


Good luck.
Lol swans are to big! So brag about your minnows the eels being bigger then gws the new start up team that have won wooden spoons!ParraEelsNRL wrote:Poor GWS, having to deal with not only Parra being resurgent in the west, but their get out clause looks to be fucked too with the Raiders coming out of their post Super League slumber (finally)![]()
![]()
![]()
Good luck.
But aren't their crowds up and their about to break their membership AND their in the 8??? I don't think it matters in the slightest only looks like wishful thinking on your behalf!ParraEelsNRL wrote:Poor GWS, having to deal with not only Parra being resurgent in the west, but their get out clause looks to be fucked too with the Raiders coming out of their post Super League slumber (finally)![]()
![]()
![]()
Good luck.
GWS in the top 8 and the first of their Sydney home games start this coming week with a blockbuster vs Hawthorn at Spotless Stadium. Ticket sales looking good thus far on Ticketmaster website.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Poor GWS, having to deal with not only Parra being resurgent in the west, but their get out clause looks to be fucked too with the Raiders coming out of their post Super League slumber (finally)![]()
![]()
![]()
Good luck.
No perhaps you should read Para's opening statement and your reply to Bea again - Para said GWS was failing because of Para and Raiders being strong and showing resurgence, Both Bea and I pointed out irrespective of any resurgence GWS was actually increasing in success and thus pointing out the failure of this thread. You chimed in on que suggesting that a direct comparison shows they are underperforming - geeze you can't even follow the conversation above - look perhaps you should read all the posts so you have some context rather than ones you want to contradict??AFLcrap1 wrote:What the fuck are you ranting about now .
Bea stated that he thought that GWS were averaging better than the Raiders in Canberra .
All I did was ask him to post the average of each in Canberra .
Yet you go on a rant about how old teams are etc .
LOL you're failure at comprehending plain English is astounding .
to be fair GWS has been onfield basket cases for pretty much their entire existence, while the wanderers, have been set up well & been rather successful.its actuary pretty funny reading thickshit no1 but buts about the Wanderers!post_hoc wrote:Going to be even worse for GWS when the Wanderers move into the stadium and make their averages look dismal, god I hope we get there crowd counter as well, we are going to average 43,000 at the stadium (yes i know it only holds 24,000)
oh yes Wanderers are even younger than GWS so you really cant use the 5 year old excuse with us. Oh but I guess the difference is we know what success looks like. You guys win a game at it's like you won a final
an A league supporter bragging about crowds. Funny stuffpost_hoc wrote:Going to be even worse for GWS when the Wanderers move into the stadium and make their averages look dismal, god I hope we get there crowd counter as well, we are going to average 43,000 at the stadium (yes i know it only holds 24,000)
oh yes Wanderers are even younger than GWS so you really cant use the 5 year old excuse with us. Oh but I guess the difference is we know what success looks like. You guys win a game at it's like you won a final
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 6 guests