Stop deflecting .Xman wrote:How does it impact the NRL season?AFLcrap1 wrote:Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.
liar extraordinaire 
You have to excuse him, hes got a very saw butt at the moment :_<>AFLcrap1 wrote:Xman .
You lied.
Show me proof that the yearlySOO games are exhibition games .
.
Proof please.
If its part of the NRL then it isAFLcrap1 wrote:Stop deflecting .Xman wrote:How does it impact the NRL season?AFLcrap1 wrote:Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.
You claimed SOO is an exhibition game .
Provide proof please.
And against another game rating over 100k on foxtel :>::pussycat wrote:Im very impressed - youve beat a 1 hour delayed game by 100k =D> =D> =D>
Prove what you claimed..Xman wrote:If its part of the NRL then it isAFLcrap1 wrote:Stop deflecting .Xman wrote:How does it impact the NRL season?AFLcrap1 wrote:Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.
You claimed SOO is an exhibition game .
Provide proof please.
liar extraordinaire As I have said, the definition of an exhibition game is one that has no baring on the actual competition. So, if you claim its an NRL game then by definition its an exhibitionAFLcrap1 wrote:Prove what you claimed..Xman wrote:If its part of the NRL then it isAFLcrap1 wrote:Stop deflecting .Xman wrote:How does it impact the NRL season?AFLcrap1 wrote:Its part of the NRL REP season .
So yes you lied.
Unless you can provide proof that they are Exhibition games.
You claimed SOO is an exhibition game .
Provide proof please.
Its a simple rule all posters have to abide by.
You made a claim & have so far not shown one bit of evidence to back it up .
Makes you a liar.
liar extraordinaire Which is eactly my point. NRL fans claim SOO is NRL. If it is then why doesnt it affect the NRL competition? By definition it must be an NRL exhibition game then, since this is what exhibition games areThe_Wookie wrote:Origin is not an exhibition game. Exhibition games are like soccer friendlies, pointless and with nothing hanging on the result. Origin is linked to state and national selection, and is part of the representative calendar.AFLcrap1 wrote:Say whatever you like.
That is not proof.
Now off you go & show some proof that SOO is an exhibition game.
Whether its part of the NRL is another question. Origin was previously run by the ARL, now the ARLC and is budgeted separately according to the annual report for the NRL. However the TV rights sold to the ARLC are all inclusive and are not sold to the NRL, and thus origin cant be excluded from tv rights or ratings discussion.
Xman wrote:And against another game rating over 100k on foxtel :>::pussycat wrote:Im very impressed - youve beat a 1 hour delayed game by 100k =D> =D> =D>
I've noticedPhelpsy wrote:AFL still kicks nrl butt in the ratings ... No matter how you try and spin it or manipulate it
I highly doubt it. They make every effort to ensure their telecasts are isolatedpussycat wrote:Xman wrote:And against another game rating over 100k on foxtel :>::pussycat wrote:Im very impressed - youve beat a 1 hour delayed game by 100k =D> =D> =D>
Another But But excuse. If you look at the NRL guide you will see that the1 hour delayed game is overlapped by the Fox game that rated almost 200k. but but but.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 4 guests