Page 8 of 10

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 10:00 am
by NSWAFL
cos789 wrote:
NSWAFL wrote:
There you go! You should bookmark this and go back to it every time Dunce makes the claim.
He can't get past it.
Well he's going to have to eventually if he doesn't want to have a nervous breakdown over this elaborate lie he's maintaining and can't against the sheer weight of evidence.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 11:53 am
by King-Eliagh
"sheer weight of evidence" :lol:

Thats you and cos saying "no you didnt play". So heavy is your evidence :lol: You're right it's killing me...from laughter! :lol:

you comedians are blessed! :lol:

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 1:10 pm
by cos789
KE, why do you laugh at your predicament ?
You appear completely moronic ! :oops: :oops: :oops:

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:05 pm
by King-Eliagh
I know the truth. :lol:

My predicament is fine. Your predication is funny :wink:

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2012 2:39 pm
by NSWAFL
cos789 wrote:
KE, why do you laugh at your predicament ?
You appear completely moronic ! :oops: :oops: :oops:
Appear?

Dunce IS completely moronic, Cos!

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:32 pm
by cos789
Just being nice.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:00 pm
by NSWAFL
Waste of time with Dunce in my book!

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:06 pm
by King-Eliagh
Is that why you didnt apologise to all our members for posting smut and viruses on our boards nsw? Do you think they are all a waste of time to be nice to too?

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:53 pm
by cos789
I amazed more rl types don't like American Football - the (lack of) attention span is perfect.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:05 pm
by King-Eliagh
RL is very different to this game cos. In fact i'd argue that AR is = or more similar to American Football.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:37 pm
by cos789
King-Eliagh wrote:
RL is very different to this game cos. In fact i'd argue that AR is = or more similar to American Football.
Then you'd lose. :wink: :wink: :wink:

American Football developed from rugby with one forward pass allowed.
It is stop/start in nature like rl.
It has 4 attempts to make 10 yards vs 6 tackles.
It has a basic rugby style field, posts and scoring.
It has basic rugby setup, line of scrimage,forwards/backs, tackling and throwing.
It has 11 men Vs 13 men on the field.

American Football's only similarity with AF is the "completion" is similar to the "mark" and shepherding is allowed.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:59 pm
by NSWAFL
I see in quoting that Dunce showed his lack of understanding of AFL again. Well buried, Cos!

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:17 pm
by cos789
NSWAFL wrote:
I see in quoting that Dunce showed his lack of understanding of AFL again. Well buried, Cos!
Having said that, the big touchdown pass is the feature of American Football and that's why Americans like the high marks of the Australian game (doesn't everybody) but also they like the unrestricted free flowing nature of the game which is the opposite to theirs. Interestingly some of the laws in isolation are exactly like those of AF. A receiver going for the ball is not allowed to be interferred with. In the superbowl there was a large outcry because a player wasn't flagged for putting one hand on the shoulder of the opponent whilst executing a very AR style spoil with the other..

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:40 pm
by King-Eliagh
cos789 wrote:
King-Eliagh wrote:
RL is very different to this game cos. In fact i'd argue that AR is = or more similar to American Football.
Then you'd lose. :wink: :wink: :wink:

American Football developed from rugby with one forward pass allowed.
It is stop/start in nature like rl.
It has 4 attempts to make 10 yards vs 6 tackles.
It has a basic rugby style field, posts and scoring.
It has basic rugby setup, line of scrimage,forwards/backs, tackling and throwing.
It has 11 men Vs 13 men on the field.

American Football's only similarity with AF is the "completion" is similar to the "mark" and shepherding is allowed.
You can wipe point two, as AR is just as much stop start as RL and AF. i.e every mark. Both AR and RL is much more flowing than AF.
Point 3 is fairly pointless. Massive differences there, which you've basically highlighted.
Point 4 ok.
Point 5 = fairly lame as the amount of men on the field is really a minor element of the actual sport. Dont think you'd understand that though as you rarely think deeper than superficial shmack.

The completion and shepherding are similar yes. But more importantly, the structure of the game/making ground is much more similar to AR. You can go forward and back, players must lead and move to free themselves to take a mark. This structural similarity between AR and AF is something RL does not share at all. btw a side thought. How many afl compared to nrl players have made it to the nfl? :-k

I see your lil bitch is chiming in with his whole hearted support :lol:

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:43 pm
by cos789
That is so imbecilic and moronic.
WTF cares.