Talking Footy

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Intelligence? You? The two terms go together like chicken salad and horse shit. If you were intelligent you'd recognise how much of a fool you just made of yourself.

This will be interesting. Explain for all to see how I have managed to do that and then maybe we won't all still think you are a 13 year old pimply kid.

Seriously I have house plants with a higher IQ than Crapper.
& they are not stinky either.

Why should I? You claim to be smart so you explain it!

Keep crying, Dave.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Intelligence? You? The two terms go together like chicken salad and horse shit. If you were intelligent you'd recognise how much of a fool you just made of yourself.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Why should I? You claim to be smart so you explain it!

You want me to explain your statement.

OK

It's a bunch of rubbish written by an idiot.

Clear enough for you Dumbo

BTW Just a heads up for you so that you won't look so illiterate recognize is spealt with a z not a s as you have done in your statement.


take the wager you gutless singlet wearing sheila

Phelpsy wrote:

Does anyone know how the nrl defined what a rl experience was when they stated 50000 people had a rl experience ? Did they operationalise this ?

its funny its an even 50k , it has to be a random number made up in an attempt for funding.
everything the AFL publishes the bumsniffers cry foul over, and claim the numbers are BS even though there is evidence to support it.
yet the heads of the NRL, publish an even number of 50 k with nothing to back it up. yet we are ment to believe it

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Why should I? You claim to be smart so you explain it!

Keep crying, Dave.

take the wager you gutless singlet wearing sheila

adamj1300 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Does anyone know how the nrl defined what a rl experience was when they stated 50000 people had a rl experience ? Did they operationalise this ?

, and claim the numbers are BS even though there is evidence to support it.

RL also has evidence it has 1.9 Million players in its ranks adding touch numbers
it is indeed the most played sport in our nation

another silver for the Victorian abortion

adamj1300 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Does anyone know how the nrl defined what a rl experience was when they stated 50000 people had a rl experience ? Did they operationalise this ?

its funny its an even 50k , it has to be a random number made up in an attempt for funding.
everything the AFL publishes the bumsniffers cry foul over, and claim the numbers are BS even though there is evidence to support it.
yet the heads of the NRL, publish an even number of 50 k with nothing to back it up. yet we are ment to believe it

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Spoken like a true brainwashed Derpball fan
Birchgrove oval...cough cough.
Yes Vlad we believe you.
20K registered players in NZ :_<> :_<>

cough cough Senate committee cough

MarkZZZ wrote:

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Intelligence? You? The two terms go together like chicken salad and horse shit. If you were intelligent you'd recognise how much of a fool you just made of yourself.

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Why should I? You claim to be smart so you explain it!

You want me to explain your statement.

OK

It's a bunch of rubbish written by an idiot.

Thought so. Clueless, and sinks to whining like Dave at the end as well just to prove it.

Raiderdave wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Does anyone know how the nrl defined what a rl experience was when they stated 50000 people had a rl experience ? Did they operationalise this ?

, and claim the numbers are BS even though there is evidence to support it.

RL also has evidence it has 1.9 Million players in its ranks adding touch numbers
it is indeed the most played sport in our nation

another silver for the Victorian abortion

the only person that has this evidence is you dave

AFLcrap1 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Does anyone know how the nrl defined what a rl experience was when they stated 50000 people had a rl experience ? Did they operationalise this ?

its funny its an even 50k , it has to be a random number made up in an attempt for funding.
everything the AFL publishes the bumsniffers cry foul over, and claim the numbers are BS even though there is evidence to support it.
yet the heads of the NRL, publish an even number of 50 k with nothing to back it up. yet we are ment to believe it

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Spoken like a true brainwashed Derpball fan
Birchgrove oval...cough cough.
Yes Vlad we believe you.
20K registered players in NZ :_<> :_<>

cough cough Senate committee cough

its more like you bumsniffers are brainwashed, what ever the tards down a bumsniffer headquater's come up you believe.
you take as gospel, no proof no evidence just made up numbers

a chest beating exercise for all the little insecure basement dwelling virgins

So you dont want to touch my post .
Just the usual deflection/waffle.
1 point for being UNCO & missing.

adamj1300 wrote:

AFLcrap1 wrote:

adamj1300 wrote:

Phelpsy wrote:

Does anyone know how the nrl defined what a rl experience was when they stated 50000 people had a rl experience ? Did they operationalise this ?

its funny its an even 50k , it has to be a random number made up in an attempt for funding.
everything the AFL publishes the bumsniffers cry foul over, and claim the numbers are BS even though there is evidence to support it.
yet the heads of the NRL, publish an even number of 50 k with nothing to back it up. yet we are ment to believe it

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
Spoken like a true brainwashed Derpball fan
Birchgrove oval...cough cough.
Yes Vlad we believe you.
20K registered players in NZ :_<> :_<>

cough cough Senate committee cough

its more like you bumsniffers are brainwashed, what ever the tards down a bumsniffer headquater's come up you believe.
you take as gospel, no proof no evidence just made up numbers

a chest beating exercise for all the little insecure basement dwelling virgins

:_<> :_<> :_<>
no argument
just
yeah I know I am but what are you ??

yaaaayyyyy Adam.. good comeback superman



spose we can't expect too much from posters with IQ levels of turnips through eh :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Can we ban Dave for posting his own ugly picture on here? :P :P :P :P :P

NRLCrap1 wrote:

Can we ban Dave for posting his own ugly picture on here? :P :P :P :P :P

take the wager you gutless singlet wearing sheila