Talking Footy

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

They should do one for Robert Lui after he repeatedly hits his girlfriend whether she's pregnant or not.

"That's disgusting Robert, isn't it?"

"Maybe. I didn't get arrested for it or the sack from my club and as I'm a thugby minda I can't learn from my own mistakes. So if the punishment isn't severe I'm likely to strike again."

didn't an adelaide crows players bash up his pregnant girlfriend a few years ago
spock .. or someone ?
only got a 4 week suspension for this vile ... low .. appalling act

meanwhile Lui has been de registered completely by the NRL , if he ever gets to play again ... by the time he does , his penalty will be paramount to a 2 year 48 game suspension ..

look at the difference in the punishments .............. are the VFL kidding ?
both players ought to be banned for life
but at least one code is serious about violence toward women .... & the other is full of hot air ... & BS , like it is about most things.

ermm Raiderdave... she wasn't pregnant and he only did it once. Lui did it twice and seems unstoppable! How long until he strikes again?

oh ..... he only did it once ... that makes it alright then

Violence against anyone is wrong (unless its a sport where you need to hit someone to win). People trying to say hitting a pregnant woman is worse then hitting a non-pregnant woman are only deluding themselves.

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

didn't an adelaide crows players bash up his pregnant girlfriend a few years ago
spock .. or someone ?
only got a 4 week suspension for this vile ... low .. appalling act

meanwhile Lui has been de registered completely by the NRL , if he ever gets to play again ... by the time he does , his penalty will be paramount to a 2 year 48 game suspension ..

look at the difference in the punishments .............. are the VFL kidding ?
both players ought to be banned for life
but at least one code is serious about violence toward women .... & the other is full of hot air ... & BS , like it is about most things.

ermm Raiderdave... she wasn't pregnant and he only did it once. Lui did it twice and seems unstoppable! How long until he strikes again?

oh ..... he only did it once ... that makes it alright then

Hitting a pregnant woman is worse though as you are risking two lives rather than one.

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

No point talking to Stewie the guy would happily line up NRL players and run them down like Qlders do to Cane toads. You might as well try to convince RaiderDave that the AFL are not Satan

piesman2011 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

No point talking to Stewie the guy would happily line up NRL players and run them down like Qlders do to Cane toads. You might as well try to convince RaiderDave that the AFL are not Satan

Would it even be possible to run over some of the fat shits in nRL like George Rose? I think that would do more damage to my car than it would to him!

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

While his behaviour was poor did he force her to take the drugs or did she take them herself?

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

While his behaviour was poor did he force her to take the drugs or did she take them herself?

Exactly. Ablett's intention wasn't to kill her (if he even supplied her with drugs in the first place) where as Lui's intention was to cause harm to his partner.... twice.

Stewie wrote:

piesman2011 wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

No point talking to Stewie the guy would happily line up NRL players and run them down like Qlders do to Cane toads. You might as well try to convince RaiderDave that the AFL are not Satan

Would it even be possible to run over some of the fat shits in nRL like George Rose? I think that would do more damage to my car than it would to him!

george would probably get up ..... hes a man mountain
& it'd be bye bye spewie shortly after as he's shoved up the cars exhaust pipe

you could hit most scrawny stick insect vfl players with a pram .... & it'd be RIP

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

While his behaviour was poor did he force her to take the drugs or did she take them herself?

oh it was only ..poor was it ............ FMD , the delusion is rabbid amongst this lot

Stewie wrote:

Xman wrote:

King-Eliagh wrote:

Hey Stewie what about the man AFL fans call 'God' providing drugs to a teenager who subsequently od'd and died? That one hit your list of 'high risk'?

While his behaviour was poor did he force her to take the drugs or did she take them herself?

Exactly. Ablett's intention wasn't to kill her (if he even supplied her with drugs in the first place) where as Lui's intention was to cause harm to his partner.... twice.

so people who deal & or supply drugs to kids who subsequently over dose .... bare no responsibility then ?

you aren't smart enough to be a c.ock head

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Xman wrote:

While his behaviour was poor did he force her to take the drugs or did she take them herself?

Exactly. Ablett's intention wasn't to kill her (if he even supplied her with drugs in the first place) where as Lui's intention was to cause harm to his partner.... twice.

so people who deal & or supply drugs to kids who subsequently over dose .... bare no responsibility then ?

you aren't smart enough to be a c.ock head

He was an addict. She took drugs by her own volition. His behaviour was consistent with an addict, which was poor, but she made her choice

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Stewie wrote:

Exactly. Ablett's intention wasn't to kill her (if he even supplied her with drugs in the first place) where as Lui's intention was to cause harm to his partner.... twice.

so people who deal & or supply drugs to kids who subsequently over dose .... bare no responsibility then ?

you aren't smart enough to be a c.ock head

He was an addict. She took drugs by her own volition. His behaviour was consistent with an addict, which was poor, but she made her choice

his behaviour was consistent with a piece of human filth who gave drugs to a kid who would barely of known any better
...... who just so happens to be a great VFL player
no suprises one goes hand in hand with the other

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

so people who deal & or supply drugs to kids who subsequently over dose .... bare no responsibility then ?

you aren't smart enough to be a c.ock head

He was an addict. She took drugs by her own volition. His behaviour was consistent with an addict, which was poor, but she made her choice

his behaviour was consistent with a piece of human filth who gave drugs to a kid who would barely of known any better
...... who just so happens to be a great VFL player
no suprises one goes hand in hand with the other

He chose to do drugs just like Andrew Johns. The fact he shared drugs with someone who died isnt really his fault. He should be judged on his habit and lifestyle, not on her equally poor choices. She was 20 FFS! Isnt that old enough to make your own choices in life?

Xman wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Xman wrote:

He was an addict. She took drugs by her own volition. His behaviour was consistent with an addict, which was poor, but she made her choice

his behaviour was consistent with a piece of human filth who gave drugs to a kid who would barely of known any better
...... who just so happens to be a great VFL player
no suprises one goes hand in hand with the other

He chose to do drugs just like Andrew Johns. The fact he shared drugs with someone who died isnt really his fault. He should be judged on his habit and lifestyle, not on her equally poor choices. She was 20 FFS! Isnt that old enough to make your own choices in life?

Joey Johns wasn't a sleazy needle injecting junkie
nor was he a gutless addict ... nor did anyone die as a result of his shortcomings as a human being

the worst choice this young lady ( a kid really ) ever made ...was hanging around with that disgrace .. that pig of a man.. who gave her drugs which killed her
injected her . he did ... he should be behind bars . no different to being drunk behind the wheel .. driving & your passenger being killed as a result
.. but he committed the crime in Victoria .... a low corrupt hole where VFL players can litterally commit murder ..& get off

how this ... scum... continues to be adored by the gronks that follow your sport
is sickening ... vile ...& shameful ... & says so much about them as well

the fact the VFL STILL inducted to its hall of fame .. is vomit inducing
but hardly surprising from this low .. low organisation

for shame
for shame