easy. Make it so simple that the only thing distinguishing the skills were minor accuracy errors. For example get your average A grade basketballer and an NBA pro to face off on free throws. Both should make 8 out of 10 easy. If the A grader hits 9 and the pro 8 this doesnt show the A grader is a better shot. It shows the test was too simple.AFLcrap1 wrote:How did a RL player beat a fumbler in a kicking challenge
If they really wanted to show the difference in kicking skill they should have made the players kick on the run and from outside 50 metres over players on the goal line. In fact from memory none of the non-AFL players could kick 50 metres but they counted the goals that rolled through. This just doesnt happen in set shots at goal.