including making up the attendancesPhelpsy wrote:suns manage metricon you see so suns make the rules.

including making up the attendancesPhelpsy wrote:suns manage metricon you see so suns make the rules.
the suns must the same management group that the does the titans & other NRL gamesRaiderdave wrote:including making up the attendancesPhelpsy wrote:suns manage metricon you see so suns make the rules.
Cracker wrote:I think you will find the prohibition of the soft drink bottles are to prevent them being used as weapons, Phelpsy. Alarmist I know but I believe that to be the reason.
Now then, perhaps if NRLCrap1 can not decipher the above binary code you will all accept that he is not a spambot?214Four wrote:Nar its more likie..AFLcrap1 wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:We need a fucking moderator to throw this bullshit in the bin! Piss off, Dave!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
110001101000110001100111001001111110101010110111001011001101010011100001101000101100101010111001011010101101010110101011010101101010 :P
Thats craperbot language :D
Proof please.Raiderdave wrote:including making up the attendancesPhelpsy wrote:suns manage metricon you see so suns make the rules.
Well there is only room for one braindead lying ,backward ****.Cracker wrote:Proof please.Raiderdave wrote:including making up the attendancesPhelpsy wrote:suns manage metricon you see so suns make the rules.
Phelpsy, with all due respect I don't think the spambot rhetoric is just a deflection. I think they are serious and want NRLCrap1 thrown out legitimately. I am still waiting for proof of this claim.
so you are going to loose that titleAFLcrap1 wrote:Well there is only room for one braindead lying ,backward ****.Cracker wrote:Proof please.Raiderdave wrote:including making up the attendancesPhelpsy wrote:suns manage metricon you see so suns make the rules.
Phelpsy, with all due respect I don't think the spambot rhetoric is just a deflection. I think they are serious and want NRLCrap1 thrown out legitimately. I am still waiting for proof of this claim.
& it looks like you have taken that title off Cwapper ,so he goes.
I doubt the capability to make such a judgment is within your abilities, AFLcrap1.AFLcrap1 wrote:Well there is only room for one braindead lying ,backward ****.Cracker wrote:Proof please.Raiderdave wrote:including making up the attendancesPhelpsy wrote:suns manage metricon you see so suns make the rules.
Phelpsy, with all due respect I don't think the spambot rhetoric is just a deflection. I think they are serious and want NRLCrap1 thrown out legitimately. I am still waiting for proof of this claim.
& it looks like you have taken that title off Cwapper ,so he goes.
yes indeed ParraParraEelsNRL wrote:Isn't that 2 crowds in a row now the Titans have clearly smacked the other mob?
Raiderdave wrote:yes indeed ParraParraEelsNRL wrote:Isn't that 2 crowds in a row now the Titans have clearly smacked the other mob?
Titans V Broncos 20,524
Thuns V Kitty Kats ... announced as 16,500 .. actual crowd about 11,000
Titans V Souths 19,107
Thuns V Midgets ... announced as 11,500... actual crowd about 4,000
it isn't a contest folks
ParraEelsNRL wrote:Isn't that 2 crowds in a row now the Titans have clearly smacked the other mob?