Xman wrote:A classic response from someone on the back foot mark.
I don't know how you got I was on the back foot from that. You AFL types sure think in mysterious ways






























Xman wrote:A classic response from someone on the back foot mark.
NRLCrap1 wrote:I never stated I'm right.
NRLCrap1 wrote:call me a skirt lifting sheila.
A classic response from someone who's very confused....MarkZZZ wrote:Xman wrote:A classic response from someone on the back foot mark.
I don't know how you got I was on the back foot from that. You AFL types sure think in mysterious ways
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Xman wrote:A classic response from someone who's very confused....MarkZZZ wrote:Xman wrote:A classic response from someone on the back foot mark.
I don't know how you got I was on the back foot from that. You AFL types sure think in mysterious ways
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NRLCrap1 wrote:I never stated I'm right.
NRLCrap1 wrote:call me a skirt lifting sheila.
since when is "but but but..." facts?MarkZZZ wrote:Xman wrote:A classic response from someone who's very confused....MarkZZZ wrote:
I don't know how you got I was on the back foot from that. You AFL types sure think in mysterious ways
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Lets see I am accused for being on the back foot, why? Because I am stating facts. Now I am confused because????????? Now that is something I am confused about. What am I confused about Xman?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
oh dear oh dear oh deary me.Xman wrote:since when is "but but but..." facts?MarkZZZ wrote:Xman wrote:A classic response from someone who's very confused....
Lets see I am accused for being on the back foot, why? Because I am stating facts. Now I am confused because????????? Now that is something I am confused about. What am I confused about Xman?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
NRLCrap1 wrote:I never stated I'm right.
NRLCrap1 wrote:call me a skirt lifting sheila.
what a laughable little contest youve got going there.MarkZZZ wrote:oh dear oh dear oh deary me.Xman wrote:since when is "but but but..." facts?MarkZZZ wrote:
Lets see I am accused for being on the back foot, why? Because I am stating facts. Now I am confused because????????? Now that is something I am confused about. What am I confused about Xman?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The but but buts where part of different thread.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3263&start=60
Who is the one confused here.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The fact in this thread are that the NRL did in actual fact have the biggest prelim crown this year out of the NRL and the AFL. =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
If QLFAFL and you are stating that it was higher due to being inflated because it included wives etc it is total BS and if you want we can take it to the BS files and have Striker adjudicate on it. Lets see if any one of the two of you can produce some hard evidence that that was the case. :P :P :P :P :P :P
That is the FACT part of my statement - The NRL outdrew the AFL with the highest attendance of the prelim games this year. :D :D :D :D :D :D
Xman wrote:Mark you dunce. The NRL have even admitted counting staff, players etc in their crowd figure, not the AFL. That's what qldafl was referring too.MarkZZZ wrote:One thing I have noticed so far with the AFLQLD kid is that he isn't very good with numbers. AFL = more players = more player wives GFs parents etc and need more assistant staff, MCG needs more people that work there, it is after all 25% bigger in capacity, take all them away and what have you got, the AFL crowd is even smaller.QueenslandISAFL wrote:take away the players, player wives, people who work there and the AFL crowd is bigger![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Pies is right too. The NRL crowd was a huge jump on last year so according to the NRL fans on this site that must be fabricated.
Finally, the AFLs 127k for the round would have generated around $12m. The NRLs cheaper tickets and lower total of 95k would have generated only $4.9m![]()
but but but, anyone can make up excuses XMAN, you just seem to excel at it in this website.Xman wrote:what a laughable little contest youve got going there.MarkZZZ wrote:oh dear oh dear oh deary me.Xman wrote:since when is "but but but..." facts?
The but but buts where part of different thread.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3263&start=60
Who is the one confused here.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The fact in this thread are that the NRL did in actual fact have the biggest prelim crown this year out of the NRL and the AFL. =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
If QLFAFL and you are stating that it was higher due to being inflated because it included wives etc it is total BS and if you want we can take it to the BS files and have Striker adjudicate on it. Lets see if any one of the two of you can produce some hard evidence that that was the case. :P :P :P :P :P :P
That is the FACT part of my statement - The NRL outdrew the AFL with the highest attendance of the prelim games this year. :D :D :D :D :D :DIt totally depends on the matchups. If the Eagles and Crows had home prelim finals the NRL would win if they had 2 sydney teams playing. If the AFL had a melbourne v melbourne final the AFL would win comfortably. Well done to the NRL for finally getting a crowd above 50k. Weve had over 20 this year
![]()
http://www.news.com.au/sport/AFL/most-e ... 6473721338Dogs wrote:Xman wrote:Mark you dunce. The NRL have even admitted counting staff, players etc in their crowd figure, not the AFL. That's what qldafl was referring too.MarkZZZ wrote:One thing I have noticed so far with the AFLQLD kid is that he isn't very good with numbers. AFL = more players = more player wives GFs parents etc and need more assistant staff, MCG needs more people that work there, it is after all 25% bigger in capacity, take all them away and what have you got, the AFL crowd is even smaller.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Pies is right too. The NRL crowd was a huge jump on last year so according to the NRL fans on this site that must be fabricated.
Finally, the AFLs 127k for the round would have generated around $12m. The NRLs cheaper tickets and lower total of 95k would have generated only $4.9m![]()
Whats fabricated is your nonsense. I found a couple of webstes to do a comparison, which could be done reasonably fairly across the first couple of weeks. Ticket prices don't appear even close to the gap your trying on above. Overall, they would be similiar across the park judging by these two websites, with NRL slightly more affordable. So not sure how you work out NRL made nearly 1/3 of AFL. BS files for you, again I am sure.
http://media.ticketmaster.com/en-au/img ... Prices.pdf
http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... D=20477420
Wake up dogs!IT'S at the same stadium, but a ticket to the next week's Swans AFL preliminary final will cost twice the equivalent seat at the NRL grand final qualifier the following night.
Yep, and you thought your latest power bill was bad.
When the Swans host the winner of tomorrow night's semi-final between Collingwood and West Coast the most expensive AFL ticket ($160 platinum) is exactly double the same category NRL ticket ($80 category one).
The cheapest entry level ticket for an adult is also double the price - $70 compared to $35 when the Bulldogs face the winner of tomorrow's Rabbitohs-Raiders semi.
The NRL has 1 decent crowd for their finals so far. Why? Because they had a final involving 2 local teams that are also 2 of their best supported. Their fans are all high fiving like its a sign of things to come. Amazing how quickly they've forgotten about some of their other shocking finals crowds like manly.Dogs wrote:but but but, anyone can make up excuses XMAN, you just seem to excel at it in this website.Xman wrote:what a laughable little contest youve got going there.MarkZZZ wrote:oh dear oh dear oh deary me.
The but but buts where part of different thread.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3263&start=60
Who is the one confused here.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The fact in this thread are that the NRL did in actual fact have the biggest prelim crown this year out of the NRL and the AFL. =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
If QLFAFL and you are stating that it was higher due to being inflated because it included wives etc it is total BS and if you want we can take it to the BS files and have Striker adjudicate on it. Lets see if any one of the two of you can produce some hard evidence that that was the case. :P :P :P :P :P :P
That is the FACT part of my statement - The NRL outdrew the AFL with the highest attendance of the prelim games this year. :D :D :D :D :D :DIt totally depends on the matchups. If the Eagles and Crows had home prelim finals the NRL would win if they had 2 sydney teams playing. If the AFL had a melbourne v melbourne final the AFL would win comfortably. Well done to the NRL for finally getting a crowd above 50k. Weve had over 20 this year
![]()
Did you forgot you posted up 2.5times more did you. And dropped in a point 9 to make it look more like 3 times.Xman wrote:http://www.news.com.au/sport/AFL/most-e ... 6473721338Dogs wrote:Xman wrote:Mark you dunce. The NRL have even admitted counting staff, players etc in their crowd figure, not the AFL. That's what qldafl was referring too.
Pies is right too. The NRL crowd was a huge jump on last year so according to the NRL fans on this site that must be fabricated.
Finally, the AFLs 127k for the round would have generated around $12m. The NRLs cheaper tickets and lower total of 95k would have generated only $4.9m![]()
Whats fabricated is your nonsense. I found a couple of webstes to do a comparison, which could be done reasonably fairly across the first couple of weeks. Ticket prices don't appear even close to the gap your trying on above. Overall, they would be similiar across the park judging by these two websites, with NRL slightly more affordable. So not sure how you work out NRL made nearly 1/3 of AFL. BS files for you, again I am sure.
http://media.ticketmaster.com/en-au/img ... Prices.pdf
http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... D=20477420
Wake up dogs!IT'S at the same stadium, but a ticket to the next week's Swans AFL preliminary final will cost twice the equivalent seat at the NRL grand final qualifier the following night.
Yep, and you thought your latest power bill was bad.
When the Swans host the winner of tomorrow night's semi-final between Collingwood and West Coast the most expensive AFL ticket ($160 platinum) is exactly double the same category NRL ticket ($80 category one).
The cheapest entry level ticket for an adult is also double the price - $70 compared to $35 when the Bulldogs face the winner of tomorrow's Rabbitohs-Raiders semi.![]()
seriously, what the f are you on about?Dogs wrote:Did you forgot you posted up 2.5times more did you. And dropped in a point 9 to make it look more like 3 times.Xman wrote:http://www.news.com.au/sport/AFL/most-e ... 6473721338Dogs wrote:
Whats fabricated is your nonsense. I found a couple of webstes to do a comparison, which could be done reasonably fairly across the first couple of weeks. Ticket prices don't appear even close to the gap your trying on above. Overall, they would be similiar across the park judging by these two websites, with NRL slightly more affordable. So not sure how you work out NRL made nearly 1/3 of AFL. BS files for you, again I am sure.
http://media.ticketmaster.com/en-au/img ... Prices.pdf
http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page ... D=20477420
Wake up dogs!IT'S at the same stadium, but a ticket to the next week's Swans AFL preliminary final will cost twice the equivalent seat at the NRL grand final qualifier the following night.
Yep, and you thought your latest power bill was bad.
When the Swans host the winner of tomorrow night's semi-final between Collingwood and West Coast the most expensive AFL ticket ($160 platinum) is exactly double the same category NRL ticket ($80 category one).
The cheapest entry level ticket for an adult is also double the price - $70 compared to $35 when the Bulldogs face the winner of tomorrow's Rabbitohs-Raiders semi.![]()
Notice I mentioned that across the board, they are simliar with NRl slightly lower. Not just pick out what I think others want to see, unlike yourself. And beyond that I supported my post with URL's, something you commonly ask for, but struggle with yourself.
Well I was talking about the prelim round only.Dogs wrote:Granted on the prelim week, I was looking the first couple of weeks
Gees, when it comes to predictions you struggle big time eh? Way off darlin, way off with your silly predictions.Raiderdave wrote:of either code![]()
wow
what an achievement
when has this ever happened before ?![]()
the Bulldogs & South Sydney will do this ... & not just .. but easily![]()
![]()
![]()
Souths first prelim final since 1968 .. so their fans will litterally come out of the woodwork from everywhere ... up against the Bulldogs with one of the largest supporter bases in the game....
80,000 plus for sure
Sydney will be abuzz ... its back to the glory days
Sydney will celebrate a piece of its past this week & nothing else will take the gloss off or attention from this all Sydney prelim final .... nothing
it will attract 800K veiwers in Sydney alone on TV
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 10 guests