King-Eliagh wrote:I mean it's clear the policy is not doing what it is supposed to do. While it sounds all nice and cosy like, it's really condoning drug use to a level that is unprecedented in any other organisation. I mean has anyone here ever worked in an org where you can get done for drugs three times and still have the opportunity if you tell them it was a mistake
I think you might need to work on you numbers comprehension skills KE. Its 3 strikes and you are out, not 3 strikes and you get to say it was a mistake and please give me one more.
I'm not sure how this is news. Yes we know the one player who was banned from the league. Yes we know others have strikes on their records and it stands to reason that they would take some time off work to try to get on top of their issues.
As to the policy. It was a ground breaking policy at the time that tests its employees more often then any other organisation in the country. I will agree that perhaps it has one strike to many, but even with one strike less it still wouldn't fix the issues of drugs. It would be interesting to see the number of players caught by the RL policy, however they don't publish their results.