Talking Footy

Fred wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 7:39 pm

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 6:58 pm

azif wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 6:55 pm

if struggling to understand a topic was a prerequisite for contributing

then
your post count would be
0

your illiterate twat

asie from rubbish posts of nonsense and nicknames of turds, ****, racists & wanker! you have the mental capacity of a 12 yr old child that didnt finish junior school cant count past 6 and dont know the basics of not for profit organisations! lol

Well if that’s the case why do you engage?? Adds nothing to the site - rise above.

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:15 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 7:39 pm

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 6:58 pm

asie from rubbish posts of nonsense and nicknames of turds, ****, racists & wanker! you have the mental capacity of a 12 yr old child that didnt finish junior school cant count past 6 and dont know the basics of not for profit organisations! lol

Well if that’s the case why do you engage?? Adds nothing to the site - rise above.

I’m trying to see if he is really that stupid or can actually post anything useful

Fred wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:49 pm

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:15 pm

Fred wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 7:39 pm

Well if that’s the case why do you engage?? Adds nothing to the site - rise above.

I’m trying to see if he is really that stupid or can actually post anything useful

My advice - not that it wax sought - but …. I think you’re doing yourself no favours by engaging as you do -

Terry wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:04 am

WookieReturns wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:37 pm

this might go well here

That's very interesting sooks. But can you tell me what this means: "interesting fact – since 2012, GWS have spent 24.093m on Membership expense and merchandise costs…for a return of 24.201m – a profit of $107,628. However they also have a merch writeoff of 3.5m on the books in 2013….sooo they havent done spectacularly well here."

A spend of $24.093m for a return of $24.201m doesn't seem to be very good business. And it includes a write off of $3.5m. In your considered opinion what is happening here?? It seems a little fishy sooks.

Terry wrote: Tue Apr 22, 2025 7:03 pm

Terry wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:04 am

WookieReturns wrote: Sat Apr 19, 2025 5:37 pm

this might go well here

That's very interesting sooks. But can you tell me what this means: "interesting fact – since 2012, GWS have spent 24.093m on Membership expense and merchandise costs…for a return of 24.201m – a profit of $107,628. However they also have a merch writeoff of 3.5m on the books in 2013….sooo they havent done spectacularly well here."

A spend of $24.093m for a return of $24.201m doesn't seem to be very good business. And it includes a write off of $3.5m. In your considered opinion what is happening here?? It seems a little fishy sooks.

Ok, so Sooksie hasn't responded to my very reasonable request for him to give his considered "expert" opinion on the Ginats membership and merchandise spend that he recently posted.

Its seems rather odd that this mob has spent......yes spent....... $24M since 2012 on membership and merchandise. I mean how do you spend that amount of money on memberships and merchandise? Aren't those things supposed to be revenue raisers.

Sooksie, if you're engaged pal could you please explain this. You posted this with a cryptic comment. Please explain.

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:54 pm

Terry wrote: Tue Apr 22, 2025 7:03 pm

Terry wrote: Mon Apr 21, 2025 10:04 am

That's very interesting sooks. But can you tell me what this means: "interesting fact – since 2012, GWS have spent 24.093m on Membership expense and merchandise costs…for a return of 24.201m – a profit of $107,628. However they also have a merch writeoff of 3.5m on the books in 2013….sooo they havent done spectacularly well here."

A spend of $24.093m for a return of $24.201m doesn't seem to be very good business. And it includes a write off of $3.5m. In your considered opinion what is happening here?? It seems a little fishy sooks.

Ok, so Sooksie hasn't responded to my very reasonable request for him to give his considered "expert" opinion on the Ginats membership and merchandise spend that he recently posted.

Its seems rather odd that this mob has spent......yes spent....... $24M since 2012 on membership and merchandise. I mean how do you spend that amount of money on memberships and merchandise? Aren't those things supposed to be revenue raisers.

Sooksie, if you're engaged pal could you please explain this. You posted this with a cryptic comment. Please explain.

expense, operations and maybe promotons of membership departments all clubs and sporting organisations will have those

Terry wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:08 am

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:54 pm

Terry wrote: Tue Apr 22, 2025 7:03 pm

Ok, so Sooksie hasn't responded to my very reasonable request for him to give his considered "expert" opinion on the Ginats membership and merchandise spend that he recently posted.

Its seems rather odd that this mob has spent......yes spent....... $24M since 2012 on membership and merchandise. I mean how do you spend that amount of money on memberships and merchandise? Aren't those things supposed to be revenue raisers.

Sooksie, if you're engaged pal could you please explain this. You posted this with a cryptic comment. Please explain.

expense, operations and maybe promotons of membership departments all clubs and sporting organisations will have those

Wackjob 'ol mate 'ol cobber, if all clubs and sporting organisations (or for that matter any business) spent $24M over 13 years for a return $100k. including a $3.5M write off, they would be dead, buried and cremated pal.

But do wack on wackjob. And by the way, THE BIG BLACK BEARS ARE BACK ON THE PROWL AGAIN WACKY!!!!!!!!!!!!

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:13 pm

Punters, can we please treat other posters with a little respect.
childish sometimes.

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:13 pm

Punters, can we please treat other posters with a little respect.
childish sometimes.

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:15 pm

Terry wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:08 am

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:54 pm

expense, operations and maybe promotons of membership departments all clubs and sporting organisations will have those

Wackjob 'ol mate 'ol cobber, if all clubs and sporting organisations (or for that matter any business) spent $24M over 13 years for a return $100k. including a $3.5M write off, they would be dead, buried and cremated pal.

But do wack on wackjob. And by the way, THE BIG BLACK BEARS ARE BACK ON THE PROWL AGAIN WACKY!!!!!!!!!!!!

3.5mill write off i find interesting ontop of the 24mill spent for a 100k return.. (puts into question the 38k members)

CROWDS HAVE NOT RISEN IN 8 YEARS> but members have tripled >>>> GO FIGURE

leeroy*NRL* wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 1:15 pm

Terry wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:08 am

makingnrlfansgowacko wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 11:54 pm

expense, operations and maybe promotons of membership departments all clubs and sporting organisations will have those

Wackjob 'ol mate 'ol cobber, if all clubs and sporting organisations (or for that matter any business) spent $24M over 13 years for a return $100k. including a $3.5M write off, they would be dead, buried and cremated pal.

But do wack on wackjob. And by the way, THE BIG BLACK BEARS ARE BACK ON THE PROWL AGAIN WACKY!!!!!!!!!!!!

3.5mill write off i find interesting ontop of the 24mill spent for a 100k return.. (puts into question the 38k members)

CROWDS HAVE NOT RISEN IN 8 YEARS> but members have tripled >>>> GO FIGURE

Beaussie wrote: Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:20 pm