A second is a remarkably higher attendance by women.
Many football games overseas play in front of overwhelmingly male audiences. Here, women form 40% of a typical footy crowd – somewhat higher for Australian rules football, slightly lower for rugby league.
Full story - http://theconversation.com/female-fans- ... owds-41173
First few paragraphs.
Female fans are AFL’s secret weapon in drawing crowds
May 8, 2015 10.43am AEST
Author
Tony Ward
Fellow in Historical Studies, University of Melbourne
Disclosure statement
Tony Ward does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Partners
University of Melbourne
University of Melbourne provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation AU.
Victoria State Government
Victoria State Government provides funding as a strategic partner of The Conversation AU.
View current jobs from University of Melbourne
View all partners
Republish this article
Republish Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.
The AFL does best in attracting young women to games and then maintaining their loyalty in later years. AAP/David Mariuz
The recent Anzac Day football matches attracted big crowds. More than 114,000 people attended NRL matches in five cities. In the AFL, 88,000 braved wet weather for one match alone – the MCG tussle between Collingwood and Essendon.
Compared with football stadiums worldwide, Australian fans have long stood out from the crowd. On a couple of key things. One is the mixing of fans from the contesting clubs through the ground. A second is a remarkably higher attendance by women.
Many football games overseas play in front of overwhelmingly male audiences. Here, women form 40% of a typical footy crowd – somewhat higher for Australian rules football, slightly lower for rugby league.
Full story - http://theconversation.com/female-fans- ... owds-41173
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Last years gf in Melb good enough for ya?

at least triple the number of people than ur crumby pic 




xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- SportCapital
- Coach
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:08 pm
- Team: Melbourne Storm-Essendon Bombers-Melbourne Victory
- Location: The Sport Capital
Re: Is rugby just mma?
"somewhat higher for Australian rules football"
Higher than what you ask?
40%
Somewhat higher than 40% of Aussie rules crowds are women.
That's fucking close to 50/50 don't you think?
I'l let you digest that for the night. Tootles
Higher than what you ask?
40%
Somewhat higher than 40% of Aussie rules crowds are women.
That's fucking close to 50/50 don't you think?
I'l let you digest that for the night. Tootles
Re: Is rugby just mma?
You know aflcrap will discredit either 1. The article. 2. The author or 3. Where it was published.... possibly all three lol. Wait for it. You posted something, he asked for evidence, you give this, and he will say it’s not good enough. Wait fit it. Oh yeah... and will pick one thing from this post to have a go atcwithout addressung the actual point/meaning behind post. It’s classic crapper. Hey ... try asking him to say one positive thing about the AFL....
Veni, vidi, vici
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Wow Im definitely living in your head Fred .Fred wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:02 amYou know aflcrap will discredit either 1. The article. 2. The author or 3. Where it was published.... possibly all three lol. Wait for it. You posted something, he asked for evidence, you give this, and he will say it’s not good enough. Wait fit it. Oh yeah... and will pick one thing from this post to have a go atcwithout addressung the actual point/meaning behind post. It’s classic crapper. Hey ... try asking him to say one positive thing about the AFL....
Lol
& yes the article is sus
Simply because it's by a Melb local
A VIctorian .
& as seen when they write about anything to do with the state they tend to be biased
He says 40% for AFL
RL SLIGHTLY lower ..what is slightly ?
& that makes a mockery of sports bullshitter saying almost 50/50 & no other LEAGUE COMES CLOSE .
You fumblers are so far removed from reality it's comical .
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is rugby just mma?

Aflcrap seems to be on the money here. I've been to many AFL games in Melbourne and I can tell ya, the crowds are nowhere near 50/50. Just look at the images of crowds and you'll see. Then there's the article sportscapital provudes. It's vague, doesn't come from a reputable org or tell us where the figures come from and I recall Australia's leading market research org Roy Morgan citing something like 30% of Aussie rules supporters were women and that this number was declining.

Sportscapital - he tries hard, we must give him that


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Bahahahahahaha!AFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:47 amWow Im definitely living in your head Fred .Fred wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:02 amYou know aflcrap will discredit either 1. The article. 2. The author or 3. Where it was published.... possibly all three lol. Wait for it. You posted something, he asked for evidence, you give this, and he will say it’s not good enough. Wait fit it. Oh yeah... and will pick one thing from this post to have a go atcwithout addressung the actual point/meaning behind post. It’s classic crapper. Hey ... try asking him to say one positive thing about the AFL....
Lol
& yes the article is sus
Simply because it's by a Melb local
A VIctorian .
& as seen when they write about anything to do with the state they tend to be biased
He says 40% for AFL
RL SLIGHTLY lower ..what is slightly ?
& that makes a mockery of sports bullshitter saying almost 50/50 & no other LEAGUE COMES CLOSE .
You fumblers are so far removed from reality it's comical .
Your just a fruit loop who thinks you are
Same dribblenand conspiracies that you usually trot out!
If it suit your argument it’s a credible source if it doesn’t it’s not a credible source
Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
Re: Is rugby just mma?
King-Eliagh wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:08 pm
Aflcrap seems to be on the money here. I've been to many AFL games in Melbourne and I can tell ya, the crowds are nowhere near 50/50. Just look at the images of crowds and you'll see. Then there's the article sportscapital provudes. It's vague, doesn't come from a reputable org or tell us where the figures come from and I recall Australia's leading market research org Roy Morgan citing something like 30% of Aussie rules supporters were women and that this number was declining.
Sportscapital - he tries hard, we must give him that![]()



Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
- leagueiscrap
- Banned
- Posts: 7862
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:08 am
- Team: Essendon
- Location:
Re: Is rugby just mma?
King-Eliagh wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:08 pm
Aflcrap seems to be on the money here. I've been to many AFL games in Melbourne and I can tell ya, the crowds are nowhere near 50/50. Just look at the images of crowds and you'll see. Then there's the article sportscapital provudes. It's vague, doesn't come from a reputable org or tell us where the figures come from and I recall Australia's leading market research org Roy Morgan citing something like 30% of Aussie rules supporters were women and that this number was declining.
Sportscapital - he tries hard, we must give him that![]()



Australian sporting sponsorship
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
AFL excess of $50m
A league $30 million plus
ARU $27 million
NRLOL $25 million
Leagueiscrap
and she still changes your nappies as well!
pusseycat replys
Only when I have an accident.
Re: Is rugby just mma?
See... right on cue... even when I point out his tactics he can’t help himselfAFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:47 amWow Im definitely living in your head Fred .Fred wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:02 amYou know aflcrap will discredit either 1. The article. 2. The author or 3. Where it was published.... possibly all three lol. Wait for it. You posted something, he asked for evidence, you give this, and he will say it’s not good enough. Wait fit it. Oh yeah... and will pick one thing from this post to have a go atcwithout addressung the actual point/meaning behind post. It’s classic crapper. Hey ... try asking him to say one positive thing about the AFL....
Lol
& yes the article is sus
Simply because it's by a Melb local
A VIctorian .
& as seen when they write about anything to do with the state they tend to be biased
He says 40% for AFL
RL SLIGHTLY lower ..what is slightly ?
& that makes a mockery of sports bullshitter saying almost 50/50 & no other LEAGUE COMES CLOSE .
You fumblers are so far removed from reality it's comical .

Veni, vidi, vici
Re: Is rugby just mma?
Lol
Nice to know if I ever become homeless I have plenty of space in your head .
I'm living there already .
Nice to know if I ever become homeless I have plenty of space in your head .
I'm living there already .
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: Is rugby just mma?


Ok now I think it's time we got this thread back on track after some AFL supporting douchebag decided to bring up the topic of AFL crowds in a thread about NRL..how unusual. Surprise surprise!

So whilst buzz has been effectively imprisoned to the 'from the outer' board



So the thread topic, is rugby league just mma? Well no but in the past two decades the game has been spoils somewhat by teams like the melbourne Storm and their coach who will look for any avenue, however outside the unwritten agreements of the code, to win.. So I'm pretty sure it was that dickhead Bellamy who originally thought he'd support teaching his players wrestling techniques to slow the play the ball down. What a wander, now we have a multitude of new rules that means refs blow their whistles more. All because Bellamy couldn't get his team to win on rugby league skills alone, he had to look into more mma type skills. If it was him who started it, What a fukkin walker that Bellamy is, a disgrace to the code.
And for once I might've had a chance to give buzz a tiny bit of credit. But alas he's locked up! And I don't think he'll be back. But please, visit him 'from the outer'


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- SportCapital
- Coach
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:08 pm
- Team: Melbourne Storm-Essendon Bombers-Melbourne Victory
- Location: The Sport Capital
Re: Is rugby just mma?
So underwhelmingly predictable.Fred wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 12:34 pmSee... right on cue... even when I point out his tactics he can’t help himselfAFLcrap1 wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 9:47 amWow Im definitely living in your head Fred .Fred wrote: Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:02 amYou know aflcrap will discredit either 1. The article. 2. The author or 3. Where it was published.... possibly all three lol. Wait for it. You posted something, he asked for evidence, you give this, and he will say it’s not good enough. Wait fit it. Oh yeah... and will pick one thing from this post to have a go atcwithout addressung the actual point/meaning behind post. It’s classic crapper. Hey ... try asking him to say one positive thing about the AFL....
Lol
& yes the article is sus
Simply because it's by a Melb local
A VIctorian .
& as seen when they write about anything to do with the state they tend to be biased
He says 40% for AFL
RL SLIGHTLY lower ..what is slightly ?
& that makes a mockery of sports bullshitter saying almost 50/50 & no other LEAGUE COMES CLOSE .
You fumblers are so far removed from reality it's comical ..
You called bullshit on a post of mine about my opinion, defending the appeal of AFL physiques to the fairer sex.
I proved my point with evidence. From a credible source. With a disclaimer. And the author, he's a PHD fellow at Melbourne Uni. Not some up start journo looking for a headline.
Do you even know what having a fellowship means, Hmmm?
What do you retort with:
Constant misquoting: A sign of weakness in arguments.
Opinion: Good for starting arguments, very hard to win one with.
Insults: Another sign of weakness in arguments. And a reflection on your character.
Assumptions: Basically guesses, with no circumstantial evidence.
And my fave, a pic from possibly last century. Fuck that was funny! Thanks KE!
Essentially nothing of substance!
This's isn't the school yard lads.
You called me out.
I smashed you both.
Ball's in your court.