AFLCrap that is very interesting eh. True, its unfortunate those who tell the truth get banished to preserve the false image of an organisation.

xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
The pathetic dumb mod bitch doesn't read entire posts. He's acknoweledged it before. Seriously, Xman, you're wasting space on these boards. The mod status is highly amusing.Raiderdave wrote:the last line you blind dickheadXman wrote:Where does it say they are reluctant to recruit based on their race?King-Eliagh wrote:Wow and here I was thinking it was only one racist who made this quote. The last paragraph tells us several clubs have been talking to the AFL about their reluctance to employ aboriginal players. Guess I'm not shocked....
I've coached and played marngrook in central australia. The aboriginal kids throughout the region really love the sport and it shows in their skills. It's sad to see clubs reluctant to recruit based on cultural difference. They really could try harder. The sport could easily have 30 or 40% Aboriginal players IMO. Easily. But the evidence suggests clubs don't wanna go there. Not saying it's all easy but to just bail out? Shameful.
filthy
filthy
racist sport![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
How can I be jealous when you DIDN'T FUCKING DO THAT AT ALL?????King-Eliagh wrote:Hows go get fukked sound crap1? I coached and played there ya jealous dipshit.
Yip Yip .NRLCrap1 wrote:How can I be jealous when you DIDN'T FUCKING DO THAT AT ALL?????King-Eliagh wrote:Hows go get fukked sound crap1? I coached and played there ya jealous dipshit.
I'll bet you've never even seen the Alice!
Yip yip,NRLCrap1 wrote:How can I be jealous when you DIDN'T FUCKING DO THAT AT ALL?????King-Eliagh wrote:Hows go get fukked sound crap1? I coached and played there ya jealous dipshit.
I'll bet you've never even seen the Alice!
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
rubbish.Raiderdave wrote:the last line you blind dickheadXman wrote:Where does it say they are reluctant to recruit based on their race?King-Eliagh wrote:Wow and here I was thinking it was only one racist who made this quote. The last paragraph tells us several clubs have been talking to the AFL about their reluctance to employ aboriginal players. Guess I'm not shocked....
I've coached and played marngrook in central australia. The aboriginal kids throughout the region really love the sport and it shows in their skills. It's sad to see clubs reluctant to recruit based on cultural difference. They really could try harder. The sport could easily have 30 or 40% Aboriginal players IMO. Easily. But the evidence suggests clubs don't wanna go there. Not saying it's all easy but to just bail out? Shameful.
filthy
filthy
racist sport![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/AFL/h ... 6800925130AFLcrap1 wrote:LiesXman wrote:He never actually said it was a ruleAFLcrap1 wrote:Fricking Goose.NRLCrap1 wrote:There's no such fricking rule, Dave!
NEEDED TO BE SAID.
MARK COLVIN: An alleged racism scandal has cost the recruiting manager of the Adelaide Football Club his job.
Matt Rendell resigned this evening after it emerged that he was the unnamed AFL official who reportedly said his club wouldn't draft an Indigenous player unless one of his parents was white.
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2012/s3455391.htm
A RECRUITER for an AFL club has privately admitted to the league that his club would be unlikely to draft an indigenous player unless at least one parent were white.
The recruiter is one of several recently approached by the AFL in response to rumours of unease at some clubs about recruiting indigenous players, and a drop in their numbers on club lists.
Some clubs have told the AFL they are more reluctant than before about recruiting Aboriginal players because they are thought to provide a difficult management issue
http://www.theage.com.au/AFL/AFL-news/a ... 1v8az.html
Here's what Rendell said:"I said as a throwaway line, as a ridiculous line, you might find we only recruit players with one white parent if it's not addressed now," Rendell told the Nine Network's Footy Classified.
"... I've never had a policy like that in my life. I wouldn't have a policy like that, it's ridiculous, silly. Everyone's the same.
"The comment that I made originally was stupidly trying to emphasise the problem that we've got at the moment and we need to do something about it quick and the AFL need to get involved in it."
But carry on with your lies......![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.
get your head outa your arse.
I didn't write the article .
I didn't tell it like it is & then get sacked (like anyone who tells the truth & dares tarnish the "IMAGE" of Fumbleball.
This poor bloke told the truth & copped it ..
But the funny thing is he was right on the Money
as when the DWAFT of the next crop of Stick insects was on ..
This is what happened.
INDIGENOUS participation has been a jewel in the AFL cultural crown but one that is suddenly under serious threat.
And that is sad. Extremely sad, given football offers people of many different backgrounds the chance to to make something of lives that may otherwise amount to little.
It also robs our game of one of its great sights, that of an indigenous player (think Lewis Jetta) running and bouncing with uninhibited freedom, or kicking goals that don't seem possible for the average Joe.
Over the past decade, a healthy 9 per cent of the 840 listed players in 2012 were indigenous. But only three indigenous footballers were selected in last week's national draft, with a super-talented but troubled youngster named Dayle Garlett overlooked.
On ability, Garlett would have been a top 10 certainty, yet concerns over his ability to conform to the rigours of the AFL scared clubs away
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinio ... 6525208981
Nah its all lies ,lies I tell ya.
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
I'm afraid I made it a lil tough for you to understand by using the term culture. In fact that was being nice to the AFL. The clubs are resistant to recruit Aboriginal players, full stopSome clubs have told the AFL they are more reluctant than before about recruiting Aboriginal players because they are thought to provide a difficult management issue
xman wrote:KE, why is an even comp important?
If there was a rule against recruiting indigenous players they wouldn't recruit any.AFLcrap1 wrote:So Xman that makes a grand total of 4 .
Wow just wow.
Doesn't alter the fact that the article shows that they are avoiding recruiting Indigenous players ..
As per the unwritten rule that some clubs live by & sadly a fumble official lost his job for exposing...
you can invite all you want (window dressing ,keep up the IMAGE),but HOW many were actually DRAFTED?.Xman wrote:If there was a rule against recruiting indigenous players they wouldn't recruit any.AFLcrap1 wrote:So Xman that makes a grand total of 4 .
Wow just wow.
Doesn't alter the fact that the article shows that they are avoiding recruiting Indigenous players ..
As per the unwritten rule that some clubs live by & sadly a fumble official lost his job for exposing...
With the National Championships done and dusted and TAC Cup and Colts footy coming to a close, the AFL this afternoon have annoucned a list of 98 draft hopefulls who have been invited to this year’s National Draft Combine in October. 14 of 98 players invited were Indigenous
http://www.scpaige.com.au/2013-national ... announced/
Thanks for coming :_<>
Only 98 were invited. These are invites from AFL clubs for consideration to recruit. Why would they invite players they had no intention of recruiting? This puts a huge hole in your theory, again.AFLcrap1 wrote:you can invite all you want (window dressing ,keep up the IMAGE),but HOW many were actually DRAFTED?.Xman wrote:If there was a rule against recruiting indigenous players they wouldn't recruit any.AFLcrap1 wrote:So Xman that makes a grand total of 4 .
Wow just wow.
Doesn't alter the fact that the article shows that they are avoiding recruiting Indigenous players ..
As per the unwritten rule that some clubs live by & sadly a fumble official lost his job for exposing...
With the National Championships done and dusted and TAC Cup and Colts footy coming to a close, the AFL this afternoon have annoucned a list of 98 draft hopefulls who have been invited to this year’s National Draft Combine in October. 14 of 98 players invited were Indigenous
http://www.scpaige.com.au/2013-national ... announced/
Thanks for coming :_<>
That is what the whole blow up was about .
Not how fucking many were invited ,
BUT
How many were Drafted ..
Thanks for coming.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
My Theory.Xman wrote:Only 98 were invited. These are invites from AFL clubs for consideration to recruit. Why would they invite players they had no intention of recruiting? This puts a huge hole in your theory, again.AFLcrap1 wrote:you can invite all you want (window dressing ,keep up the IMAGE),but HOW many were actually DRAFTED?.Xman wrote:If there was a rule against recruiting indigenous players they wouldn't recruit any.AFLcrap1 wrote:So Xman that makes a grand total of 4 .
Wow just wow.
Doesn't alter the fact that the article shows that they are avoiding recruiting Indigenous players ..
As per the unwritten rule that some clubs live by & sadly a fumble official lost his job for exposing...
With the National Championships done and dusted and TAC Cup and Colts footy coming to a close, the AFL this afternoon have annoucned a list of 98 draft hopefulls who have been invited to this year’s National Draft Combine in October. 14 of 98 players invited were Indigenous
http://www.scpaige.com.au/2013-national ... announced/
Thanks for coming :_<>
That is what the whole blow up was about .
Not how fucking many were invited ,
BUT
How many were Drafted ..
Thanks for coming.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()