Page 2 of 3

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:32 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
I was going to say that, Swans!
hey swans .I bet you feel dumber for knowing you & crapper think alike .

Be afraid ,very afraid.

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 6:53 pm
by NRLCrap1
Dave's talking in his usual manner again I see.

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:07 pm
by Raiderdave
adamj1300 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
so 552K touch players
245K tag players ( we'll own that sport too within 6 months :wink: )
& 600K RL players
And how many play all three meaning a triple count?

Plenty I'll bet!

Unlike the AFL numbers, Dave!
what the hell is the difference between touch rugby and tag rugby :-k

in touch you .... touch a ball carrier to make them play the ball
in tag .... you remove a Velcro tag attached to the hip .. to make the ball carrier play the ball

jesus :roll:
what rock do some of these fumblers live under :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<>

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:09 pm
by Raiderdave
pHyR3 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
so 552K touch players
245K tag players ( we'll own that sport too within 6 months :wink: )
& 600K RL players
And how many play all three meaning a triple count?

Plenty I'll bet!

Unlike the AFL numbers, Dave!
yup, you just give an AFL ball to a PE class and call it an even thousand.

you only have to fart in the same postcode where a sherrin might be ... & you're a ausfudge participant :?>

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:09 pm
by Swans4ever
AFLcrap1 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
I was going to say that, Swans!
hey swans .I bet you feel dumber for knowing you & crapper think alike .

Be afraid ,very afraid.
I'd be more Afraid for you - you think VERY similar to RD and we know what a demented NUPHY he is - but I suppose thats what you get if you grew up like bad boy bubby and was breast feed till the age of 21, I really that's not the case for you but there is an awful lot of RL fans that are just like him so you never know!

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:22 pm
by Raiderdave
Swans4ever wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
I was going to say that, Swans!
hey swans .I bet you feel dumber for knowing you & crapper think alike .

Be afraid ,very afraid.
- you think VERY similar to RD

hes a smart lad then aint he jizzbreath :wink:

he'd just need to be able to spell & add up & hes got your sorry arse covered :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<> :_<>

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:14 pm
by NRLCrap1
You're covering your own arse you mean, Dave! And ballsing it up!

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:38 pm
by AFLcrap1
NRLCrap1 wrote:
You're covering your own arse you mean, Dave! And ballsing it up!

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 6:00 pm
by pHyR3
AFLcrap1 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
You're covering your own arse you mean, Dave! And ballsing it up!
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>


:(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/ :(/

classic.

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 6:15 pm
by adamj1300
AFLcrap1 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
You're covering your own arse you mean, Dave! And ballsing it up!
is that what your doctor prescribed to you?

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 7:55 pm
by pHyR3
adamj1300 wrote:
AFLcrap1 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
You're covering your own arse you mean, Dave! And ballsing it up!
is that what your doctor prescribed to you?
solid comeback.

all the good banter comes from RD, parra and aflc haha

all the shitty ass comebacks come from NRLC, swans and adamj.

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

but both are equally funny

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 8:16 pm
by adamj1300
AFLcrap1 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
You're covering your own arse you mean, Dave! And ballsing it up!
ok then is what that your therapist told you to do with your opinion about RL

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 10:11 pm
by Swans4ever
Sorry but same really applies to everyone after all opinions are like arse holes - everyone's got one and they all stink! So it may be worthwhile you taking your own advice!

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:14 am
by NRLCrap1
Couldn't have said that better, Swans!

Re: Rugby league in the south not non-existent but just abou

Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 5:51 pm
by adamj1300
Raiderdave wrote:
adamj1300 wrote:
NRLCrap1 wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
so 552K touch players
245K tag players ( we'll own that sport too within 6 months :wink: )
& 600K RL players
And how many play all three meaning a triple count?

Plenty I'll bet!

Unlike the AFL numbers, Dave!
what the hell is the difference between touch rugby and tag rugby :-k

in touch you .... touch a ball carrier to make them play the ball
in tag .... you remove a Velcro tag attached to the hip .. to make the ball carrier play the ball

jesus :roll:
what rock do some of these fumblers live under :(/ :(/ :lol: :lol: :_<> :_<>
no dickhead dave, just because you think League is popular doesn't mean its true!
ive never heard of tag, only touch & yes its still a shit boring side ways throw ball rubbish