So says the man who is clearly on medication! Low life!Raiderdave wrote:Swans4ever wrote:No that's NOT how it happened - to use your tactic post the actual thread or be called a liar!AFLcrap1 wrote:I will explain it for the very slow..thats you .Swans4ever wrote:For someone that wasn't around then you speak as thou you know the context - now if you want to know how that came about I will tell you (or you could look it up) but those that were there do - I will excuse your ignorance now bit next time I will demand an apology!AFLcrap1 wrote:Not really .Swans4ever wrote:Me thinks I heard a loud crack! I think he's lost it!Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:
I notice someone has voted for "anything goes". HE cannot complain.
yeah that was me
so... go fuck your cat .. you dog !!
Hasn't pulled out the Internet hero Line.
Get in the ring ,i'll fight ya .
Come on get in the ring".
That's when someone has really lost it.
Before I joined in late OCT ...I used to read the fight club threads on here ..
Wow ...really ,you mean someone can get on a PC & read what other people post..
& they don't have to be signed up as a member ..
DOUBLE WOW...
So yes I was reading RD baiting you ,& you throwing the toys out of the cot & turning into Internet tough guy..
Was very very amusing...
RD was posting how he could smash any AF player, I said he wouldn't say to the likes of Barry Hall - He said he wouldn't be scared of him - I said that he was brave over a computer and was a coward and any day he wants to step in a ring to let me know (there was no demand to fight at this time). KE then posted that he would - I wasn't actually posting to RD to step in a ring prior to that. So again unless you can post otherwise you ARE A LYING SACK OF SHIT!!!!
Just like most people who follow RL!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
me thinks I heard a loud crack ?![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
what a fuckin ta.rd![]()
![]()
![]()
Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Got any proof?Swans4ever wrote:So says the man who is clearly on medication! Low life!Raiderdave wrote:Swans4ever wrote:No that's NOT how it happened - to use your tactic post the actual thread or be called a liar!AFLcrap1 wrote:I will explain it for the very slow..thats you .Swans4ever wrote:For someone that wasn't around then you speak as thou you know the context - now if you want to know how that came about I will tell you (or you could look it up) but those that were there do - I will excuse your ignorance now bit next time I will demand an apology!AFLcrap1 wrote:Not really .Swans4ever wrote:Me thinks I heard a loud crack! I think he's lost it!Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:
I notice someone has voted for "anything goes". HE cannot complain.
yeah that was me
so... go fuck your cat .. you dog !!
Hasn't pulled out the Internet hero Line.
Get in the ring ,i'll fight ya .
Come on get in the ring".
That's when someone has really lost it.
Before I joined in late OCT ...I used to read the fight club threads on here ..
Wow ...really ,you mean someone can get on a PC & read what other people post..
& they don't have to be signed up as a member ..
DOUBLE WOW...
So yes I was reading RD baiting you ,& you throwing the toys out of the cot & turning into Internet tough guy..
Was very very amusing...
RD was posting how he could smash any AF player, I said he wouldn't say to the likes of Barry Hall - He said he wouldn't be scared of him - I said that he was brave over a computer and was a coward and any day he wants to step in a ring to let me know (there was no demand to fight at this time). KE then posted that he would - I wasn't actually posting to RD to step in a ring prior to that. So again unless you can post otherwise you ARE A LYING SACK OF SHIT!!!!
Just like most people who follow RL!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
me thinks I heard a loud crack ?![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
what a fuckin ta.rd![]()
![]()
![]()
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Yeah all his posts ANYONE that continually abuses other posters - makes up facts - posts pictures of babies - makes generalised statements about a sport being a breading ground for peadophiles and cannot admit when wrong or concede when mistaken fits all the categories and symptoms of a narcissistic personality with anti social traits - possibly with a paranoid condition as well - in fact sounds very similar to you as well - hating a sport is clearly a reflection of an immature personality which you definitely are. So plenty of proof there!AFLcrap1 wrote:Got any proof?Swans4ever wrote:So says the man who is clearly on medication! Low life!Raiderdave wrote:Swans4ever wrote:No that's NOT how it happened - to use your tactic post the actual thread or be called a liar!AFLcrap1 wrote:I will explain it for the very slow..thats you .Swans4ever wrote:For someone that wasn't around then you speak as thou you know the context - now if you want to know how that came about I will tell you (or you could look it up) but those that were there do - I will excuse your ignorance now bit next time I will demand an apology!AFLcrap1 wrote:Not really .Swans4ever wrote:Me thinks I heard a loud crack! I think he's lost it!Raiderdave wrote:cos789 wrote:
I notice someone has voted for "anything goes". HE cannot complain.
yeah that was me
so... go fuck your cat .. you dog !!
Hasn't pulled out the Internet hero Line.
Get in the ring ,i'll fight ya .
Come on get in the ring".
That's when someone has really lost it.
Before I joined in late OCT ...I used to read the fight club threads on here ..
Wow ...really ,you mean someone can get on a PC & read what other people post..
& they don't have to be signed up as a member ..
DOUBLE WOW...
So yes I was reading RD baiting you ,& you throwing the toys out of the cot & turning into Internet tough guy..
Was very very amusing...
RD was posting how he could smash any AF player, I said he wouldn't say to the likes of Barry Hall - He said he wouldn't be scared of him - I said that he was brave over a computer and was a coward and any day he wants to step in a ring to let me know (there was no demand to fight at this time). KE then posted that he would - I wasn't actually posting to RD to step in a ring prior to that. So again unless you can post otherwise you ARE A LYING SACK OF SHIT!!!!
Just like most people who follow RL!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
me thinks I heard a loud crack ?![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
what a fuckin ta.rd![]()
![]()
![]()
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Having seen what has happened in this thread thus far, perhaps a little bit of abuse is okay and that is how I voted. But as has been stated there are lines that should not be crossed.
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
can this thread just be closed, all that is happening the bumsniffers & AFL fans keep throwing the shit back and forward. its getting to the point its not worth posting anything of decent discussion because the threads just get hijacked by resident idiots, raiderdave and AFL crap1, always attempting to take the moral high grounds, just when proven wrong, threads are filled with random made up rubbish, or people being called liar's
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Ok, it looks perfectly clear from the responses so far that abusive posts are not acceptable to the vast majority of members. So, what we need now is a clear description of what is and isnt acceptable going forward. This way everyone will be on the same page and will understand how to behave to avoid incurring penalty.
So, I want everyone to post what they believe are examples of unacceptable behaviour that will no longer be acceptable on this page of the forum. Some of these will of course overlap or be included in the current posting rules. I'll start.
1. Personal insults which include offensive or vulgar language or descriptions. Examples: shitface, cumstain, ****, rapist etc....
Your turn to outline some rules for reasonable behaviour......
So, I want everyone to post what they believe are examples of unacceptable behaviour that will no longer be acceptable on this page of the forum. Some of these will of course overlap or be included in the current posting rules. I'll start.
1. Personal insults which include offensive or vulgar language or descriptions. Examples: shitface, cumstain, ****, rapist etc....
Your turn to outline some rules for reasonable behaviour......
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Heres a hint.adamj1300 wrote:can this thread just be closed, all that is happening the bumsniffers & AFL fans keep throwing the shit back and forward. its getting to the point its not worth posting anything of decent discussion because the threads just get hijacked by resident idiots, raiderdave and AFL crap1, always attempting to take the moral high grounds, just when proven wrong, threads are filled with random made up rubbish, or people being called liar's
If you don't want to be called a liar,Then don't post LIES.
Simple ..
Go Back & revise your post/lie about Suns having higher crowds than the Titans.
You were proven wrong & still wont admit it..
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
No he wasn't. I proved that you were out of line by showing the total crowd average. I never called you a liar incidentally. I was simply showing show Adamj1300 was not lying. And you choose to ignore this for convenience only and for no other reason.
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Ok, I'm going to be interstate on the weekend so I won't have time to police any newly introduced rules. However, when I get back on Sunday evening these new rules will take affect.Xman wrote:Ok, it looks perfectly clear from the responses so far that abusive posts are not acceptable to the vast majority of members. So, what we need now is a clear description of what is and isnt acceptable going forward. This way everyone will be on the same page and will understand how to behave to avoid incurring penalty.
So, I want everyone to post what they believe are examples of unacceptable behaviour that will no longer be acceptable on this page of the forum. Some of these will of course overlap or be included in the current posting rules. I'll start.
1. Personal insults which include offensive or vulgar language or descriptions. Examples: shitface, cumstain, ****, rapist etc....
Your turn to outline some rules for reasonable behaviour......
If you want any additional rules introduced beyond what is mentioned above please propose them before Sunday night.
Now, these are the penalties I propose:
- minor abusive posts with vulgar language - a warning and post deleted. A second warning within 7 days will result in loss of posting privileges for 24hrs. Repeat offenders risk longer suspensions.
- major abuse with vulgar language - loss of posting privileges for 24hrs and deletion of post. A repeat offence within 7 days will result in a loss of posting privileges for 7 days. Repeat offenders will receive longer suspensions.
If there are objections to these proposals you have until Sunday night to have your say before they are introduced.
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Look you fucking idiot.Cracker wrote:No he wasn't. I proved that you were out of line by showing the total crowd average. I never called you a liar incidentally. I was simply showing show Adamj1300 was not lying. And you choose to ignore this for convenience only and for no other reason.
HE WAS NOT talking total crowd average,
He was talking Crowds V crowds on the GC.
Simply put ..
The popularity of a team in a certain area ,has NOTHING whatsoever to do with fans from other regions..
A Titans fan in Canberra has nothing to do with their popularity on the GC.
How fucking hard is that to understand.
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Being the FC ,I have no problems with language,or abuse.
Posting personal details...a NO NO .
Posting personal details...a NO NO .
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Your opinion is noted. However the majority appear to have spoken. I'm sure we can do this without getting unnecessarily personalAFLcrap1 wrote:Being the FC ,I have no problems with language,or abuse.
Posting personal details...a NO NO .
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
-
- Seniors
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:51 pm
- Team: Wests Tigers - Balmain - Western Sydney Wanderers
- Location: Westsern Sydney
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
HMM....adamj1300 wrote:can this thread just be closed, all that is happening the bumsniffers & AFL fans keep throwing the shit back and forward. its getting to the point its not worth posting anything of decent discussion because the threads just get hijacked by resident idiots, raiderdave and AFL crap1, always attempting to take the moral high grounds, just when proven wrong, threads are filled with random made up rubbish, or people being called liar's


"Wearing tight shorts is a bootable offense!"
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>214Four wrote:HMM....adamj1300 wrote:can this thread just be closed, all that is happening the bumsniffers & AFL fans keep throwing the shit back and forward. its getting to the point its not worth posting anything of decent discussion because the threads just get hijacked by resident idiots, raiderdave and AFL crap1, always attempting to take the moral high grounds, just when proven wrong, threads are filled with random made up rubbish, or people being called liar's














you pegged that Lyin ***** to a tee






RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- cos789
- Coach
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:43 pm
- Team: Wookie is a failed pathetic ugly woman
- Location:
Re: Poll: Are personally abusive posts acceptable in TFC?
Because you'd have to responsible . What a blouse.AFLcrap1 wrote:Being the FC ,I have no problems with language,or abuse.
Posting personal details...a NO NO .
Nice try Cos.