AFL 2019 Alert: Low Scoring BOGS

[King-Eliagh]

[King-Eliagh]

Lol KE educating the poor uneducated southern folk . .
You should get paid for doing it or is it because you're just a Good Samaritan ?

Whenever I can I just try to help those in need.

It’s rewarding but it would be nice to receive a thankyou every now and then tho.

Nlol? A lil thanks?

[NlolRL]

Ok nlol, seeing as I’ve proven you’ve failed abysmally and provided a completely invalid conclusion, I’m gunna teach you how to use an equation to make a valid conclusion when comparing two different things ie AFL and nrl blowouts.

Listen closely now because the maths I’m gunna teach you is above year five level it’s called algebra

Now what you’re gunna have to do to determine blowouts across the code is first agree on a relative time of the match to begin measurement. Let’s use three quarter time in the AFL and it’s equivalent in nrl. I think we can all agree that if, after three quarters of footy in both codes, that a team has pretty much Buckley’s chances of coming back then it’s fair enough to call it a blowout if that team doesn’t really make a dent or gets thrashed by even more at f/t.

So Before I go further and explain to you how we can measure the AFL or (x) versus the nrl or (y) I need to be sure you’re with me at this point. Cause, god forbid, I’m not about to explain and teach this to someone incapable of understanding.

I disagree. If a side hasnt scored more than 1 try up until 3/4 time they may have the potential to score 1 or 2 in the last quarter but that means stuff all if they havent to that point.

In soccer a 3-0 scoreline should be seen as one-sided, but of course 3 goals COULD be scored in 3 minutes. But to suggest the game is still on the line with 20 minutes to go is pure BS. The games are low scoring for a reason, because it's highly unlikely they will score that in a short space of time

Fail......

can you re-read and re-post something that makes sense? you didnt even wait for my calculations to decipher what the actual chances are of a team coming back from whatever deficit at three quarter time.

But in any case it appears you are understanding that it is difficult to compare apples and oranges and that your attempt was a mammoth fail. So well done on that front nlol

Now lemme explain how i decipher a blowout for an individual code like AFL.

Firstly i use my experience as a player and viewer of the game. I know exactly what a blowout is but to prove it i need to use a bit of simple maths.

Firstly i take a score i know to be difficult to overcome. Let’s say a five goal lead at three quarter time. To validate this hypothesis i then go back and look at recent games (a bare minimum of 10) in the AFL where teams were behind by five goals at three quarter time. I then assess how many of those teams were able to come back from this deficit. If its say one out of twenty we can say that, from the data gathered, there’s a very small five percent chance of the comeback. Then to assess actual blowouts i would look at the games where teams are five goals or more down at three quarter time and, if a team is unable to gain more than one goal in the final quarter we can safely say that that game was pretty bloody boring for a significant portion of the game ie a lopsided, a blowout etc.

This is how i do it for AFL, based on real experience and valid mathematical reasoning.

Now can you do the same for rugby league dear nlol? Then, and only then, will we get somewhere in comparing. I’m happy to assist you with an initial experience based benchmark for the NRL re what is a very difficult score to come back from at the 60minute mark. Save you some time you know

If you've got a valid method with figures then provide them. The last 10 games isnt a decent sample. I provided figures for the last 50 games

I've only asked numerous times....

[King-Eliagh]

I already provided them in another’s thread. Do keep up nlol, I’ve also already rubbished the validity of your crumby figures. You completely wasted ur time presenting them and, in your previous post you even demonstrated their invalidity

So probably best not to refer to your crumby research...ever again

[King-Eliagh]

I’ll provide more data as things progress. Don’t you worry. In the mean time have another look at the opening post. You happy with the amount of low scoring teams this season so far? And all these low scoring teams and lopsided matches whilst the AFL have spent a shitload on analysing and changing the rules to create higher scoring games

[NlolRL]

I already provided them in another’s thread. Do keep up nlol, I’ve also already rubbished the validity of your crumby figures. You completely wasted ur time presenting them and, in your previous post you even demonstrated their invalidity

So probably best not to refer to your crumby research...ever again

You didnt provide stats, you provided opinions. Feck off

[King-Eliagh]

Don’t lie nlol. I provided figures detailing that a very low percentage of AFL teams have come back from a three goal deficit with 17mins. I’ve also provided figures detailing how many teams have been unable to make 10 goals this season.

You’ve provided completely invalid differentials in a despo attempt to make the nrl look more lopsided than the AFL. I then smashed ur research as invalid. Then I taught you how you could develop something that’s valid.

That’s what’s happened here and look I understand you might be disappointed. Ur lil research got smashed and it was a waste of time. When ur emotions have settled and ur ready to make a contribution come back and do so. Till then, this is my thread and I suggest you take a lil rest, make a warm milo, relax and return when the clouds have settled. I’ll be providing weekly updates in here on the afls progress in their attempts at ... “equalisation”

[NlolRL]

Don’t lie nlol. I provided figures detailing that a very low percentage of AFL teams have come back from a three goal deficit with 17mins. I’ve also provided figures detailing how many teams have been unable to make 10 goals this season.

You’ve provided completely invalid differentials in a despo attempt to make the nrl look more lopsided than the AFL. I then smashed ur research as invalid. Then I taught you how you could develop something that’s valid.

That’s what’s happened here and look I understand you might be disappointed. Ur lil research got smashed and it was a waste of time. When ur emotions have settled and ur ready to make a contribution come back and do so. Till then, this is my thread and I suggest you take a lil rest, make a warm milo, relax and return when the clouds have settled. I’ll be providing weekly updates in here on the afls progress in their attempts at ... “equalisation”

I cant remember these figures. Please privide them again KE

[King-Eliagh]

I posted it in a discussion that was directly responding to you dear nlol. I’m afraid I don’t go running round after my pupils. You gotta fix the ol memory there or track back in one of the other threads inspired by the AFL Friday fizzer nlol. It was recent so you shouldn’t have much trouble.

But rest assured I will be doing more research on the topic soon for your and the members benefit so please, do stay tuned

[NlolRL]

I posted it in a discussion that was directly responding to you dear nlol. I’m afraid I don’t go running round after my pupils. You gotta fix the ol memory there or track back in one of the other threads inspired by the AFL Friday fizzer nlol. It was recent so you shouldn’t have much trouble.

But rest assured I will be doing more research on the topic soon for your and the members benefit so please, do stay tuned

This is YOUR thread KE. If you cant find your own data dont blame me

[King-Eliagh]

don’t you dare take that tone with me pupil! You’ll never learn until you respect those who know better than you. Pickup yer game! This is MY thread, I posted the data you are looking for in another thread that was directly in discussion with you. If you are suffering from dementia that’s ok but it’s not my problem. It’s not up to me to remind you. Please go and look for it again. Until then stop spamming my thread with ur useless posts.

Warm regards,
KING

[NlolRL]

don’t you dare take that tone with me pupil! You’ll never learn until you respect those who know better than you. Pickup yer game! This is MY thread, I posted the data you are looking for in another thread that was directly in discussion with you. If you are suffering from dementia that’s ok but it’s not my problem. It’s not up to me to remind you. Please go and look for it again. Until then stop spamming my thread with ur useless posts.

Warm regards,
KING

Im happy to continue this discussion but it wont be going much further without data.......

[King-Eliagh]

So thus far I think we can all agree, given the data from the first six rounds, that we can safely say that the afls new rules aiming at higher scoring and “equalisation” are, well, it’s not really working is it

[NlolRL]

So thus far I think we can all agree, given the data from the first six rounds, that we can safely say that the afls new rules aiming at higher scoring and “equalisation” are, well, it’s not really working is it

What data? I cant see any data

[King-Eliagh]

So thus far I think we can all agree, given the data from the first six rounds, that we can safely say that the afls new rules aiming at higher scoring and “equalisation” are, well, it’s not really working is it

What data? I cant see any data

Are you the full quid? Op has tabled data

I get a funny feeling we might be in for another bumper round of low scorers this week! Stay tuned folks