So Wookie has said that SOO is NOT an Exhibition game.Xman wrote:Which is eactly my point. NRL fans claim SOO is NRL. If it is then why doesnt it affect the NRL competition? By definition it must be an NRL exhibition game then, since this is what exhibition games areThe_Wookie wrote:Origin is not an exhibition game. Exhibition games are like soccer friendlies, pointless and with nothing hanging on the result. Origin is linked to state and national selection, and is part of the representative calendar.AFLcrap1 wrote:Say whatever you like.
That is not proof.
Now off you go & show some proof that SOO is an exhibition game.
Whether its part of the NRL is another question. Origin was previously run by the ARL, now the ARLC and is budgeted separately according to the annual report for the NRL. However the TV rights sold to the ARLC are all inclusive and are not sold to the NRL, and thus origin cant be excluded from tv rights or ratings discussion.
Yet you are still trying to spin it as true.
YOu lied ,You failed to post any proof.
& now you fail to admit it.
I would expect lies are now allowed .
Or is that just a rule for you.