who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

docker24 · Post by **docker24** » Fri May 06, 2016 6:22 pm

Let's get this matter straight and cleared up...

Couple of rugby dry rooters on here (IMcrap1 & wussycat etc)

Use the term fumblers as their main point of argument against us Aussie rules fans.

I believe we have more reasons to use the term against you guys then you do.

Here's my case:

We all know a rugby ball is easier to handle then an AFL ball (difference in grip, weight and waterproof)

Speed also is a factor, as AFL balls travel at much faster speeds and go further distances.

Also don't forget that in most instances you're trying to catch an AFL ball against an opponent or a pack of people. Where as in NRL most of time there isn't as much pressure and/or contest.

Now from the above as you can see I believe that NRL fans should be called the real genuine fumbler

If you guys wish to contest my claim and statements that's fine open for discussion.

As for my fellow Aussie rules fans if there is anything you wish to add be my guest.

In closing, have a nice day real rugby fumblers

ParraEelsNRL · Post by **ParraEelsNRL** » Fri May 06, 2016 10:34 pm

Absolute Gold

leagueiscrap · Post by **leagueiscrap** » Fri May 06, 2016 10:40 pm

Its funny how with their rubber ball in the bum snuffing they struggle to catch a 5 meter throw!

League is a game for genuine retarrds!

docker24 · Post by **docker24** » Fri May 06, 2016 11:45 pm

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Absolute Gold

Ummm if you don't have anything valid to say then zip it.

Fumbler no1

AFLcrap1 · Post by **AFLcrap1** » Sat May 07, 2016 12:20 am

Lol
One game you are penalised for fumbling .
The other you're not .
Hence why a ball is fumbled continiously in fumbleball

The poor uncos even tried wearing gloves so they could catch .
Oh my

leagueiscrap · Post by **leagueiscrap** » Sat May 07, 2016 1:50 am

AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol
One game you are penalised for fumbling .
The other you're not .
Hence why a ball is fumbled continiously in fumbleball

The poor uncos even tried wearing gloves so they could catch .
Oh my

The AFL ball is leather not rubber, is travels at a much faster rate & usualu from a lot longer distance than 5 meters spazza!
League is simply rugby for retarrds!

Swans4ever · Post by **Swans4ever** » Sat May 07, 2016 7:43 am

It's funny the expression was used as s derogatory term - because in RL your not allowed to drop the ball - however most AF posters don't care as we don't get called bumsniffers- I know which one I prefer and it has nothing to do with placing my nose near another persons bum.

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sat May 07, 2016 8:04 am

AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol
One game you are penalised for fumbling .
The other you're not .
Hence why a ball is fumbled continiously in fumbleball

The poor uncos even tried wearing gloves so they could catch .
Oh my

Isnt fumbling permitted as long as the ball goes backwards ?

Maybe we should call RL backward fumbleball

AFLcrap1 · Post by **AFLcrap1** » Sat May 07, 2016 9:41 am

leagueiscrap wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol
One game you are penalised for fumbling .
The other you're not .
Hence why a ball is fumbled continiously in fumbleball

The poor uncos even tried wearing gloves so they could catch .
Oh my
The AFL ball is leather not rubber, is travels at a much faster rate & usualu from a lot longer distance than 5 meters spazza!
League is simply rugby for retarrds!

We need help to catch the ball .
A basic skill that 8 yr olds can master .

Xman · Post by **Xman** » Sat May 07, 2016 9:47 am

Yeah, those 1% of players who tried a glove then ditched it soon after was really telling.

Backwardball aka uncontested ball is about the easiest ball skill game on earth and has no right to point at other sports

leagueiscrap · Post by **leagueiscrap** » Sat May 07, 2016 3:55 pm

Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pre ... 6537371851

they only have to cach a 5 meter throw with a rubber ball

AFLcrap1 · Post by **AFLcrap1** » Sat May 07, 2016 4:28 pm

leagueiscrap wrote:
Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pre ... 6537371851

they only have to cach a 5 meter throw with a rubber ball

Lol a 3 yr old article . Nothing to do with the NRL just Some old bloke thinks players could wear gloves .

Keep grasping at straws

leagueiscrap · Post by **leagueiscrap** » Sat May 07, 2016 4:40 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pre ... 6537371851

they only have to cach a 5 meter throw with a rubber ball
Lol a 3 yr old article . Nothing to do with the NRL just Some old bloke thinks players could wear gloves .

Keep grasping at straws

lol like usual when it suits you youll use an article not from this week, when it doesnt, you mock it off! like usual selective hyprcrite fuckstick

"Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors"

they only have to catch the ball from a 5 meter throw

a rubber ball FFS then they fumble it several times, most the time they don't even have an opponent

Swans4ever · Post by **Swans4ever** » Sat May 07, 2016 9:46 pm

AFLcrap1 wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol
One game you are penalised for fumbling .
The other you're not .
Hence why a ball is fumbled continiously in fumbleball

The poor uncos even tried wearing gloves so they could catch .
Oh my
The AFL ball is leather not rubber, is travels at a much faster rate & usualu from a lot longer distance than 5 meters spazza!
League is simply rugby for retarrds!
We need help to catch the ball .
A basic skill that 8 yr olds can master .

Yep so we made the ball twice as big, made it from dimpled plastic and catch it on our chest on in our hands - oh wait that's RL!

AFLcrap1 · Post by **AFLcrap1** » Sat May 07, 2016 10:08 pm

leagueiscrap wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
leagueiscrap wrote:
Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-pre ... 6537371851

they only have to cach a 5 meter throw with a rubber ball
Lol a 3 yr old article . Nothing to do with the NRL just Some old bloke thinks players could wear gloves .

Keep grasping at straws

lol like usual when it suits you youll use an article not from this week, when it doesnt, you mock it off! like usual selective hyprcrite fuckstick

"Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors"

they only have to catch the ball from a 5 meter throw a rubber ball FFS then they fumble it several times, most the time they don't even have an opponent

Bhaaaaa
Can you show me anywhere where the NRL were asked or spoke about using gloves in that article .
I'll wait.

Talking Footy

Talking Footy

who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers

Who is online