
http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/s ... 1q4pg.html
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
You obviously don't know Sheedy well at all!King-Eliagh wrote:Sheesh, I bet Sheedy's disappointed in these two upcoming stars.![]()
http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/s ... 1q4pg.html
King-Eliagh wrote:Sheesh, I bet Sheedy's disappointed in these two upcoming stars.![]()
http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/s ... 1q4pg.html
You truly are a redneck bogan aren't you RDRaiderdave wrote:King-Eliagh wrote:Sheesh, I bet Sheedy's disappointed in these two upcoming stars.![]()
http://www.smh.com.au/executive-style/s ... 1q4pg.html![]()
![]()
![]()
how .... Gai
![]()
![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Prove itNSWAFL wrote:And they'll be back, imbecile!
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
King-Eliagh wrote:Prove itNSWAFL wrote:And they'll be back, imbecile!![]()
Xman, get this man onto the BS files. I've proven my case quite sufficiently and he's just whippin out the old statements as facts without any evidence whatsoever.
oh so you've now changed your original tune to tune to... you predict they'll be back onlyNSWAFL wrote:I don't have to prove anything. The article doesn't say they won't be back. You assume they won't be back. I'm calling you on that assumption and I predict they will be back because of the BS pay packets if anything.