Talking Footy

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

How would I know?

Then don't rely on them!

How big is the percentage for any game of any sport played anywhere for the fans of that team?

Silly bloody question

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

How would I know?

Then don't rely on them!

How big is the percentage for any game of any sport played anywhere for the fans of that team?

Silly bloody question

Dumbest question ever on here.
But what do you expect off a
Stupid army jerk(pretender).

Hey Rambo if St Kiddyfiddla play Geebung then tell me how you know how many viewers are from St Kiddly Fiddla.

Jesus you just took rampant stupidity to new heights.
I

AFLcrap1 wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

How would I know?

Then don't rely on them!

How big is the percentage for any game of any sport played anywhere for the fans of that team?

Silly bloody question

Dumbest question ever on here.
But what do you expect off a
Stupid army jerk(pretender).

Hey Rambo if St Kiddyfiddla play Geebung then tell me how you know how many viewers are from St Kiddly Fiddla.

Jesus you just took rampant stupidity to new heights.
I

Yep that just about sums it all up I think.

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

How would I know?

Then don't rely on them!

How big is the percentage for any game of any sport played anywhere for the fans of that team?

Silly bloody question

Parra I have said time and time again tv ratings are just one indicator (and perhaps a very accurate one!) there are other indicators as well
Average crowds - people actually willing to come to your match
Memberships - people actually willing to put hands in pockets
Merchandising - people actually willing to wear your gear and pay for it
Sponsorship - business willing to part with coin to be associated with your club
Total football related revenue - how well all the above affects your club

The above are even more important indicators - why because anyone can switch on a TV for free (that's was pay is most prob more relevant indicator and I would concede that favours RL) now parramatta from what I have seen sits well in these categories - only the Snot Greens fail and fail Badly in every one of these respects - but the Swans tick all these boxes and OVERALL this is what makes them number one in NSW.

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And RL has under half the games of the AFL on FTA with only 1 live a week, I think you idiots should just shut up, you are looking pathetic seeing as RL out here wins yet ch9 is still living in the 19th century in regards to sports broadcasting.

yes parra

if the NRL had another 14 FTA games a season that the VFL has .. they have 92 ... we have 78
& an extra 7 games in total to match the VFL's number of 199.. 4 of them would be FTA too

then I think the NRL gets them by a million or 2

add our rep games
& its embarrassing for the fumblers
just .. plain .... embarrassing with us winning by nearly 20 million veiwers
now to pop a cherry on that cream cake
put all our games on pay just like them

its 25 Million !!

the difference is dribble dick, channel 9 pick their games and show them in prime time for the best ratings possible. & usuanly only have 1 game being played at a time
the AFL controls its schedule, many games games over lap each other being played at similar times as each other many being played and shown in after noons. unlike the NRL

so what ever excuse you want to make up, the NRL looses, even when all its rep & SOO games added in to it,
for the few thousand rating boxes across the country, that you basement dwellers live by.

the AFL has many other factors to back up the strong ratings
crowds, membership, sponsorship, football revenue.

what else does the NRL have poke revenue?

Touché Adam!

Swans4ever wrote:

Touché Adam!

Deflection again.

Back to your stupid post Demanding that Parra show how many of the tv viewers were Parra fans.

Tell me Sarge ,how dow does anyone know that.
It was a dumb question (even by your standards) & now shown up as close to a braindead **** as possible you are avoiding it.

I salute you on your deflecting ability.

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Touché Adam!

Deflection again.

Back to your stupid post Demanding that Parra show how many of the tv viewers were Parra fans.

Tell me Sarge ,how dow does anyone know that.
It was a dumb question (even by your standards) & now shown up as close to a braindead **** as possible you are avoiding it.

I salute you on your deflecting ability.

You sir are a moron - see post above where I said how can you determine club support from TV ratings when you don't know what percentages of fans are watching - are you dyslex???? Obviously you read the first word and assume the rest from there - but what do you expect when you are highly medicated like you are - please crapper seek help you have lost it!

Swans4ever wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Touché Adam!

Deflection again.

Back to your stupid post Demanding that Parra show how many of the tv viewers were Parra fans.

Tell me Sarge ,how dow does anyone know that.
It was a dumb question (even by your standards) & now shown up as close to a braindead **** as possible you are avoiding it.

I salute you on your deflecting ability.

You sir are a moron - see post above where I said how can you determine club support from TV ratings when you don't know what percentages of fans are watching - are you dyslex???? Obviously you read the first word and assume the rest from there - but what do you expect when you are highly medicated like you are - please crapper seek help you have lost it!

Here is your post .

Re: What is the more popular sport in Melbourne, Victoria?

Postby Swans4ever » Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:23 pm




ParraEelsNRL wrote:
What question is that?

What percentage of the TV audience are parra supporters!

Thanks Sarge..

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Touché Adam!

Deflection again.

Back to your stupid post Demanding that Parra show how many of the tv viewers were Parra fans.

Tell me Sarge ,how dow does anyone know that.
It was a dumb question (even by your standards) & now shown up as close to a braindead **** as possible you are avoiding it.

I salute you on your deflecting ability.

acturaly read before hand what was written
then post the full thing if you want answers.
not just copy and paste to suite

Australia vs Netherlands was watched by 5.6 million Americans alone


and many millions more around the world, probably 5 times the American figure, would of watched us play too, in all our group games.

So a state of Origin rating of 4 million is insignificant in comparison, miniscule really.

leagueiscrap wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

Swans4ever wrote:

Touché Adam!

Deflection again.

Back to your stupid post Demanding that Parra show how many of the tv viewers were Parra fans.

Tell me Sarge ,how dow does anyone know that.
It was a dumb question (even by your standards) & now shown up as close to a braindead **** as possible you are avoiding it.

I salute you on your deflecting ability.

acturaly read before hand what was written dazza the spazza
then post the full thing if you want answers.
not just copy and paste to suite

acturaly

learn to actually spell you illiterate ***** :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

sydneyfc wrote:

Australia vs Netherlands was watched by 5.6 million Americans alone



So a state of Origin rating of 4 million is insignificant in comparison, miniscule really.

& an Oi League game & its 47,000 veiwers
even more so eh fuckhead

leagueiscrap wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And RL has under half the games of the AFL on FTA with only 1 live a week, I think you idiots should just shut up, you are looking pathetic seeing as RL out here wins yet ch9 is still living in the 19th century in regards to sports broadcasting.

yes parra

if the NRL had another 14 FTA games a season that the VFL has .. they have 92 ... we have 78
& an extra 7 games in total to match the VFL's number of 199.. 4 of them would be FTA too

then I think the NRL gets them by a million or 2

add our rep games
& its embarrassing for the fumblers
just .. plain .... embarrassing with us winning by nearly 20 million veiwers
now to pop a cherry on that cream cake
put all our games on pay just like them

its 25 Million !!

the difference is dribble dick, channel 9 pick their games and show them in prime time for the best ratings possible. ?

ah no
the difference would be 25 million veiwers fucktard

K

Raiderdave wrote:

leagueiscrap wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

ParraEelsNRL wrote:

And RL has under half the games of the AFL on FTA with only 1 live a week, I think you idiots should just shut up, you are looking pathetic seeing as RL out here wins yet ch9 is still living in the 19th century in regards to sports broadcasting.

yes parra

if the NRL had another 14 FTA games a season that the VFL has .. they have 92 ... we have 78
& an extra 7 games in total to match the VFL's number of 199.. 4 of them would be FTA too

then I think the NRL gets them by a million or 2

add our rep games
& its embarrassing for the fumblers
just .. plain .... embarrassing with us winning by nearly 20 million veiwers
now to pop a cherry on that cream cake
put all our games on pay just like them

its 25 Million !!

the difference is dribble dick, channel 9 pick their games and show them in prime time for the best ratings possible. ?

ah no
the difference would be 25 million veiwers fucktard

K

not a chance dribble dick dave
more made up imanginery figures