Skills Required in AFL and NRL

Which is the best football code? Here you can have it out with other football fans.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Xman »

enarelle wrote:
I think it is very unfair of the League people to criticize the AFL participants. We need to understand that the AFL has very little experience in picking "representative" players and it shows.
That or the AFL dont care for a contest that compares a single player from each sport.

Hodge and Ling were one of the biggest guys on the show and theyre just average sized midfielders in our sport. Were the winners average sized in their sports? Hardly.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
enarelle
Seniors
Seniors
Reactions:
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:33 pm
Team:
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by enarelle »

So the other sports were smarter in who they picked.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Xman »

enarelle wrote:
So the other sports were smarter in who they picked.
or actually cared.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
enarelle wrote:
I think it is very unfair of the League people to criticize the AFL participants. We need to understand that the AFL has very little experience in picking "representative" players and it shows.
That or the AFL dont care for a contest that compares a single player from each sport.

Hodge and Ling were one of the biggest guys on the show .

wot the F'ing hell did I post earlier you half wit

wot has size got to do with it ?
again

who's faster over 100m
Slater
or Inglis


just because your big lumbering lolly legged slugs are slow & lethargic
doesn't mean our stars of a similar size.. or even bigger NRL guys .. are

hell .. I'd back big dave taylor to catch any VFL player you'd care to put up
he can cover 100m in about 12 seconds
& hes .... 126kgs :wink:

no speed
no strength
no agility
no skill

this is your average VFL player in comparison to our NRL guys .. Australias greatest athletes :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
enarelle wrote:
So the other sports were smarter in who they picked.
or actually cared.

or simply had a lot more athletic contestants to choose from :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

look its quite clear

if a TV show called ... Australias greatest half marathon run for footballers ... but thats it .. no power or agility events included
... was put on

our skinny little VFL runt players would probably win

as thats all they have
pick up a dumbell or cover 40m in 5 secs ..... as we know .. female netballers would beat them :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
look its quite clear

if a TV show called ... Australias greatest half marathon run for footballers ... but thats it .. no power or agility events included
... was put on

our skinny little VFL runt players would probably win

as thats all they have
pick up a dumbell or cover 40m in 5 secs ..... as we know .. female netballers would beat them :lol: :lol: :lol:
and if there was a contest called Australias most overweight and immobile athletes the NRL would win hands down. Youve won with Slater only. Where are the rest of your overweight loserrs?
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
enarelle wrote:
I think it is very unfair of the League people to criticize the AFL participants. We need to understand that the AFL has very little experience in picking "representative" players and it shows.
That or the AFL dont care for a contest that compares a single player from each sport.

Hodge and Ling were one of the biggest guys on the show .

wot the F'ing hell did I post earlier you half wit

wot has size got to do with it ?
again

who's faster over 100m
Slater
or Inglis


just because your big lumbering lolly legged slugs are slow & lethargic
doesn't mean our stars of a similar size.. or even bigger NRL guys .. are

hell .. I'd back big dave taylor to catch any VFL player you'd care to put up
he can cover 100m in about 12 seconds
& hes .... 126kgs :wink:

no speed
no strength
no agility
no skill

this is your average VFL player in comparison to our NRL guys .. Australias greatest athletes :wink:
Who the hell is Inglish? :-k

As I said, put some of your overweight forwards on next time and lets see how they fair. The show favours smaller leaner athletes and they've done better every year.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
Beaussie
Site Admin
Site Admin
Reactions:
Posts: 9681
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Team: Sydney Swans
Location: Sydney

Re: Skills Required in AFL and NRL

Post by Beaussie »

This thread needed to be created / split from the NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights thread as it doesn't appear to have anything to do with tv rights from the OP onwards. It's moreso about skills required in the AFL and NRL from what I can gather.

Dogs please feel free to change the title of the thread if you like by clicking the edit button within your first post in this thread. :wink:

Carry on people.
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
look its quite clear

if a TV show called ... Australias greatest half marathon run for footballers ... but thats it .. no power or agility events included
... was put on

our skinny little VFL runt players would probably win

as thats all they have
pick up a dumbell or cover 40m in 5 secs ..... as we know .. female netballers would beat them :lol: :lol: :lol:
and if there was a contest called Australias most overweight and immobile athletes the NRL would win hands down. Youve won with Slater only. Where are the rest of your overweight loserrs?
NRL players are
bigger
faster
stronger
more skillfull

VFL players .... good trotters ... they can plod all day ....:lol: :lol: :lol:
but thats it :wink:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
Raiderdave
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 16683
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
Team: Canberra
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Raiderdave »

Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
That or the AFL dont care for a contest that compares a single player from each sport.

Hodge and Ling were one of the biggest guys on the show .

wot the F'ing hell did I post earlier you half wit

wot has size got to do with it ?
again

who's faster over 100m
Slater
or Inglis


just because your big lumbering lolly legged slugs are slow & lethargic
doesn't mean our stars of a similar size.. or even bigger NRL guys .. are

hell .. I'd back big dave taylor to catch any VFL player you'd care to put up
he can cover 100m in about 12 seconds
& hes .... 126kgs :wink:

no speed
no strength
no agility
no skill

this is your average VFL player in comparison to our NRL guys .. Australias greatest athletes :wink:
Who the hell is Inglish? :-k

As I said, put some of your overweight forwards on next time and lets see how they fair. The show favours smaller leaner athletes and they've done better every year.

why would we do that ?

you said your blokes were too big ..... I said park em along side Inglis .. hes big

would they go any better ?

8-[ :-k #-o

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million

Sookerwhos V Japan 238K :lol:
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 12787
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:

Re: Skills Required in AFL and NRL

Post by King-Eliagh »

:lol:
Raiderdave wrote:
VFL players .... good trotters ... they can plod all day ....


:lol: funny and also true...in comparison to the explosive excitement machines getting round in the NRL.
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
Pete_09
Seniors
Seniors
Reactions:
Posts: 322
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:51 pm
Team: Brisbane Lions
Location:

Re: Skills Required in AFL and NRL

Post by Pete_09 »

Raiderdave why are u calling the AFL VFL??

I am pretty sure there are more Footy players outside of VIC than there are Thugby players outside of NSW.

You are one stupid jealous person!!

Go the NSWRL hahaha
User avatar
Xman
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 13919
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 7:09 pm
Team: Essendon
Location:

Re: NRL to reap $1.2b from TV rights

Post by Xman »

Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:

wot the F'ing hell did I post earlier you half wit

wot has size got to do with it ?
again

who's faster over 100m
Slater
or Inglis


just because your big lumbering lolly legged slugs are slow & lethargic
doesn't mean our stars of a similar size.. or even bigger NRL guys .. are

hell .. I'd back big dave taylor to catch any VFL player you'd care to put up
he can cover 100m in about 12 seconds
& hes .... 126kgs :wink:

no speed
no strength
no agility
no skill

this is your average VFL player in comparison to our NRL guys .. Australias greatest athletes :wink:
Who the hell is Inglish? :-k

As I said, put some of your overweight forwards on next time and lets see how they fair. The show favours smaller leaner athletes and they've done better every year.

why would we do that ?

you said your blokes were too big ..... I said park em along side Inglis .. hes big

would they go any better ?

8-[ :-k #-o

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Buddy Franklin, Nick Nat, and many others would easily eclipse Inlish. But that's not the pnt. The point is the results have favored smaller leaner contestants, irrespective of the sport. Look how lote tiqiri did. :roll: wasn't he a RL player? Look how Wendell sailor did? :lol: wasn't he an NRL player.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
User avatar
King-Eliagh
Coach
Coach
Reactions:
Posts: 12787
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 7:23 pm
Team: Parramatta
Location:

Re: Skills Required in AFL and NRL

Post by King-Eliagh »

Buddy Frannklin... Nic Natanui... vs Inglis?

Speed/100metre sprint: Inglis by 1.5-2.5 seconds
Strength/any test: Inglis by a country mile. The comparison between a lion and a domestic cat would be appropriate here
Agility/sideways movement test + other agility tests: A little closer but Inglis comfortably
Skill: difficult to test as the skills required are quite different for both sports. Gotta be fair and say equal here. they're all at the top of their respective sports for a reason.

I've seen a lot of both codes and am very confident of the above assessment. Very confident. :)
Image

xman wrote:
KE, why is an even comp important?
Post Reply