
Ya think if it was horse racing these two mares would be in the same division?

The bbl folks, it's out there and very very real...
:>::
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Dogs were 2 points in front at three quarter time. GC then hit the front in the last quarter, then the dogs got back in front. I was half listening to it on the radio. Dogs kicked away but it was in the last 10 minutes or so. If you want to get technical it might have been a 10-15 but my point stands. It wasn't a flogging. In a 120 minute game it was close for 85% of the game. To claim otherwise would be inaccurate. Thats like an RL game being deadlocked until the 68th minute. (Exactly 85%) and then a couple of tries being scored.King-Eliagh wrote:Cough bullshit pies.
Was one goal between then at halftime with gc up by 6 then the dogs gave em an absolute pummelling. after halftime dogs scored 59 gc scored a measly 22 points
With10 mobs to go dogs were up by about 24
Pies pies pies, you of all people ought ya be ashamed of your blatant innacuracy...your bumblingly poor post, your massive self bitchslaps![]()
in the post above
![]()
piesman2011 wrote:Dogs were 2 points in front at three quarter time. GC then hit the front in the last quarter, then the dogs got back in front. I was half listening to it on the radio. Dogs kicked away but it was in the last 10 minutes or so. If you want to get technical it might have been a 10-15 but my point stands. It wasn't a flogging. In a 120 minute game it was close for 85% of the game. To claim otherwise would be inaccurate. Thats like an RL game being deadlocked until the 68th minute. (Exactly 85%) and then a couple of tries being scored.King-Eliagh wrote:Cough bullshit pies.
Was one goal between then at halftime with gc up by 6 then the dogs gave em an absolute pummelling. after halftime dogs scored 59 gc scored a measly 22 points
With10 mobs to go dogs were up by about 24
Pies pies pies, you of all people ought ya be ashamed of your blatant innacuracy...your bumblingly poor post, your massive self bitchslaps![]()
in the post above
![]()
seriously EKing-Eliagh wrote:It's a two horse race tmw folks Fremantle v gws. And the odds are coming in at gws 17-1. And freo 1.01 - 1
Ya think if it was horse racing these two mares would be in the same division?
The bbl folks, it's out there and very very real...
:>::
The suns lost 4 good players to injury last week. The Dogs are no push overs, they have beaten the Pies, Richmond and the Suns this year. They are playing some good footy and have some future stars in their team. The dogs just need a bit more consistency. I'm not sure why Im even having the argument, it's not like any of you watch the game.Raiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Dogs were 2 points in front at three quarter time. GC then hit the front in the last quarter, then the dogs got back in front. I was half listening to it on the radio. Dogs kicked away but it was in the last 10 minutes or so. If you want to get technical it might have been a 10-15 but my point stands. It wasn't a flogging. In a 120 minute game it was close for 85% of the game. To claim otherwise would be inaccurate. Thats like an RL game being deadlocked until the 68th minute. (Exactly 85%) and then a couple of tries being scored.King-Eliagh wrote:Cough bullshit pies.
Was one goal between then at halftime with gc up by 6 then the dogs gave em an absolute pummelling. after halftime dogs scored 59 gc scored a measly 22 points
With10 mobs to go dogs were up by about 24
Pies pies pies, you of all people ought ya be ashamed of your blatant innacuracy...your bumblingly poor post, your massive self bitchslaps![]()
in the post above
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
you're essentially arguing that the ..... next big thing ... the salary cap & draft cheating Thuns
were battling hard & making a go of it
against a bottom 6 basket case league side>
they should have won by 60 the way you singlet wearing twats are carrying on about them :_<> :_<>![]()
![]()
![]()
but
no Gerry Abscess Jnr
its
no Thuns folks
well beaten they were
well beaten
no finals for these filthy cheats this year
piesman2011 wrote:The suns lost 4 good players to injury last week. The Dogs are no push overs, they have beaten the Pies, Richmond and the Suns this year. They are playing some good footy and have some future stars in their team. The dogs just need a bit more consistency. I'm not sure why Im even having the argument, it's not like any of you watch the game.Raiderdave wrote:piesman2011 wrote:Dogs were 2 points in front at three quarter time. GC then hit the front in the last quarter, then the dogs got back in front. I was half listening to it on the radio. Dogs kicked away but it was in the last 10 minutes or so. If you want to get technical it might have been a 10-15 but my point stands. It wasn't a flogging. In a 120 minute game it was close for 85% of the game. To claim otherwise would be inaccurate. Thats like an RL game being deadlocked until the 68th minute. (Exactly 85%) and then a couple of tries being scored.King-Eliagh wrote:Cough bullshit pies.
Was one goal between then at halftime with gc up by 6 then the dogs gave em an absolute pummelling. after halftime dogs scored 59 gc scored a measly 22 points
With10 mobs to go dogs were up by about 24
Pies pies pies, you of all people ought ya be ashamed of your blatant innacuracy...your bumblingly poor post, your massive self bitchslaps![]()
in the post above
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
you're essentially arguing that the ..... next big thing ... the salary cap & draft cheating Thuns
were battling hard & making a go of it
against a bottom 6 basket case league side>
they should have won by 60 the way you singlet wearing twats are carrying on about them :_<> :_<>![]()
![]()
![]()
but
no Gerry Abscess Jnr
its
no Thuns folks
well beaten they were
well beaten
no finals for these filthy cheats this year
"Half listening to it"???piesman2011 wrote:Dogs were 2 points in front at three quarter time. GC then hit the front in the last quarter, then the dogs got back in front. I was half listening to it on the radio. Dogs kicked away but it was in the last 10 minutes or so. If you want to get technical it might have been a 10-15 but my point stands. It wasn't a flogging. In a 120 minute game it was close for 85% of the game. To claim otherwise would be inaccurate. Thats like an RL game being deadlocked until the 68th minute. (Exactly 85%) and then a couple of tries being scored.King-Eliagh wrote:Cough bullshit pies.
Was one goal between then at halftime with gc up by 6 then the dogs gave em an absolute pummelling. after halftime dogs scored 59 gc scored a measly 22 points
With10 mobs to go dogs were up by about 24
Pies pies pies, you of all people ought ya be ashamed of your blatant innacuracy...your bumblingly poor post, your massive self bitchslaps![]()
in the post above
![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
Hmmm yes, yes a good question there dogs and something worth discussing. My opinion as CEO of the bbl would be no, the AFL is a worse competition than that. The suns wouldnt make the 8 with or without their son of a drug Barron. They are quite simply that bad. You see, what I'm trying to say is somewhat contrary to, yet supportive of ur point here dogs. So, I'd prefer to turn the equation on its head and say that the competition is so poor that a team can have several good players and an out and out superstar and still not have a hope of making the 8 because the rest of their team are absolute blithering basketcases who wouldn't get a run in the first div state comps. It's truly that fukked up dogs.Dogs wrote:KE, GC certainly back in the race for BBL.
Is the AFL competition so poor, that it only takes one good player to make the top 8?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
That was a load of dribble KE, it was funny dribble but still what you basically said was ............King-Eliagh wrote:"Half listening to it"???piesman2011 wrote:Dogs were 2 points in front at three quarter time. GC then hit the front in the last quarter, then the dogs got back in front. I was half listening to it on the radio. Dogs kicked away but it was in the last 10 minutes or so. If you want to get technical it might have been a 10-15 but my point stands. It wasn't a flogging. In a 120 minute game it was close for 85% of the game. To claim otherwise would be inaccurate. Thats like an RL game being deadlocked until the 68th minute. (Exactly 85%) and then a couple of tries being scored.King-Eliagh wrote:Cough bullshit pies.
Was one goal between then at halftime with gc up by 6 then the dogs gave em an absolute pummelling. after halftime dogs scored 59 gc scored a measly 22 points
With10 mobs to go dogs were up by about 24
Pies pies pies, you of all people ought ya be ashamed of your blatant innacuracy...your bumblingly poor post, your massive self bitchslaps![]()
in the post above
![]()
Jesus pies, do I need to take back all the credit I've given you? I mean tell me pies, what ever happens to the pupil who only half listens at school?
I watched listened to and analysed the last 3/4s of the match and I'd like to set the story straight here. Pies is smearing bullshit across these pages like Julian oniell would do to a teammates shoe
In the second half there was a period wher the gc scored 1 goal in 30mins of footy. They were trounced and the worm and the stats prove me right and pies "I was half listening to it" man oh so very wrong![]()
Check this link for the truth folkshttp://m.AFL.com.au/match-centre/2014/17/wb-v-gcfc
Now pies I want you to read my signature very hard. I want you to have a think and a good hard look at yourself in the mirror and ask "do I wanna sound like a man who identifies himself online as a childhood / b grade movie fantasy action figure?
Cos that's what ur starting to sound like pies, now snap the fukk out of it!!!
King-Eliagh wrote:Hmmm yes, yes a good question there dogs and something worth discussing. My opinion as CEO of the bbl would be no, the AFL is a worse competition than that. The suns wouldnt make the 8 with or without their son of a drug Barron. They are quite simply that bad. You see, what I'm trying to say is somewhat contrary to, yet supportive of ur point here dogs. So, I'd prefer to turn the equation on its head and say that the competition is so poor that a team can have several good players and an out and out superstar and still not have a hope of making the 8 because the rest of their team are absolute blithering basketcases who wouldn't get a run in the first div state comps. It's truly that fukked up dogs.Dogs wrote:KE, GC certainly back in the race for BBL.
Is the AFL competition so poor, that it only takes one good player to make the top 8?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
The quoted post is from 2 weeks agoAFLcrap1 wrote:& the Thuns minus "The Hills Have Eyes" are back to their blithering basketcase best.
beaten by a basketcase team..well not beaten ,FLOGGED