Cracker wrote:You don't have to visit each other in order to know each other, AFLcrap1. It would appear from your stalker accusation that NRLCrap1 confidently and correctly predicted that there is some truth in what he says. How much? Obviously no one can tell and will be able to tell unless NRLCrap1 breaks the rules and shows us this presumably very personal information about both Raiderdave and AFLcrap1.
There must be quite a story in that email, and behind it's receipt as well.
Isnt it strange how you continually believe cwapper but dismiss what I say .
Can you show me one shred of evidence that I know RD.
Can you show me where you think its odd that some posters on here are seeking info (dumb pricks got wrong info) on another poster.
Anyone can claim to have info on another ..
In fact I have an email that states that NRL cwapper did time for molesting a goat.
see that's easy.
& what bothers me is how quickly you jump on the AFL side of things ,even when some fruitloop admits to stalking .
& you cant delete my claim .
You allow his claim on an email .
Then you allow mine.
& if you would like some facts I will tell you .
A. I don't know RD except from here & LU.
Never met ,talked or messaged.
The email im 100% sure come from a poster called James Stewert.
A bigger fruitloop than some posters on here .
He was on a FB site AFL V RL & staked plenty of RL fans .
He got booted from LU for posting personal pics & info.
He knew my name from FB,thats how the other stalkers know my name .
That's all they have right.
But it makes Cwapper feel important.
Most people couldn't give a shit about another posters name .
Only those who are losing arguments & have nothing.
SO as long as the poster who likes automated responses makes false claims about me ..I shall do the same ..
This will be a test for your Biased moderating..
Up till now its fine to make personal claims against me or Rd ..
How will it go when the goat molester gets some back?