Talking Footy

King-Eliagh wrote:

note the lack of detail on how many teams are on few wins

The AFL got a whole league goin on down there!

They cant see the Forest for the trees.

My pleasure!

Jesus look at the cuddling session going on above. Get a room cowboys, this is the fight club not the 'pleasure' chest

And try looking at the title of the thread to ascertain its meaning for a change ya pair of breeding clowns. It says "AFL" and therefore is clearly not inclusive of the bumpkin yokel teams you numbskulls have drummed up. Comprehension folks, get some sometime :D

BULLSHIT!! This is a basketcase thread, right? The three clubs that TLPG added are BASKETCASES!! Eliagh's list are NOT basketcases!!

So either you reverse your stupid decision, or you delete this thread! Your choice!

BTW, AFL is AFL. GWS, Kilburn, whatever!!

It's all AFL. That's a fact. AFL Victoria. AFL Tasmania. AFL Queensland. And so on. It is all encompassing and to say different is to be totally ignorant.

So no one can say anything at all?

The_Wookie wrote:

Deleted a number of posts with no relevance to the topic at hand. Note this was foreshadowed in my first post in this thread where i specifically asked that this not include random country teams. You've seen fit to ignore it. And since you've chosen to carry on like idiots, your posts are gone.

Poor decision, and it exonerates KE's poor definition of what constitutes a basketcase. If this is to be a true "Basketcase League", genuine basketcases should be included. Otherwise why even have it to begin with? That's why it is perfectly relevant to the topic at hand.

Are you saying that any of the six clubs are on field basketcases, Wookie? If so please provide your reasoning for this. Note I said "on" field, not off field (which would be off topic on this thread).

TLPG wrote:

The_Wookie wrote:

Deleted a number of posts with no relevance to the topic at hand. Note this was foreshadowed in my first post in this thread where i specifically asked that this not include random country teams. You've seen fit to ignore it. And since you've chosen to carry on like idiots, your posts are gone.

Poor decision, and it exonerates KE's poor definition of what constitutes a basketcase. If this is to be a true "Basketcase League", genuine basketcases should be included. Otherwise why even have it to begin with? That's why it is perfectly relevant to the topic at hand.

Are you saying that any of the six clubs are on field basketcases, Wookie? If so please provide your reasoning for this. Note I said "on" field, not off field (which would be off topic on this thread).

Oh for fuck! Jesus wept Mary and Joseph! the thread title also says "league" ya dumb dipshit pony!!! Man you and comprehension are like Abbott and climate change. Get a fukkin grip ya fukkin donkey!

The definition of basketcase on the field does not require evidence from within the AFL. "Basketcase" is a wider term than that which is not limited to the professional level, as you put it. Therefore I did not introduce a random element. I introduced specific examples from within the sport that demonstrate clearly that none of the AFL clubs that KE has nominated are basketcases. In order to be a basketcase, the club must be completely without chance of winning to the point of being destroyed on the field by every other club without exception in that competition. The percentage is a perfect guide. None of KE's teams fulfill this criteria. The examples I gave do fulfill it. It is a valid demonstration and perfectly legit in a fighting environment to slam KE's assertion to the wall in whatever means are needed to prove the point.

Wookie, you are preventing a fair level of freedom with your decision - which in fact is exactly what Cracker did and that is what pissed everyone (except for NRLC) off. Derailing threads happens all the time in here, and you said it yourself. You'll only prevent personal abuse (including the revealing of personal information) and that's okay. But by doing this, you're going to Cracker's level.

KE, accept that what I have been doing shows that your BBL should drop one B, because there are no basketcases in the AFL. I have proven this by showing you genuine basketcases. You're the one squealing for the WAHmbulance (AKA Wookie's protection from the truth as it would seem at the moment).

Listen here tlpg ya big hairy impotent snotball

The only reason my blithering basketcasers have a % over 50 is because there's a whole friggin 'league' of em in the 'AFL'

Your scrounging round amateur bush leagues to find worse one off cases is quite telling of your limp fighting character.

I win, with or without wookies deletions

Nice win by the basketcase GC over the top 4 contender today.

'Twas a nice win but gents, let's not get a woody about it eh. Geelong played awwwful, as they did when I saw the swans whoop em by 110. We all know Geelong are capable of playing like a pack of drunken donkeys, as they did again today.

Your so wrong in so many ways. I do smirk when I read such comments though wondering when the line between trying to save face and being exposed as a fool is undistinguishable

So tell me freddy me boy, when was the last time you heard someone try and pick the bottom five correctly 3 seasons straight? Cause if I get five this year that'll be what I've done :D

Yeeeeaaaahh

Bottom 5 is it now lol