Page 4 of 5

Re: Question

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:11 pm
by NSWAFL
It was too long ago now for me to find it, Xman. It doesn't matter. We both know what a whiner Dunce is. Let him whine. It's water off a duck's back. He's basing the whole thing on multiple links and we both know that was BS.

Re: Question

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 9:17 am
by King-Eliagh
NSWAFL wrote:
It was too long ago now for me to find it, Xman.
Liar. There's only one thread to look for it, and there's no apology there. Another prime example of your inability to face up to the facts. And lets not forget that parra found more than that porn as a link which should not have been clicked on. Just look through BS file 2, its not hard to find, page 9 is where he starts going through your links.

Now its time to leave all that behind nsw, and apologise to me and the members. I'm waiting nsw :)

Re: Question

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:13 am
by cos789
Well, just look see at all the sooks sooking.

Re: Question

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 11:19 am
by King-Eliagh
Yes he just dont want to apologise. Terrob;e sooking, like that of a 4 year old [-X

Comon nsw, say you're sorry for putting the bad links up, its not hard and I wont tease you for saying sorry. I'll think better of you.

Re: Question

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:03 am
by ParraEelsNRL
NSWAFL wrote:
Debbie's suspended, Dunce. I got a PM advising of it.

And this people is exactly why xmoron should not be a mod.

Most sites state that mods are not to talk to other members outside of admin or moderators on banning people, it's UNPROFESSIONAL [-X

Re: Question

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 1:09 am
by ParraEelsNRL
A mod is supposed to be straight down the line and not show favouritism or bias in his/her dealings with forum members based on what sex they are, what sport, political views, religious beliefs and so on that they may have.

When you start listening to other forum members on who should be banned or who should get favourable treatment, you have over stepped the line and indeed are unfit for such decisions.

Re: Question

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:42 am
by NSWAFL
You were told to stop by a mod and you deliberately ignored the instruction and multiple times. That's why you got suspended and the call was right. Live with it, Debbie.

Re: Question

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:44 am
by King-Eliagh
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
Debbie's suspended, Dunce. I got a PM advising of it.

And this people is exactly why xmoron should not be a mod.

Most sites state that mods are not to talk to other members outside of admin or moderators on banning people, it's UNPROFESSIONAL [-X
Precisely.

Re: Question

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:44 am
by King-Eliagh
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
A mod is supposed to be straight down the line and not show favouritism or bias in his/her dealings with forum members based on what sex they are, what sport, political views, religious beliefs and so on that they may have.

When you start listening to other forum members on who should be banned or who should get favourable treatment, you have over stepped the line and indeed are unfit for such decisions.
Exactly.

Re: Question

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 10:45 am
by King-Eliagh
NSWAFL wrote:
You were told to stop by a mod and you deliberately ignored the instruction and multiple times. That's why got suspended and the call was right. Live with it, Debbie.
Dumbass ignoramus whining child.

Re: Question

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:37 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
Debbie's suspended, Dunce. I got a PM advising of it.

And this people is exactly why xmoron should not be a mod.

Most sites state that mods are not to talk to other members outside of admin or moderators on banning people, it's UNPROFESSIONAL [-X
The pm wasn't from me dopey :roll:

Re: Question

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:38 pm
by Xman
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
A mod is supposed to be straight down the line and not show favouritism or bias in his/her dealings with forum members based on what sex they are, what sport, political views, religious beliefs and so on that they may have.

When you start listening to other forum members on who should be banned or who should get favourable treatment, you have over stepped the line and indeed are unfit for such decisions.
I didn't suspend you. I didn't have the ability at the time.

Re: Question

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:40 pm
by NSWAFL
Xman wrote:
ParraEelsNRL wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
Debbie's suspended, Dunce. I got a PM advising of it.

And this people is exactly why xmoron should not be a mod.

Most sites state that mods are not to talk to other members outside of admin or moderators on banning people, it's UNPROFESSIONAL [-X
The pm wasn't from me dopey :roll:
That's right, it was from Beaussie.

Re: Question

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:24 pm
by King-Eliagh
Lets get this straight, the suspension was from beaussie on Xman's incessant urging.

Calling someone a peeping tom should be allowed on these boards. It's clearly a joke and there's been a lot worse which Xman lets go. Such as threatening someones house the way the littlest aflfan did. :wink:

Re: Question

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:38 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Lets get this straight, the suspension was from beaussie on Xman's incessant urging.

Calling someone a peeping tom should be allowed on these boards. It's clearly a joke and there's been a lot worse which Xman lets go. Such as threatening someones house the way the littlest aflfan did. :wink:
Wrong, no incessant urging.

No member, and I mean no afl or RL fan members, deserve to suffer continued personal and targeted attacks especially those containing criminal accusations.