



Poor skills. You mean where people are actually able to catch a ball unlike AFL where they knock the ball on constantly lol..Fred wrote: Fri Mar 31, 2017 10:54 amWhat were they for last night ? I flicked over to the nrl game. To be honest I don't like the style of play that is on offer at the moment. As strange as it is, despite some poor skills, I did enjoy the women's games I watched. The pace of the men's game for me at present sees too many errors unless it is done to a high standard; which I think too many teams are trying but not up to it. I actually watched about 15 minutes of the nrl before flicking back to the footy.
picking and choosing would be selecting single rounds as isolated comparisons. Comparing every FTA prime time game for the year is completely fair.pussycat wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:54 amCommon Sense should tell you its about all games , Not just the ones you like to pick and choose!
The NRL annual report had the league's TV ratings up 14%. How far were the AFL's down?
They're comparable, but not as a measure of popularity when the schedules are so differentAFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:48 amOh my .
DENIAL ...lol it's a river in EGYPT.
Cumulative ratings are not comparable
On what fucking planet .
More people watched RL on TV than watched AFL ...deal with it .
Or keep but but but but butting ...lol it's hilarious .
Simply adding up all the ratings is silly as a measure.AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:48 amOh my .
DENIAL ...lol it's a river in EGYPT.
Cumulative ratings are not comparable
On what fucking planet .
More people watched RL on TV than watched AFL ...deal with it .
Or keep but but but but butting ...lol it's hilarious .
Yes. I agree with you on every point. You are a very intelligent man. How did you get so smart?????? How can I be so stupid??? Hail you oh great one!!!!!NlolRL wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:57 amThey're comparable, but not as a measure of popularity when the schedules are so differentAFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:48 amOh my .
DENIAL ...lol it's a river in EGYPT.
Cumulative ratings are not comparable
On what fucking planet .
More people watched RL on TV than watched AFL ...deal with it .
Or keep but but but but butting ...lol it's hilarious .
Yeah those people in regional areas just are'nt important enough to be counted apparentlyFred wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:37 amSimply adding up all the ratings is silly as a measure.AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:48 amOh my .
DENIAL ...lol it's a river in EGYPT.
Cumulative ratings are not comparable
On what fucking planet .
More people watched RL on TV than watched AFL ...deal with it .
Or keep but but but but butting ...lol it's hilarious .
thats not what he's saying. Maybe read the thread againNRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 1:40 pmYeah those people in regional areas just are'nt important enough to be counted apparentlyFred wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 11:37 amSimply adding up all the ratings is silly as a measure.AFLcrap1 wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:48 amOh my .
DENIAL ...lol it's a river in EGYPT.
Cumulative ratings are not comparable
On what fucking planet .
More people watched RL on TV than watched AFL ...deal with it .
Or keep but but but but butting ...lol it's hilarious .. That's like saying lets not count people in regional Australia when voting in an election.
Is pretty much what he's saying. Only counting ratings which suits his own argument. Maybe you need to read it again.NlolRL wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 2:03 pmthats not what he's saying. Maybe read the thread againNRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 1:40 pmYeah those people in regional areas just are'nt important enough to be counted apparently. That's like saying lets not count people in regional Australia when voting in an election.
How'd you come to that conclusion from what I wrote? My apologies if it come across that way but if you can show me where you thought I said that I will clarify or apologise as not what I was trying to convey.NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 3:09 pmIs pretty much what he's saying. Only counting ratings which suits his own argument. Maybe you need to read it again.NlolRL wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 2:03 pmthats not what he's saying. Maybe read the thread againNRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote: Sat Apr 01, 2017 1:40 pm
Yeah those people in regional areas just are'nt important enough to be counted apparently. That's like saying lets not count people in regional Australia when voting in an election.