Page 5 of 10

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:49 am
by NSWAFL
King-Eliagh wrote:
You dont have any facts to go by on that quote. You cant even prove those caucasion lads in the photo arent expats like you said you would cos.

NSW? Zippit princess :thumbleft:
You "zippit", Dunce! You don't know what you're talking about, and this is also proof that you hate AFL. You are attacking it with lies and statements that you can't possibly prove.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:54 am
by King-Eliagh
I want international AR to be discussed and highlighted the way it is in reality. I cant stand promo clowns who try to bend the truth and make things look different to what they are. This has got nothing to do with the game itself but you dropkicks who cant acknowledge the truth.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:56 am
by NSWAFL
No, you are the one who can't admit to the real truth.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:59 am
by King-Eliagh
I've admitted and acknowledged heaps. i.e. the 100,000 participants, the nations in which it is played etc. My issues is that you bimbos suggest it is friggin huge worldwide. Fact is, it is not. You cant even acknowledge that the vast majority of players o/s are expats. I have no hard proof of this but I'm telling you from my experience they are. I also played gaelic footy outside of ireland. Same thing, bunch of expats with a few interested locals.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:02 am
by NSWAFL
Then how do you explain the numbers at both the International Cup and the European Cup where ex-pats are forbidden to play?

You can't. Case closed.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:06 am
by King-Eliagh
I'll even acknowledge that. Doesnt change the fact that the vast majority playing o/s are expats :) Comrehende sunshine?

Also, I'd like to suggest that the standard o/s is quite low, severely decreasing any potential for pro comps to start. I only had a few seasons experience and rolled up into the amsterdam squad and contributed significantly to the wiping we handed to paris. The paris mens squad of 2009 would be knocked over by an aussie under 11's squad :lol:

Can you acknowledge the standard is low o/s nsw? You'll need to take those rose coloured tints off first :wink:

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:13 am
by NSWAFL
King-Eliagh wrote:
Can you acknowledge the standard is low o/s nsw? You'll need to take those rose coloured tints off first :wink:
Compared to the elite competition? Of course it is! But then there are leagues like that within Australia for God's sakes! The PNG Mosquitoes would be competitive against many grass roots AFL clubs for instance. Senior clubs that is. Good footy can still be played, but you wouldn't know that.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:23 am
by King-Eliagh
The PNG mosquitos may have a half decent senior side. But I'm talking about the broad international scene here. It's of a very low standard imo. And I'm pretty sure I'm right. :D

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 12:09 pm
by NSWAFL
All countries who played in the International Cup had a decent side that could play the game.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:04 pm
by King-Eliagh
And what do you consider "decent" nsw? :lol: Let's be realistic here. When you're representing a nation, you'd probably prefer to be above decent, you'd wanna be elite. Would you call them elite players nsw? :lol:

I just want you to know that professionalism o/s for AR looks a long way off. Why cant you just agree with me? It's crystal clear I'm right :)

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:57 pm
by NSWAFL
No it's crystal clear that you're wrong and that's not a stretch given how little you constantly show that you know about the great game of AFL!

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:00 pm
by King-Eliagh
I'm right. Its a low standard across the world. High standard in australia - fairly miserable elsewhere. Just be honest nsw, we're sick of your deception.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:01 pm
by NSWAFL
Translation of above; I know nothing about AFL and I'm trying to cover up my lack of knowledge by feedin everyone wishful cow dung.

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:04 pm
by King-Eliagh
:lol: you just agreed that the australian national team would wallop an international barbarian team by 527 to 16 :lol:

So you can forget your last post, its obviously a lie :)

Re: does PNG have more AR participants than rl participants

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:07 pm
by NSWAFL
No it's not as I have just explained on the other thread.