Talking Footy

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

I guess there won't be 1600 people using it

The facts are:

- Leichhardt council asked for EOI (these are usually pretty informal, pretty much just to see who is in the mix)
- AFL NSW/ACT responded by providing details from a basic postcode search.
- For the formal submission the council requested more detailed information, specifically regarding registered players.
- AFL NSW/ACT provided said details, but also pointed out that the lack of a ground in the area meant that many people were forced to go outside of the area to play.

Nevertheless AFL NSW/ACT received basically what they applied for despite the Sydney media claiming they lost their bid.

justanotherleaguefan wrote:

Gws/Skoda stadium

Who are averaging more than the roosters and panthers.....in RL heartland!

I think JALF just had a premature ejaculation. Look at the Swan's numbers in the 80's they were quite similar to GWS. Give them time and they will come.

The future of the big bad AFL let us, what is how do we do, I am scarred.

what?

infoleather wrote:

The future of the big bad AFL let us, what is how do we do, I am scarred.

You need to read what you write down to make sure it makes sense before you post it mate. Either that or dont drink so much.

piesman2011 wrote:

infoleather wrote:

The future of the big bad AFL let us, what is how do we do, I am scarred.

You need to read what you write down to make sure it makes sense before you post it mate. Either that or dont drink so much.

You tell the new guys hows its done Pies... =D>

eelofwest wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

infoleather wrote:

The future of the big bad AFL let us, what is how do we do, I am scarred.

You need to read what you write down to make sure it makes sense before you post it mate. Either that or dont drink so much.

You tell the new guys hows its done Pies... =D>

Well you shouldn't that's for sure!