Talking Footy

No, because they don't have any members.

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Titans wont publish their membership count. I wonder why???

like the Swans eh ?

Nothing to hide at the Swans. Membership numbers there for everyone to see.

http://membership.sydneyswans.com.au/

Now, Titans numbers? Available anywhere?

Gee I can see why they hid them ?

7561....
embarrasing as ...............

Deflecting again I see. Where are those Titans numbers? How about the sponsorless Raiders?

Beaussie wrote:

Deflecting again I see. Where are those Titans numbers? How about the sponsorless Raiders?

Titans had 32% of their 2011 Memberships (8,500) re-signed on Dec 7th
a few days later they've probably added another few hundred .... so they're at about 3000

the Raiders had the same % signed 29... of 10,000 2011 Members ... they'd be at about 3200

both will surpass their 2011 totals despite awful years onfield in 2012
well done to them both

I wonder if the Thuns , Lions & Swans will be able to say the same ?
& GWS at this point in time are an embarrasment of epic proportions ... with just 1849 members



http://www.nrl.com/cowboys-lead-heading ... fault.aspx

The North Queensland Cowboys have taken the lead heading into the final day of the 2012 NRL Club Membership Renewal race.

After the Warriors dominated the first two weeks of the competition, the Townsville based Cowboys have slowly chipped away to have 73% of their members renewed for next year when numbers were provided heading into the weekend.

The Warriors at that stage were at 72%, and the Cowboys most likely challengers unless either the Sea Eagles (58%), Broncos (59%) or Rabbitohs (52%) can get a massive surge before midnight tonight.

It’s not too late to renew your membership! Click here to find out more

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Deflecting again I see. Where are those Titans numbers? How about the sponsorless Raiders?

Titans had 29% of their 2011 Memberships (8,500) re-signed on Dec 7th
a few days later they've probably added another few hundred .... so they're at about 3000

Bullshit

Raiderdave wrote:

the Raiders had the same % signed 29... of 10,000 2011 Members ... they'd be at about 3200

both will surpass their 2011 totals despite awful years onfield in 2012
well done to them both

More rubbish.

Beaussie wrote:

Raiderdave wrote:

Beaussie wrote:

Deflecting again I see. Where are those Titans numbers? How about the sponsorless Raiders?

Titans had 29% of their 2011 Memberships (8,500) re-signed on Dec 7th
a few days later they've probably added another few hundred .... so they're at about 3000

Bullshit

Raiderdave wrote:

the Raiders had the same % signed 29... of 10,000 2011 Members ... they'd be at about 3200

both will surpass their 2011 totals despite awful years onfield in 2012
well done to them both

More rubbish.

No .. the only BS so far this arvo is the assertion the Swans have only had their memberships on sale for a week
its been a month

but hey .... a week is nearly a month eh

There's no point addressing him, Beaussie. He just pulls numbers out of his arse and hopes people will believe him. He has no credibility and should be ignored. At least until he starts providing links to back up his numbers.

Topper wrote:

There's no point addressing him, Beaussie. He just pulls numbers out of his arse and hopes people will believe him. He has no credibility and should be ignored. At least until he starts providing links to back up his numbers.

theres a link provided you wombat ..... try clicking on it

just because you don't like whats in the link... & you do a few of these
doesn't mean it aint true

you like most AFL fans are amongst the best ostrich impersonators on the face of the planet
the slight variation is Ostriches put their heads in the sand

AFL fans put theirs .... up their @rses

Topper wrote:

There's no point addressing him, Beaussie. He just pulls numbers out of his arse and hopes people will believe him. He has no credibility and should be ignored. At least until he starts providing links to back up his numbers.

I hear ya. The silly link he did provided has no numbers just stats. You know that saying about stats...

Beaussie wrote:

Topper wrote:

There's no point addressing him, Beaussie. He just pulls numbers out of his arse and hopes people will believe him. He has no credibility and should be ignored. At least until he starts providing links to back up his numbers.

I hear ya. The silly link he did provided has no numbers just stats. You know that saying about stats...

oh the numbers will be there soon enough

heres a number for you if thats what you're after & a link too
http://www.gwsgiants.com.au/
GWS ..... 2016

2016

Like the crowds, expect fudged membership numbers too from the Gold Coast Titans in particular.

Indeed.

Beaussie wrote:

Like the crowds, expect fudged membership numbers too from the Gold Coast Titans in particular.

yes .... & like the Thuns have 7K members ....
does their front office know if someone signs up , its not their legs you count as members

Topper and Beaussie it seems the pair of you have done what I call the 'ol AFL supporter backflip' or what Raider calls the Ostrich right before our eyes on this page. First the pair of you spout "no proof" "he needs to provide links". Then Raider provides the links and, after performing the AFL backflip/ostrich and wedging your noggins squarely up your rectums, the pair of you let out muffled "remember that saying about stats" and "the numbers are tainted".

Hilarious! The pair of you should keep your heads lodged up your rectums, open your eyes and inhale deeply through the nose. Things arent as warm and cosy as it seems in AFL land are they?

"It's Tubbs you fools Tubbs"