There is a difference between a direct claim (which you are denying) and an insinuation (which I am claiming you did).AFLcrap1 wrote:Are you really that dumb..
I was talking about Adumb,Swines & co on here starting threads & laughing at a fringe RL player working a 2nd job.
& your highlighted part does not state anything like what you claim.
I repeat..SHOW me where I claimed that AFL players will have NOTHING when they retire..
Once we establish that difference the situation will be clear as glass. You insinuated through the underlined comment that the NRL situation being laughed at is better than the AFL's full time no need for a second job arrangement. That is what you were called on - putting the NRL situation ahead of the AFL's. Which means you insinuated in effect that AFL players will have nothing when they retire. That's why my first comment in reply was "The NRL should follow the AFL's lead" (quoted verbatim).
Do I have to show you a flow chart to demonstrate this? Are you truly that unintelligent?