Rugby League just can't get development right!

[Cracker]

Contract.

There it is. You just demonstrated the correctness in what I stated. All AFL players are contracted. No exceptions.

[cos789]

Are oy for real. Signing contract has nothing to do with restraint of trade.

[Cracker]

Signing a contract prevents a player from playing anywhere he wants. This contradicts your earlier claim. That is the argument here.

[cos789]

Just how old are you?
Most people sign are free to sign lots of contracts in their lifetime.
Once you sign then you are obviously bound by the contract.
What's this got to do with restraint of trade??

[Cracker]

You claimed that any AFL player can play anywhere no matter what. That insinuated all - including those under contract.

[cos789]

I said an AFL player is not subjected to restraint of trade. grow up.

[AFLcrap1]

Fruitloop Cos & liar Cwackhead.

[Cracker]

I said an AFL player is not subjected to restraint of trade. grow up.

No you said what I stated you said. It doesn't work trying to change the field.

Xman, I ask that AFLcrap1 be warned for that.

[Xman]

I said an AFL player is not subjected to restraint of trade. grow up.

No you said what I stated you said. It doesn't work trying to change the field.

Xman, I ask that AFLcrap1 be warned for that.

It was immature and borderline but not vulgar or abusive

[cos789]

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding
that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade. Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

[Cracker]

Then show me how Buddy Franklin can play for anyone other than Sydney while under contract.

[ParraEelsNRL]

Who and who?

[cos789]

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding
that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade. Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

**********************************this crackpot**************************************************

[Cracker]

You ignored my question in reply that blows this argument to smithereens.

[cos789]

If you want to talk about the draft and restraint of trade then you have to have at least the minimum understanding that a contract is NOT itself restraint of trade.
Hopefully you are old enough to grasp this fact crackpot.

**********************************this crackpot**************************************************

**********************************this crackpot*************************************************

Apparantly you are not.