Talking Footy

Ah cos, you put the comparison up in the first place. I simply followed suit with a more accurate version. It's all very silly anyway and I have some fantastic news to report to you about my return to ARF. You'll find it in the fightclub proper. This international room is dead as nowadays, not surprising as it was really just a trash can for your tragic spam. Seeya!

Oh and seeya too lillestaflfan.Cos' butt might still be here for awhile for you to sniff so stick around!

King-Eliagh wrote:

Ah cos, you put the comparison up in the first place.

And clearly won.
If someone cannot see the resemblance between a game developed from RU and another game developed from RU
then you're FITH, complete and utter FITH.

And someone doesn't like the fact that up to a 3rd of PNG plays RL making it have more participants in PNG playing RL than all vfl and vfl's little helper (vickick) combined world wide =D> :D

How you like them numbers cuzzy the king of the vickickers? :<>

Late night Lurker, you there?

FITH and getting worse

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And someone doesn't like the fact that up to a 3rd of PNG plays RL making it have more participants in PNG playing RL than all vfl and vfl's little helper (vickick) combined world wide =D> :D

That's another entry for the BS file!

NSWAFL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And someone doesn't like the fact that up to a 3rd of PNG plays RL making it have more participants in PNG playing RL than all vfl and vfl's little helper (vickick) combined world wide =D> :D

That's another entry for the BS file!

You may want to clear this up but looking at Parras post I think he means more RL participants in PNG than AFL overall, since he is calling afl VFL.

I know. That's what I'm calling BS. Remember that she included Auskick.

NSWAFL wrote:

I know. That's what I'm calling BS. Remember that she included Auskick.

Your challenge suggests you are claiming ARs in Victoria. I think he is saying ARs in Australia. Could you please clarify before the bs file is created. Cheers.

Okay. I'll adjust to Australia instead of Victoria, but he'll lose either way because even just Victoria would outstrip PNG!

NSWAFL wrote:

Okay. I'll adjust to Australia instead of Victoria, but he'll lose either way because even just Victoria would outstrip PNG!

Can I suggest you clarify with him. Remember it's his context that is considered.

You know he won't pay any attention to me!

NSWAFL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And someone doesn't like the fact that up to a 3rd of PNG plays RL making it have more participants in PNG playing RL than all vfl and vfl's little helper (vickick) combined world wide =D> :D

That's another entry for the BS file!

Call your code what you like, you know what I meant.

And while you're at it, I accept your BS file.

Xman wrote:

NSWAFL wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And someone doesn't like the fact that up to a 3rd of PNG plays RL making it have more participants in PNG playing RL than all vfl and vfl's little helper (vickick) combined world wide =D> :D

That's another entry for the BS file!

You may want to clear this up but looking at Parras post I think he means more RL participants in PNG than AFL overall, since he is calling afl VFL.

Ol' FITH hasn't got the guts(or intelligence)to mean what he says.
Such a pathetic sook.