The Reality of Fumble Athletes.

[King-Eliagh]

That's bullshit. Forwards in the NRL need speed also and I'm telling you it'd be prob the nrl that would win if you pitched nrl forwards vs AFL ruckmen over 100metres I think hindmarsh ran the 100 in not much over 11 seconds when he was 23 I know more about marngrook than you know about league here Xman so I think I gotcha pal :D

[Swans4ever]

True aflcrap. This is also supported by the apparent ease with which players of other codes can make the top level of the code. Taigh Kennelly played gaelic footy for peanuts then came to the swans and became one of the clubs marquee players in no time, helping them win the 05 GF. Pyke is a former pro RU player, he is now also one of the swans marquee players and gave most of the AFL a marking lesson last year. Khunts wobbling round playing each week up their on the GC, folou, like khunt impressed so many AFL experts.

Then there's me. I found the transition fairly easy too, albeit at a much lower level than AFL and NRL. But I was quickly up to standard and able to make opposing players, who'd played all their life, look pretty silly. It's gods honest truth im telling here guys. I known it sounds bad but I can only tell it how it is. It just doesn't happen the other way round neither. The evidence is so so so ... .... .... .... so so so . ... so so stacked against marngrook on this one... Sorry.

Hahahahaha.......KE ur killing me stop please stop, haven't laughed so much for ages! So what did you do after exploring deepest darkest Africa and going to the deepest depths of the ocean after bring the first Australian in space? Mate get a grip unless you can tell us who you are how could we EVER verify your so called dominance, what a joker!

When I played against Paris in the Netherlands I was up against this bloke from perth. Chased him down and smashed him a few times. I think he probably thought, he's speedy and where'd he learn to hit so hard. I woulda answered, RL my friend, RL. :D

Lemme remind you we're on a website here swines. People like yourself have stuipidly suggested I tell them who I am to "prove it". I could give you the name of USYD's best first div player and pretend that's me. But I wouldn't bother lying on here, there's no point. You can take it or leave it chump, I don't give two shits either way really. Look I know im a touch brash but the fact is I made the transition very easily and very quickly got to a standard where other players were amazed id only been playing a short period of time. I put it down to RL and RU, as well as my bball skills. I think if I had of started in marngrook and tried the other way round I would've failed abysmally.

Well I don't know which division you played in or the standard but my experience in the then SFL was that there were some RL types that came across and did well in the first and second quarters it was in the third and fourth quarters where they struggled. I'm not asking that you reveal yourself but generalising that anyone can play at AFL level from NRL is really a simplistic view, Kennelly trained hard for years doing more work than other players as did Pike and Hunt - Issy didn't want to do the work and that's why he failed. If an AFL player was chosen to play NRL he would have to work otherwise he would fail too. RL and RU strength is their strength not their fitness or aerobic fitness.

[Xman]

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

Why does the number of breaks make a difference. There are large periods in RL where almost every player ambles along. That beats interchanges by miles.

& there are plenty of players 100 mtrs from the action in derpball,rubbing man boobies with an opposition player or pinching each other .

there was an article (will find it ) where Nathan friend was scientifically monitered in a game & the force he experienced in tackling was the same Gs as a jet fighter pilot..
& he does this 40-50 times a game .
Tell me how being a long distance runner without the impacts/collisions of rl players makes fumbler better.

Not in modern AR's. The entire team zones meaning they are part of a formation that follows the ball all over the ground. Running distances are far higher in AR's,

I have no doubt that RL is physically demanding. However your claim the AFL is easy because of 150 interchanges is just ignorant. They break because the game pretty much never stops. Even when the ball is stationary players are still traying to gain a positional advantage, and their opponent following.

''Physically, AFL is a two-hour running game where two things happen,'' says Gibbs. ''Firstly, the total distance you run is further than in an NRL game. Secondly, you run at a higher intensity. AFL is a man-on-man game. You have to go with your opponent.''In rugby league, there are lots of times you can have a rest. You can sit in the defensive line where the ball isn't. You can hide on the blind. Folau will have to lose weight to run better. He doesn't need all his size.'' Similarly, Inglis would have to sacrifice weight for running capacity. The Storm is encouraging Inglis to run two kilometres a game. In AFL, he must run 14

http://m.smh.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/vast-g ... -z9oy.html

[Cracker]

Well lets not get all technical here, otherwise you'll contradict yourself again by starting to compare apples with oranges. RL forwards are not always built for speed. Though I reckon in his early 20s Nathan hindmarsh would of outsprinted most AFL players.

No lets keep this to the point. One code produces the fastest athletes. That code is RL.

It also produces the slowest, King Eliagh. That's why I stated that it is not possible to label one code as faster than the other, and you are in fact comparing apples with oranges in stating in any way otherwise. Individual examples like Hindmarsh detract from the point.

[Raiderdave]

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

I wonder how RL if they had to play for 120 min!

what fumbler plays for 120 minutes dickhead :_<> :_<> :_<>

they get interchanged 180 times a game
half the game they're sitting on the bench or on the ground in front of it getting their skinny little chicken legs rubbed down

softest game there is

soccer is tougher

[Raiderdave]

What I love about the AFL is that there is a role for almost every body size. Sandinlands is 7 foot and can dominate. Boomer Harvey is around 5'7" and can win games on his own. Lean players like Dustin Fletcher can be the best in their class, while heavy set players like Lockett can be unstoppable.

What a great game!

yes .... only the VFL has this

oh by the way
Sam Kasiano & Chris Sandow say hi


seriously
are there a bigger pack of dribblers around then fumblers :_<> :_<> :_<>

who?

Like I said, I compared the storm and Geelong. One major difference was the variability in player shapes and sizes in the AFL, where as NRL players were far more likely to conform to a similar body shape and size.

again
you're ignorance is astounding

you & most fumblers think the VFL is the only sport that has variance in size
but as we all know ...........fumblers are dribblers
end of


http://www.zerotackle.com/nrl/rugby-lea ... -shortest/
half you seen RL half backs & some fullbacks

I never said RL didnt have diversity numb nuts.

sure dickhead

sure

Quoting only parts of my comments doesn't change what I said, it merely makes you look stupid.

my link made you look like a dribbler

but but
I didn't say that ... truly wuely I didn't
:_<> :_<> :_<>

you we're made look like a moron
as you often are on these forums :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Your link shows the tallest NRL players are 6'6", with 5'6" the shortest

Almost every AFL club would have at least 3 players well over 6'6", some being 6'8" up to 7'. Yet the smallest players in the AFL would be around the same height as smaller players in RL.

so
they're almost exactly the same difference from tallest to shortest
thanks for that

you insinuated only your fumbling crap game has variance in the size of its players
I proved you're a dribbler :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

[Cracker]

Your assumption that the insinuation you claim was there is off base, Raiderdave. I suggest you look at the comment you are referring to again and explain it to us if you disagree.

[Raiderdave]

. I suggest you look at the comment you are referring to again and explain it to us if you disagree.

I did

I do ...

K dickhead

[Swans4ever]

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

I wonder how RL if they had to play for 120 min!

what fumbler plays for 120 minutes dickhead :_<> :_<> :_<>

they get interchanged 180 times a game
half the game they're sitting on the bench or on the ground in front of it getting their skinny little chicken legs rubbed down

softest game there is

soccer is tougher

And what RL player plays for 80 min - 49 min games just over half!

[Raiderdave]

& i wonder how Fumblers would go if they only had 10 interchanges per side per game ...
150 ..bhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
.they rack up the KMs running to & from the Interchange bench.

I wonder how RL if they had to play for 120 min!

what fumbler plays for 120 minutes dickhead :_<> :_<> :_<>

they get interchanged 180 times a game
half the game they're sitting on the bench or on the ground in front of it getting their skinny little chicken legs rubbed down

softest game there is

soccer is tougher

And what RL player plays for 80 min - 49 min games just over half!

plenty never see an interchange you fuckstick :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
its really only the bigger forwards that do

halves
backs
& the dummy half only come off if they are injured

seriously
you & wrong

peas & carrots as Forrest gump would say :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

[NRLCrap1]

. I suggest you look at the comment you are referring to again and explain it to us if you disagree.

I did

I do ...

K dickhead

The sultan of the irresponsible strikes again! Run Dave Run!

[Xman]

What I love about the AFL is that there is a role for almost every body size. Sandinlands is 7 foot and can dominate. Boomer Harvey is around 5'7" and can win games on his own. Lean players like Dustin Fletcher can be the best in their class, while heavy set players like Lockett can be unstoppable.

What a great game!

yes .... only the VFL has this

oh by the way
Sam Kasiano & Chris Sandow say hi


seriously
are there a bigger pack of dribblers around then fumblers :_<> :_<> :_<>

who?

Like I said, I compared the storm and Geelong. One major difference was the variability in player shapes and sizes in the AFL, where as NRL players were far more likely to conform to a similar body shape and size.

again
you're ignorance is astounding

you & most fumblers think the VFL is the only sport that has variance in size
but as we all know ...........fumblers are dribblers
end of


http://www.zerotackle.com/nrl/rugby-lea ... -shortest/
half you seen RL half backs & some fullbacks

I never said RL didnt have diversity numb nuts.

sure dickhead

sure

Quoting only parts of my comments doesn't change what I said, it merely makes you look stupid.

my link made you look like a dribbler

but but
I didn't say that ... truly wuely I didn't
:_<> :_<> :_<>

you we're made look like a moron
as you often are on these forums :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Your link shows the tallest NRL players are 6'6", with 5'6" the shortest

Almost every AFL club would have at least 3 players well over 6'6", some being 6'8" up to 7'. Yet the smallest players in the AFL would be around the same height as smaller players in RL.

so
they're almost exactly the same difference from tallest to shortest
thanks for that

you insinuated only your fumbling crap game has variance in the size of its players
I proved you're a dribbler :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I claimed AFL has a broader range of body shapes and sizes. Your link proved it.

I claimed ARs was a great game because it was well suited to all body shapes and sizes, and never mentioned the NRL.

So your comments again are completely incorrect

[Raiderdave]

[quote="Xman"]

What I love about the AFL is that there is a role for almost every body size. Sandinlands is 7 foot and can dominate. Boomer Harvey is around 5'7" and can win games on his own. Lean players like Dustin Fletcher can be the best in their class, while heavy set players like Lockett can be unstoppable.

What a great game!

yes .... only the VFL has this

oh by the way
Sam Kasiano & Chris Sandow say hi


seriously
are there a bigger pack of dribblers around then fumblers :_<> :_<> :_<>

who?

Like I said, I compared the storm and Geelong. One major difference was the variability in player shapes and sizes in the AFL, where as NRL players were far more likely to conform to a similar body shape and size.

again
you're ignorance is astounding

you & most fumblers think the VFL is the only sport that has variance in size
but as we all know ...........fumblers are dribblers
end of


http://www.zerotackle.com/nrl/rugby-lea ... -shortest/
half you seen RL half backs & some fullbacks

I never said RL didnt have diversity numb nuts.

sure dickhead

sure

Quoting only parts of my comments doesn't change what I said, it merely makes you look stupid.

my link made you look like a dribbler

but but
I didn't say that ... truly wuely I didn't
:_<> :_<> :_<>

you we're made look like a moron
as you often are on these forums :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

Your link shows the tallest NRL players are 6'6", with 5'6" the shortest

Almost every AFL club would have at least 3 players well over 6'6", some being 6'8" up to 7'. Yet the smallest players in the AFL would be around the same height as smaller players in RL.

so
they're almost exactly the same difference from tallest to shortest
thanks for that

you insinuated only your fumbling crap game has variance in the size of its players
I proved you're a dribbler :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

I claimed AFL has a broader range of body shapes and sizes. Your link proved it.

[/quote]

my link proved the exact opposite you dribbling twat :_<> :_<> :_<>

oh oh oh
we have one 7 foot players & 5'6 players
with many in the range of 6'8 to 5'6


the NRL also has many many players .. 6.6 to 5.6 players >
proving
the VFL is no broader in body types then RL , or any other sport for that matter
also proving
again
you're a dribbler

[Xman]

The tallest NRL players are 5'6", some 3-6 inches shorter than the tallest AFL players. That's highly significant

Also add the fact a number of AFL players are slightly built, because their speed and agility is their greatest asset, not strength.

You're completely wrong, again...

[NRLCrap1]

He failed maths at school, Xman! Isn't it obvious?