Page 3 of 3

Re: DANK ON ABC 1 TONIGHT ON 7.30

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:50 pm
by Xman
King-Eliagh wrote:
Hahah you're not far off there Xman. Petes pretty right too... But me thinks its essendon who are rife with the stink whether the playrs know it or not someone at that clubs fed the whole team.
Allegedly

Many very confident people around the club think that this will be nothing :wink:

Re: DANK ON ABC 1 TONIGHT ON 7.30

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:55 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
2 AFL teams to 6 NRL teams. [-X
and about 12 NRL players

to the VFL's 41

under investigation
i'd say the vfl is so far from not being out of the woods ... it aint funny :wink:
Rubbish. Essendon players, if guilty, were said to be unaware of any PEDs they were given
.
thats not a defence
you are ultimately responsible for what you take ..... you can't be forced to take something against your will
& if there is no dilligence on the individuals part to find out what is being offered , what they are being told to take
then the blame lies with the player

I trusted it wasn't a PED .. is not a defence


Essenmonga ... gooooonnnnneeeeeeeee :cool:

Re: DANK ON ABC 1 TONIGHT ON 7.30

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:59 pm
by Xman
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
and about 12 NRL players

to the VFL's 41

under investigation
i'd say the vfl is so far from not being out of the woods ... it aint funny :wink:
Rubbish. Essendon players, if guilty, were said to be unaware of any PEDs they were given
.
thats not a defence
you are ultimately responsible for what you take ..... you can't be forced to take something against your will
& if there is no dilligence on the individuals part to find out what is being offered , what they are being told to take
then the blame lies with the player

I trusted it wasn't a PED .. is not a defence


Essenmonga ... gooooonnnnneeeeeeeee :cool:
Agree, ASADA won't care. However if the players followed correct procedure and did everything they could to ensure the supplements were legal I'm not sure they deserve derision.

But we will see. I'm very confident actually :wink:

Re: DANK ON ABC 1 TONIGHT ON 7.30

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:11 pm
by Raiderdave
Xman wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Xman wrote:
Rubbish. Essendon players, if guilty, were said to be unaware of any PEDs they were given
.
thats not a defence
you are ultimately responsible for what you take ..... you can't be forced to take something against your will
& if there is no dilligence on the individuals part to find out what is being offered , what they are being told to take
then the blame lies with the player

I trusted it wasn't a PED .. is not a defence


Essenmonga ... gooooonnnnneeeeeeeee :cool:
Agree, ASADA won't care. However if the players followed correct procedure and did everything they could to ensure the supplements were legal I'm not sure they deserve derision.

But we will see. I'm very confident actually :wink:
one phone call to the VFL players association
we're being told to take something .. & while we're being told its ok , its being injected into us & seems a bit dodge & so we're a bit wary

VFL players association .... get us a sample & we'll have it tested
in the meantime
take nothing

every they could marcus

no... not quite everything [-X [-X [-X

Re: DANK ON ABC 1 TONIGHT ON 7.30

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:23 pm
by Xman
It apparently was endorsed by Bruce Reid, one of the most respected sports doctors in Australia. Add to that all the coaching staff. The consent apparently confirmed the supplements were checked against WADA policy. I would have thought that was due diligence. The only way I can see this going wrong is if Danks went rogue.

Re: DANK ON ABC 1 TONIGHT ON 7.30

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:16 am
by piesman2011
King-Eliagh wrote:
thats disgusting pies. I'm disappointed in you. pete smells dodgy, just like the entire essendon footy club

Sorry about that I thought we were getting in on the cheap personal attacks, so I thought I would get one in early. :cry: :cry:

Re: DANK ON ABC 1 TONIGHT ON 7.30

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:22 am
by piesman2011
Xman wrote:
It apparently was endorsed by Bruce Reid, one of the most respected sports doctors in Australia. Add to that all the coaching staff. The consent apparently confirmed the supplements were checked against WADA policy. I would have thought that was due diligence. The only way I can see this going wrong is if Danks went rogue.

Thats the question isnt it Xman. Was Dank doing something dodgy to make himself look good. Essendon was on top of the ladder after about 8 or 9 rounds,which was quite suprising comsidering their injuries at that time and also many wouldnt consider them to be the most talented list(quite subjective).
Another consideration is that Dank and Robinson were in on it together.
The least likely event would be that the whole team and club was involved.
The most likely is that the club will come up innocent IMO.