plus ad free foxtelRaiderdave wrote:Xman wrote:They have more members and average crowds than any Sydney sporting club, and have for years. Deal with it.King-Eliagh wrote:Yes it can look like the swannies have, as cos lettuce says, 'made it'. But unfortunately cos lettuce lives in the most isolated bubble of a city in the world, perthFact of the matter is the swannies have about 8k solid supporter base in a city of close on 5 million. The other 20k of their supporter base/avg are what is commonly termed "the chardonnay set". The folk who dont give two skid marks about the game, dont understand it, and never will. It's something for them to do on the weekend. A sport for these 20k imbeciles to yell out "comon ref" in front of girlfriends who are none the wiser
Yep, I've seen it, these facts, too many times. But cos lettuce i can see that from the perspective of one from an isolated small time, small city like perth that you're everyday imbecile like yourself could percieve that sydney swans have "made it"
But in reality the poor club is relying on superficial pretentious twats
![]()
![]()
Just tellin the Truth,
KE
"Relocation, definitely not," Davison said.
http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/nrl ... 6594341253"I don't believe it is the way to go. And I am not picking on Cronulla. Sydney clubs have so much history and heritage. There is a second-tier competition. That's where Newtown play."
The NRL must have 16 clubs to fulfil its eight-game-a-week commitment to Channel 9 and Fox Sports. Southeast Queensland is almost certain to win a place if the NRL expands in three to four years.
But the chance remains that an existing club is relocated, as is commonplace in US sports, and as happened with the now hugely successful Sydney Swans in the AFL.
![]()
![]()
![]()
hugely succesful![]()
![]()
![]()
they can barely get 50K people ... out of 5 million to watch them on TV
yeah thats huge alright
a huge embarrasment![]()
![]()

80-120k and not even on the primary digital channel =D> =D> =D>