Re: Rank the Codes in NSW
Posted: Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:42 pm
Lol
Just lol
Just lol
You're completely ignoring the perimeter of Giants stadium field is ~100 metres longer than Brookvales.Terry wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 12:34 pmWell pal you're wrong again. Brookvale oval record crowd is 27,655. Un-named stadium record crowd is 21,924. Brookvale's capacity is now capped at about 20k. Un-named stadium capacity is 24k. So your 'smaller crowd at a smaller venue' analogy is demonstrably incorrect.The_Wookie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:14 amGiven the long history of NRL number fudging...its far more likely that GWS numbers are just following a proven example, if indeed they are doing anything.AngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 9:10 am
Honestly, Brookvale & Cronulla were bigger. Gws number angloflicized.
Smaller crowd at a smaller venue is going to look bigger due to viewing perspectives.
No need to apologise pal. The bubble is a terrible thing!!!!!
Have a great day!!!!
Great pal. I can only imagine if you could possibly be any more stupid!!!! You're getting up there with village idiot level lunacy pal.SportCapital wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:25 pmYou're completely ignoring the perimeter of Giants stadium field is ~100 metres longer than Brookvales.Terry wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 12:34 pmWell pal you're wrong again. Brookvale oval record crowd is 27,655. Un-named stadium record crowd is 21,924. Brookvale's capacity is now capped at about 20k. Un-named stadium capacity is 24k. So your 'smaller crowd at a smaller venue' analogy is demonstrably incorrect.The_Wookie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:14 am
Given the long history of NRL number fudging...its far more likely that GWS numbers are just following a proven example, if indeed they are doing anything.
Smaller crowd at a smaller venue is going to look bigger due to viewing perspectives.
No need to apologise pal. The bubble is a terrible thing!!!!!
Have a great day!!!!
I can only imagine how much shitter NRL crowds would look if they were spread over an extra 100m of Grand stands.
Pal, you shoulda stopped at 'I didn't think this through". That represents just about everything fumblers say here.SportCapital wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:45 pmI didn't think this through too much.
There'd be no need to spread the crowds.
The NRL would just put more banners in the stands.
Coming from you pal that is disturbing!!!! I shall consider my position.The_Wookie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 11:21 pmmate have a day off or something, your starting to come off a little unhingedTerry wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 11:17 pmPal, you shoulda stopped at 'I didn't think this through". That represents just about everything fumblers say here.SportCapital wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 10:45 pmI didn't think this through too much.
There'd be no need to spread the crowds.
The NRL would just put more banners in the stands.
Good luck and all the best for the future!!
Soccer participation crushes everybody. Anglofl ratings in NSW are shit. Only thing to hold your hat on are live attendances & now your biggest fixture is failing.The_Wookie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 1:06 pmlol no it doesnt.AngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 8:54 am
That the biggest fixture on Sydney's AngloFL calendar gains so little fanfare, smashes argument of being a top 2 code.
so sokkas participation crushes every other code but has really shit ratings! go figureAngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:55 amSoccer participation crushes everybody. Anglofl ratings in NSW are shit. Only thing to hold your hat on are live attendances & now your biggest fixture is failing.The_Wookie wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 1:06 pmlol no it doesnt.AngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Sun Aug 04, 2019 8:54 am
That the biggest fixture on Sydney's AngloFL calendar gains so little fanfare, smashes argument of being a top 2 code.
1. Derby number at scg well down also.The_Wookie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 2:59 pm1. No fixture at the showgrounds is ever going to be the biggest. Capacity alone would tell you that even if sold out it still wont match the Swans AVERAGE crowd at the SCG dumbass.AngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:55 am
Soccer participation crushes everybody. Anglofl ratings in NSW are shit. Only thing to hold your hat on are live attendances & now your biggest fixture is failing.
2. Participation means fuck all at the professional level.
3. My hat hangs on attendance, revenue, sponsorship, tv ratings, membership etc etc.
Unlike the NRL, the AFL is more than just a tv show.
I did - I went back to original post;The_Wookie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 4:40 pm1. Not that low.AngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:25 pm1. Derby number at scg well down also.The_Wookie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 2:59 pm
1. No fixture at the showgrounds is ever going to be the biggest. Capacity alone would tell you that even if sold out it still wont match the Swans AVERAGE crowd at the SCG dumbass.
2. Participation means fuck all at the professional level.
3. My hat hangs on attendance, revenue, sponsorship, tv ratings, membership etc etc.
Unlike the NRL, the AFL is more than just a tv show.
2. Moving goal posts - just professional now, huh?
3. Anglofl ratings in NSW are shit. Membership numbers rubbish with 2 game deals & counting pets. Swans gain sponsorship because of eyeballs watching them, but majority of eyeballs interstate. Millions spent on gws, revenue can't match that.
2. Actually Ive said all along that at the professional level the AFL is number 2 - go back and read my friend.
3. Maybe the ratings are shit, but they are still better than soccers ratings in NSW. Membership numbers stand up against everyone elses membership number, sponsors are where you find them in national competitions, and the amount spent on the clubs is irrelevant in this equation.
Do some fucking research you twat.
Taking into account all relevant factors such as crowds, membership, sponsorship, tv ratings, media coverage, participation etc, etc, how would you rate and rank the codes in terms of popularity in NSW
ignore the strong football leagues all up the eastern seaboardAngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:08 amAnglofl is a niche pastime north of Beetson line - not widely played or supported. Millions have been poured into keeping gws afloat, while swans benefitted from cola forever. Don't mistake AngloFL investment for interest.
Again, new teams, clubs, leagues and competitions - so it is widely played. Sponsorship, memberships, advertising dollars..... crowds......AngloFootballLeague wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:08 amAnglofl is a niche pastime north of Beetson line - not widely played or supported. Millions have been poured into keeping gws afloat, while swans benefitted from cola forever. Don't mistake AngloFL investment for interest.