BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
Claimant: Raiderdave
Challenger: NSWAFL
Challenged: 1500 22/2/12
Claimant: Raiderdave
Challenger: NSWAFL
Challenged: 1500 22/2/12
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
Absolutely no doubt that Dave is BSing. The AFL plays matches for premiership points in every state and territory in Australia. It plays games in Darwin, Launceston, Canberra and as of this year Hobart. It will also play a second game in Cairns this year. Add to this that the five mainland states all have AFL clubs and no less than two to a state.
That is national.
That is national.
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
I suggest this be decided on.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
doesnt it depend on raiders context of what national means? Seeming he made the statement we must first understand 'his' context first, just as we needed to find nsw context of 'across', which actually ended up being '1/25th of the way across'. So if Raider doesnt post in here then isnt this a dead rubber? Remember, although he doesnt understand its appropriate meaning, 'context' is the Xman's buzz word lately. 


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
You mean like everybnody took notice of my and a journalist's context of "black vs white".King-Eliagh wrote:doesnt it depend on raiders context of what national means?
Yeah, why not.
Nice try Cos.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
cos789 wrote:You mean like everybnody took notice of my and a journalist's context of "black vs white".King-Eliagh wrote:doesnt it depend on raiders context of what national means?
Yeah, why not.
shu'up FITH, you'll never be my BFF, OMG, you are so FITH


xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
You can't have it both ways KE
Seems pretty B&W to me. You lose .
Seems pretty B&W to me. You lose .
Nice try Cos.
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
It's been more than a week here, Xman.
- King-Eliagh
- Coach
- Posts: 12787
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
- Team: Parramatta
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
Dead rubber.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
Verdict: bs point to rdKing-Eliagh wrote:Dead rubber.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
Gees louise, Raider is now just 1 BS point away from being the first person to hit 10 BS points. Way to go Raider.
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 7:50 am
- Team: Newcastle Knights
- Location:
Re: BS file claim#24: AFL is not national
This whole thing is Bs