Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
Mod, can you explain to the littlest fumblefan that I was not having a discussion with it and that I actually told it to f u c k off and not to bother me anymore as I hate sooks and esp dobbers.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
If you don't like me, leave.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
Squeaaaaaaaaaaaak
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
Mr. Tourettes is back - thinks a sentence is a string of abuse.ParraEelsNRL wrote:don't ever talk to me againNSWAFL wrote:Oh oh, Debbie's back!
Nice try Cos.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
*unnacceptable
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
The Australian ay? Like the Storm and the NRL, owned by News Ltd.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Prove it.
I posted that info from the Australian from its business section and if need be, I can get the 2010 NRL state of the game report.
There lies, more lies and then there is complete bullshyte.
Real reliable source that one.

News Ltd

-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
Fat Pat huh?
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
Whoa! Beaussie I'll think you'll find that the Australian is a Fairfax newspaper.Beaussie wrote:The Australian ay? Like the Storm and the NRL, owned by News Ltd.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Prove it.
I posted that info from the Australian from its business section and if need be, I can get the 2010 NRL state of the game report.
There lies, more lies and then there is complete bullshyte.
Real reliable source that one.![]()
News Ltd
- Beaussie
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9681
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 6:38 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location: Sydney
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
You're wrong NSWAFL. See the following.NSWAFL wrote:Whoa! Beaussie I'll think you'll find that the Australian is a Fairfax newspaper.Beaussie wrote:The Australian ay? Like the Storm and the NRL, owned by News Ltd.ParraEelsNRL wrote:Prove it.
I posted that info from the Australian from its business section and if need be, I can get the 2010 NRL state of the game report.
There lies, more lies and then there is complete bullshyte.
Real reliable source that one.![]()
News Ltd
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/network
News Limited is one of Australia's largest media conglomerate companies, employing more than 8,000 staff nationwide and approximately 3,000 journalists. The publicly listed company's interests span newspaper and magazine publishing, Internet, Pay TV, National Rugby League, market research, DVD and film distribution, and film and television production trading assets.
As a part of News Corporation, News Limited operates 170 newspaper and magazine titles in Australia, including the following:
The Australian including weekly insert magazine The Deal and monthly insert magazine (wish)
The Weekend Australian including insert magazine The Weekend Australian Magazine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_Limited
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
Oh! I could have sworn it was Fairfax. Oh wel......
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:51 pm
- Team: Wests Tigers - Balmain - Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location: Westsern Sydney
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
"Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders"
Thanks, your thread was very informative. it has taught me alot about AFL, like...
1. AFL is mainly the anglo-aussie mans game,
2. New Zealanders who currently are the largest migrant nationality to australia each year are more likely to follow RL than AFL (even in VIC the AFLs mecca).
3. AFL fans do not consider increasing attendances as progress if those crowds makeup an increasing muliticultural fanbase. They probably consider it like those who dont follow AFL, 'Un-Australian'.
4. AFL supporters are more likely to make racist comments often without even realising it. Which puts me back to #1.
even anglo/caucasian migrants from NZ and UK are least likely to follow AFL. Only the occasional irishman. Not entirely his fault though
Thanks, your thread was very informative. it has taught me alot about AFL, like...
1. AFL is mainly the anglo-aussie mans game,
2. New Zealanders who currently are the largest migrant nationality to australia each year are more likely to follow RL than AFL (even in VIC the AFLs mecca).
3. AFL fans do not consider increasing attendances as progress if those crowds makeup an increasing muliticultural fanbase. They probably consider it like those who dont follow AFL, 'Un-Australian'.
4. AFL supporters are more likely to make racist comments often without even realising it. Which puts me back to #1.
even anglo/caucasian migrants from NZ and UK are least likely to follow AFL. Only the occasional irishman. Not entirely his fault though

"Wearing tight shorts is a bootable offense!"
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
AFL has similar indigenous Australian participation rates to the NRL.214Four wrote:"Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders"
Thanks, your thread was very informative. it has taught me alot about AFL, like...
1. AFL is mainly the anglo-aussie mans game,
2. New Zealanders who currently are the largest migrant nationality to australia each year are more likely to follow RL than AFL (even in VIC the AFLs mecca).
3. AFL fans do not consider increasing attendances as progress if those crowds makeup an increasing muliticultural fanbase. They probably consider it like those who dont follow AFL, 'Un-Australian'.
4. AFL supporters are more likely to make racist comments often without even realising it. Which puts me back to #1.
even anglo/caucasian migrants from NZ and UK are least likely to follow AFL. Only the occasional irishman. Not entirely his fault though

Your 4th comment is ridiculous and without substannce.

King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders
214Four wrote:"Crowds of 5-7k for Storm if it wasn't for New Zealanders"
Thanks, your thread was very informative. it has taught me alot about AFL, like...
1. AFL is mainly the anglo-aussie mans game,
2. New Zealanders who currently are the largest migrant nationality to australia each year are more likely to follow RL than AFL (even in VIC the AFLs mecca).
3. AFL fans do not consider increasing attendances as progress if those crowds makeup an increasing muliticultural fanbase. They probably consider it like those who dont follow AFL, 'Un-Australian'.
4. AFL supporters are more likely to make racist comments often without even realising it. Which puts me back to #1.
even anglo/caucasian migrants from NZ and UK are least likely to follow AFL. Only the occasional irishman. Not entirely his fault though



King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.