Talking Footy

The stupidity is astonishing .

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Foolproof wrote:

Show me how they promoted it any other way.

Piss off idiot .
You made a claim ,with no proof posted at all
Now you want me to prove something that doesn't exist ,actually exists .
You sir are a ****** .

Either put up or shut up .
Show me where DG ha stated that the next AL TV rights will be negotiated using playing numbers .

I'll wait.

It isn't my fault if you can't read. Do you understand the concept of "The failure to act" AKA Omission? I would guess you don't.

You have moved from The AL to the WC. Bid .
The WC bid has nothing,zero ,nil to do with the AL upcoming TV rights .
That's called deflection

you made some bullshit argument that the playing numbers were going to be used as a bargaining tool in the discussions .

So far you have not shown one iota of evidence ,& went off on a WC tangent .
Now show some proof ,about the AL ,not anything else ,or fuck off .

Hehe, Cricket, Australia's number 1 Summer sport and arguably Australia's biggest sport.

Been a good summer so far, haven't heard much about the aye league tbh outside an ad on local tv here telling me Sydney is playing Newcastle some time soon.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

You have moved from The AL to the WC. Bid .
The WC bid has nothing,zero ,nil to do with the AL upcoming TV rights .
That's called deflection

you made some bullshit argument that the playing numbers were going to be used as a bargaining tool in the discussions .

So far you have not shown one iota of evidence ,& went off on a WC tangent .
Now show some proof ,about the AL ,not anything else ,or fuck off .

Go get fucked until you get a decent education and understand the law of omission.

Spot on Wookie .
He started a strawman argument ,with some nonsense about tv rights being sold on playing numbers .

I asked for some proof .
All I got was rants about WC ..

I have never heard of any sport trying to get a tv deal by using playing numbers
It's absurd .
Tv execs care about one thing .
Eyeballs on the screen .

The_Wookie wrote:

What the fuck are you on about.

Thread goes on a tangent from this point.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Lol can't see tv execs paying double when the ratings are woeful .
But I'm sure DG will tell them .
Ummmm aghhhhhhhhh. We are more popular than Cricket.

Foolproof wrote:

When it comes to playing numbers in the suburbs and the country, soccer is at least as popular. That's what they sell it on.

And they're wrong.

YOU bought up player numbers - utterly irrelevant to Aleague TV rights or fucking netball would be on a massive tv deal.

Then you also mention the World Cup bid, which has literally nothing to do with Aleague tv rights as they are entirely the province of FIFA.

Do you ever tire of being a moron?

It is my opinion and I stand by it. I believe the reason the TV rights for A League are an issue is exactly the same reason we failed to gain the 2022 World Cup. I have shown why I believe this through the law of omission.

Does expressing an opinion with a base of research make me a moron?

So let me get this straight .
Last AL TV rights they only got 40 mill per season because some drongo forget to tell the execs that sokka is the most participated sport in the country.

Won't happen this time DG will tell them & they will put up big $$$$$.


Lol you sir are a moron .

That means the NRL rights will more than double next time because the code gained near 1 million more participants this year, happy days for Rugby League eh?

Using foolsproved criteria, the NRL could be looking at a tv deal worth anywhere up to 2.5 billion all because of participation.

The_Wookie wrote:

It does if the basis for the research is fucking wrong you twat. and you dont even have a base of research to begin with. And we didnt fail to get the World Cup because of something like participation numbers. Christ all fucking mighty.

NO TV rights are sold on participation numbers only. None. Like I said, if they were, then fucking Netball would have been dominating for fucking years.

Netball's problem is the gender issue so that's not relevant.

I have chosen not to believe you on other issues. You have chosen not to believe me on this and rejected the law of omission. So now we're even.

Lol
Fooly ,I will ask you once again ,
Show some proof ,a source ,a quote from Gallop .anything to back up your absurd claim .
If you can't then there is nothing to do but say you are full of shit .

Fooly ,you are full of shit .

Bump***

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Ol Raider & his truth bombs



BAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!

how do you get a loud mouthed deluded wanking sooker fan to shut the fuck up

mention the BBL

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

How do you make a lying pissweak NRL fan to shit up? Mention that NRL players seem to like bashing their wives and girlfriends.

post_hoc wrote:

How do you make a lying pissweak NRL fan to shit up? Mention that NRL players seem to like bashing their wives and girlfriends.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
shit up ?



shit up >
:_<> :_<> :_<>

hes seething with rage folks
can't even post correctly hes so enraged

a cwanky widdle porky worky chopsy whopsy
settle down pal
the truth will set u free
embrace it son
embrace it

Wow a typo, Raiderdave still delusional