Page 2 of 2
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 2:16 am
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol a 3 yr old article . Nothing to do with the NRL just Some old bloke thinks players could wear gloves .
Keep grasping at straws
lol like usual when it suits you youll use an article not from this week, when it doesnt, you mock it off! like usual selective hyprcrite fuckstick
"Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors"
they only have to catch the ball from a 5 meter throw
a rubber ball FFS then they fumble it several times, most the time they don't even have an opponent
Bhaaaaa
Can you show me anywhere where the NRL were asked or spoke about using gloves in that article .
I'll wait.
It's a pretty funny article! All that fumbling that goes in in the nrlol! The ********* struggle to catch a 5 meter side ways throw from a ball much larger than a AFL ball, with out an opponent
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 5:00 am
by AFLcrap1
leagueiscrap wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol a 3 yr old article . Nothing to do with the NRL just Some old bloke thinks players could wear gloves .
Keep grasping at straws
lol like usual when it suits you youll use an article not from this week, when it doesnt, you mock it off! like usual selective hyprcrite fuckstick
"Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors"
they only have to catch the ball from a 5 meter throw
a rubber ball FFS then they fumble it several times, most the time they don't even have an opponent
Bhaaaaa
Can you show me anywhere where the NRL were asked or spoke about using gloves in that article .
I'll wait.
It's a pretty funny article! All that fumbling that goes in in the nrlol! The ********* struggle to catch a 5 meter side ways throw from a ball much larger than a AFL ball, with out an opponent
So that's a no . Nothing to do with the NRL .
Just some old bloke wanting his 15 mins of fame .
Thanks for clearing that up
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 6:38 am
by leagueiscrap
AFLcrap1 wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:AFLcrap1 wrote:
Lol a 3 yr old article . Nothing to do with the NRL just Some old bloke thinks players could wear gloves .
Keep grasping at straws
lol like usual when it suits you youll use an article not from this week, when it doesnt, you mock it off! like usual selective hyprcrite fuckstick
"Calls being made for NRL players to use American football-style gloves to reduce handling errors"
they only have to catch the ball from a 5 meter throw
a rubber ball FFS then they fumble it several times, most the time they don't even have an opponent
Bhaaaaa
Can you show me anywhere where the NRL were asked or spoke about using gloves in that article .
I'll wait.
It's a pretty funny article! All that fumbling that goes in in the nrlol! The ********* struggle to catch a 5 meter side ways throw from a ball much larger than a AFL ball, with out an opponent
So that's a no . Nothing to do with the NRL .
Just some old bloke wanting his 15 mins of fame .
Thanks for clearing that up
he makes a pretty true and funny point!
just stating the obvious what a bunch of ********* the NRLOL players are
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 7:38 am
by Swans4ever
I just think this whole thread is a bit pointless - AFL fumbling ball is not against the rules and therefore no slur. NRL who can't drop the ball FWD but can drop it backwards make this slur. As I said before I am happy to be called a fumbler, rather that than bumsniffer!!!!
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 12:34 pm
by ParraEelsNRL
That's just your homosexual side coming out again, you like to both fumble the balls and sniff them.
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Mon May 09, 2016 8:54 pm
by Swans4ever
ParraEelsNRL wrote:That's just your homosexual side coming out again, you like to both fumble the balls and sniff them.
But you blokes are the ones that shove your heads between other blokes sweaty arses - hahaha must like it!
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Tue May 10, 2016 8:46 am
by leagueiscrap
ParraEelsNRL wrote:That's just your homosexual side coming out again, you like to both fumble the balls and sniff them.
isnt that what league is? pointless scrums, poke your fingure up his bum, play with his knob, him him a sack wack? watch your opponent fumble the ball from a short pass then jump on him
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 12:01 am
by NRL&NFLweLaughATafl
leagueiscrap wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:That's just your homosexual side coming out again, you like to both fumble the balls and sniff them.
isnt that what league is? pointless scrums, poke your fingure up his bum, play with his knob, him him a sack wack? watch your opponent fumble the ball from a short pass then jump on him
All AFL players ever do is tackle men from behind wearing very little clothing.
I have no issue with homosexuals what so ever though. But AFL is clearly more popular with this demographic in Sydney.
You just have to look at the Swans fanbase. They are a huge part of Sydney gay community. And I think it is great gay men have a team they can follow passionately like the Sydney Swans.
Might explain why cheerleaders never survived in AFL but still popular in NRL and NFL.
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Tue May 17, 2016 6:52 pm
by leagueiscrap
NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:That's just your homosexual side coming out again, you like to both fumble the balls and sniff them.
isnt that what league is? pointless scrums, poke your fingure up his bum, play with his knob, him him a sack wack? watch your opponent fumble the ball from a short pass then jump on him
All AFL players ever do is tackle men from behind wearing very little clothing.
I have no issue with homosexuals what so ever though. But AFL is clearly more popular with this demographic in Sydney.
You just have to look at the Swans fanbase. They are a huge part of Sydney gay community. And I think it is great gay men have a team they can follow passionately like the Sydney Swans.
Might explain why cheerleaders never survived in AFL but still popular in NRL and NFL.
yes.............
thickshit no2 your nurse will be in shortly with the next dose of those meds
Re: who should be more entitled to the useage of fumblers
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 2:58 pm
by Swans4ever
NRL&NFLweLaughATafl wrote:leagueiscrap wrote:ParraEelsNRL wrote:That's just your homosexual side coming out again, you like to both fumble the balls and sniff them.
isnt that what league is? pointless scrums, poke your fingure up his bum, play with his knob, him him a sack wack? watch your opponent fumble the ball from a short pass then jump on him
All AFL players ever do is tackle men from behind wearing very little clothing.
I have no issue with homosexuals what so ever though. But AFL is clearly more popular with this demographic in Sydney.
You just have to look at the Swans fanbase. They are a huge part of Sydney gay community. And I think it is great gay men have a team they can follow passionately like the Sydney Swans.
Might explain why cheerleaders never survived in AFL but still popular in NRL and NFL.
Yet it's rugby league men who like to digitally rape and fondle an opponent during a match (Hopoate and Reynolds!). Yes NRLwelaughatoursmallPenises it seems while we may have a following in the gay community (I doubt this is a fact and gar men are any more disposed to like AF over RL but I am not going to get into an argument over it!) The fact remains that RL is played by a great proportion of gay men still in the closet (IMO)!