AFLcrap1 wrote:cos789 wrote:You're fecking brain dead morons that cannot comprehend the simplest logic and so resort to irrelevant shyte trying to disguise your ineptitude.
You've been owned.
There's been NO fecking consparcy by any headmaster. He does what any headmaster does -provide sport within the confines of available resources.
The AFL supplies development officers to promote the game NOT any headmaster.
If the nrl spent some money maybe that might help you.
WHY are you avoiding my question..
Do you ever deal in facts?.
Going by what Dogs posted It is disgusting that other sports are not available.
Yet you defend that & go on a rant ,& posting shit that you made up .
It does not matter who supplies the DEV officers .
The AFL ones were invited by THE VIC HEAD.
Did he invite NRL DEV officers....MY guess would be prob not.
& now you are talking about if the NRL spends money..
Any proof they don't....or you made that up too to suit your argument.
If you pose a logiical question in English I will answer it.
The facts are very simple. I'll repeat it for you brain dead morons. Schools simply don't have the resources to cater for every sport.
In fact they have resources to deal only with the most popular sports.
For over a hundred years Australian Football has not been available in NSW schools.
HTF does dogs know that the AFL was invited? peering through the principle's office was he?
What it matter if he did invite the AFL because he thought he might get a response.
Do NSW schools invite the AFL.
Do schools invite the GAA, American Football, Hockey, Ice Hockey, Basketball, Netball, FFA, cricket, baseball, wrestling representitives........etc etc.
Fact. It's well known that the nrl don't spend their money on grassroots. How do we know? Because rl people complain.
Remember the Canberra incident and the early "battle" for WS articles.
FFS toughen up and get some perspective.
Dogs is an absolute tool because he cannot handle the fact that nobody is interested in his sport. TOUGH.
Nice try Cos.