2020 - NRL - Rugby League TV Ratings

[Beaussie]

NRL 9s Fox League

Raiders v Titans 193,000
Wests Tigers v Rabbitohs 192,000
Dragons v Sharks 183,000
Cowboys v Broncos 179,000
Bulldogs v Eels 171,000
Warriors v Knights 154,000
Storm v Sea Eagles 148,000
Panthers v Roosters 143,000
Warriors v Roosters 114,000
Broncos v Dragons 100,00

https://www.mediaweek.com.au/tv-ratings ... bruary-14/

[Terry]

NRL 9s Fox League

Raiders v Titans 193,000
Wests Tigers v Rabbitohs 192,000
Dragons v Sharks 183,000
Cowboys v Broncos 179,000
Bulldogs v Eels 171,000
Warriors v Knights 154,000
Storm v Sea Eagles 148,000
Panthers v Roosters 143,000
Warriors v Roosters 114,000
Broncos v Dragons 100,00

https://www.mediaweek.com.au/tv-ratings ... bruary-14/

Good numbers!!!!!!

[Fred]

Lol how longs a game.

[Fred]

I don’t think the incremental decline is inconspicuous . People timed in at the start .... dropped off. I’m thinking the same viewers are counted ... not individual viewers for each game. So as an advent we see numbers around 140000 average. Off the top of my head. Divided by what ... 3000? And that’s how many actual viewers .... . 50 set top boxes. Wonder how many in Perth lol.

[Beaussie]

NRL 9s Fox League

Final Cowboys v Dragons 201,000
Quarter Final 4 173,000
Quarter Final 3 173,000
Semi Final 1 172,000
Quarter Final 1 170,000
Broncos v Storm 167,000
Semi Final 2 167,000
Quarter Final 2 163,000
Sea Eagles v Cowboys 156,000
Titans v West Tigers 149,000
Rabbitohs v Raiders 134,000
Eels v Dragons 134,000
Dragons v Roosters 134,000
Broncos v Warriors 125,000
Sharks v Bulldogs 124,000
Roosters v Warriors 112,000
Knights v Panthers 105,000



NRLW 9s Fox League

Final Dragons v Broncos 170,000
Warriors v Dragons89,000
Roosters v Broncos 64,000

https://www.mediaweek.com.au/tv-ratings ... bruary-15/

[Terry]

I don’t think the incremental decline is inconspicuous . People timed in at the start .... dropped off. I’m thinking the same viewers are counted ... not individual viewers for each game. So as an advent we see numbers around 140000 average. Off the top of my head. Divided by what ... 3000? And that’s how many actual viewers .... . 50 set top boxes. Wonder how many in Perth lol.

Ah Freddy, your expert analysis is priceless pal lololololololol!!!!! Can someone decipher this post and let me know what it means lololololol!!!!!

[Terry]

hes saying the same people watched every game and shouldnt be counted as individual viewers for every game.

Thanks pal. I sorta worked that out. The thing is mediaweek is where I got the numbers so Freddy might wanna take up their reporting method with them. Unless and until they change it that's the numbers we go with. The rest of his post is opinion. Biased opinion.

[pussycat]

hes not wrong though, theres no way there isnt multiple double counts of viewers. We all know thats the case. Hell these matches are BARELY long enough to meet the 15 minute increments these are counted in.

and NRL ,AFL every Friday night.

A Match is a match no matter how zooper it is.

[Terry]

hes not wrong though, theres no way there isnt multiple double counts of viewers. We all know thats the case. Hell these matches are BARELY long enough to meet the 15 minute increments these are counted in.

Yep. BARELY. But make it. So Mediaweek report it. Fact. Simple. Easy. If you and Fred don't like it either ignore the published ratings or get 'em to change their method. Fact. Simple. Easy!!!!!

[Fred]

I don’t particularly care to be honest. Just an observation and some discussion, as we have had. It’s really no big deal.

[Terry]

I don’t particularly care to be honest. Just an observation and some discussion, as we have had. It’s really no big deal.

Couldn't agree more Freddo. It's no big deal. And as long as mediaweek and the other ratings agencies report it so shall I.

[Terry]

Yep. BARELY. But make it. So Mediaweek report it. Fact. Simple. Easy. If you and Fred don't like it either ignore the published ratings or get 'em to change their method. Fact. Simple. Easy!!!!!

Yeah. and then we do that thing you hate most. Put it into context. It doesnt change the data at all, but it does put it in the proper frame. Not all ratings are created equally.

And as long as its legal for me to have a fucking opinion on something I will.

Exactly pal. And an opinion it was. And as long as its legal for me to state a fact I will!!!!

[Terry]

Yeah. and then we do that thing you hate most. Put it into context. It doesnt change the data at all, but it does put it in the proper frame. Not all ratings are created equally.

And as long as its legal for me to have a fucking opinion on something I will.

Exactly pal. And an opinion it was. And as long as its legal for me to state a fact I will!!!!

Is it a fact if its based on survey data though

What I'm referring to is the fact mediaweek published ratings numbers for each game. Which they did. The actual veracity or value of the numbers is open to interpretation.

I regularly question the overnight ratings numbers. Particularly as they seem to show many more people in Melbourne watch TV than in Sydney overall. Or is it the method used? Or where the ratings boxes are placed? Or how many boxes are actually out there? Or are the numbers actually accurate at all?

https://tvtonight.com.au/2020/02/sunday ... -2020.html

[leeroy*NRL*]

been like this for years, these figures,

Melbourne Metro out rating Sydney.
even going back 10 years ago was the same.

i recan the true measure of a result, is through platforms like KAYO
Streaming Minutes per program.

[Beaussie]

RUGBY LEAGUE ALL STARS -PRE MATCH Channel 9 204,000 177,000 6,000 8,000 7,000 5,000

RUGBY LEAGUE ALL STARS Channel 9 315,000 163,000 13,000 127,000 6,000 5,000

https://tvtonight.com.au/2020/02/saturd ... -2020.html


Rugby League All Stars game Nine/Gem
476,000 (Metro 315,000 Regional 161,000)


Rugby League All Stars: Fox League
Indigenous All Stars v Maori All Stars Men 158,000
Indigenous All Stars v Maori All Stars Women 45,000

https://www.mediaweek.com.au/tv-ratings ... bruary-21/