Who should go and who should stay

[Cracker]

Spambots are limited to website providers, so what I will do if I should become moderator (if I have access to certain information that is) is check NRLCrap1's provider. It won't guarantee it of course, because I do not believe he is behaving like a bot.

[214Four]

do you keep your election promises?? have you budgeted for it?

[Cracker]

I do keep my election promises. My budgeting is in order. Thank you for asking me the difficult questions.

[AFLcrap1]

I do keep my election promises. My budgeting is in order. Thank you for asking me the difficult questions.

Did you get hit in the head a lot when you were a kid.?
Fall off your bike a lot(No Helmut obviously)?

[NRLCrap1]

Of course I'm not a spambot! Here's the definition of a spambot;

"A spambot is an automated computer program designed to assist in the sending of spam."

Now someone tell me about spam and how what I type is spam? What am I advertising or promoting for payment?

[Cracker]

I do keep my election promises. My budgeting is in order. Thank you for asking me the difficult questions.

Did you get hit in the head a lot when you were a kid.?
Fall off your bike a lot(No Helmut obviously)?

No. I said difficult questions and that was easy.

[King-Eliagh]

Of course I'm not a spambot! Here's the definition of a spambot;

"A spambot is an automated computer program designed to assist in the sending of spam."

Now someone tell me about spam and how what I type is spam? What am I advertising or promoting for payment?

Can someone deactivate this annoying spambot? Beaussie?

[Cracker]

Please prove that he is a spambot.

[King-Eliagh]

It's obvious. If it's not then I think it should have to prove it's not.

Hey spambot? Tell us the meaning of love and what love means to you?

[Cracker]

It's not obvious. Please explain your reasoning.

[King-Eliagh]

Comon spambot, answer the questions if ur not a spambot!

[NRLCrap1]

Asking Eliagh to explain his reasoning is like asking Gillard to explain the fricking Carbon Tax!!

[King-Eliagh]

It's obvious as all fukk cwacker. We all know it but ok, just for the dummies I'll explain. I refer to spambots post above and failure to reply to my questions about love.

You see cwacker, spambots don't feel human emotions such as love, hence our spambots inability to express what love means to it or even answer my question. Additionally spambots are often developed to recognise a set of words and then phrase together a fairly benign sentence, or even two sentences if the programmer has decided so. Example provided below.

please explain your reasoning

asking Eliagh to 'explain his reasoning is like' ... ...

And it's like this every time with spambot. Hence his new name

So spambot, define love and tell us what it feels like.

[Cracker]

The definition you have given is not a spambot, King Eliagh. You have failed to provide a valid explanation as invited. A true spambot is not able to feel any emotion at all, let alone "love". It can not hate and it certainly can not abuse or mock. NRLCrap1 has shown hate and mocked, and occasionally abused also.

[AFLcrap1]

Of course I'm not a spambot! Here's the definition of a spambot;

"A spambot is an automated computer program designed to assist in the sending of spam."

Now someone tell me about spam and how what I type is spam? What am I advertising or promoting for payment?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AFLcrap1, Bing [Bot], pussycat , Spambot[NRLCrap1] and 0 guests

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>