Lol
So according to Swines
Its astounding that the NRL lavish praise on someone who has allegations against them .
What about praise for MICKEY O
He was made Swans ambassador .
Care to comment.
Also this
But a certain hypocracy exists in NRL HQ in being able to lavish praise on a RL immortal yet not even comment on serious hystorical sex abuse charges level against Langlands .
Oh dear
But a certain hypocrisy exists in AFL HQ in being able to lavish praise on aAFLOL legend yet not even comment on serious sex abuse allegations levelled at MICKEY O .
Only hypocrisy here is yours Swines
Pathetic
Absolutely pathetic
Why is the NRL putting it head in the sand over Langlands?
-
- Coach
- Posts: 18893
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 9:49 am
- Team: The Scottish Puffins
- Location:
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been liked: 75 times
Re: Why is the NRL putting it head in the sand over Langlands?
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
- Has thanked: 0
- Been liked: 0
Re: Why is the NRL putting it head in the sand over Langlands?
1st all you posted was CONJECTURE none were charged! Langlands was CHARGED!AFLcrap1 wrote: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:00 pmLol
So according to Swines
Its astounding that the NRL lavish praise on someone who has allegations against them .
What about praise for MICKEY O
He was made Swans ambassador .
Care to comment.
Also this
But a certain hypocracy exists in NRL HQ in being able to lavish praise on a RL immortal yet not even comment on serious hystorical sex abuse charges level against Langlands .
Oh dear
But a certain hypocrisy exists in AFL HQ in being able to lavish praise on aAFLOL legend yet not even comment on serious sex abuse allegations levelled at MICKEY O .
Only hypocrisy here is yours Swines
Pathetic
Absolutely pathetic
2nd gunna post something thats in the last 10 years????? Pretty disengenious to post ancient history, I was posting something current that RL HQ have not even had the courtesy to comment on. Talk about strawman arguments, I could trawl through history finding allegations with both codes.
I made it clear that I was not commenting on whether he was guilty or innocent, that I was not blaming the NRL for the allegations ONLY their failure to acknowledge the allegations.
Even all those years ago Demetrio's comments acknowledged the allegation.
You have durectly proven my point you are prepared to dredge up anything to slung mud at the AFL and hold them to a different standard. (You have mentioned things li ke the above time and time again) When something like the above comes up its suddenly excuses. You are the height of hypocracy!
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
-
- Coach
- Posts: 4814
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:19 pm
- Team: Wests Tigers
- Location:
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been liked: 175 times
Re: Why is the NRL putting it head in the sand over Langlands?
You're pathetic pal. In fact you're a coward. This thread should be bumped. It's a cowardly attack on a dead man who never had the chance to defend himself against spurious allegations. Disgrace.
- leeroy*NRL*
- Moderator
- Posts: 6907
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 2:54 pm
- Team: St George Illawarra Dragons
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 335 times
- Been liked: 74 times
Re: Why is the NRL putting it head in the sand over Langlands?
you know what..Terry wrote: Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:09 amYou're pathetic pal. In fact you're a coward. This thread should be bumped. It's a cowardly attack on a dead man who never had the chance to defend himself against spurious allegations. Disgrace.
I actually totally agree...
sorry Swannies but I totally disagree with this thread>>
(LOCKED THREAD)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 6 guests