RLWC is an insult and a joke

[NRLCrap1]

Crowds don't mean squat, Fyiar! Playing numbers are what counts, and I was telling Dave that it proves that AFL is NOT the tiniest sport on the planet!!

Proof? WIKIPEDIA!! And look at the sources within the articles and not the articles themselves!

[Raiderdave]

Crowds don't mean squat, Fyiar! Playing numbers are what counts, and I was telling Dave that it proves that AFL is NOT the tiniest sport on the planet!!

Proof? WIKIPEDIA!! And look at the sources within the articles and not the articles themselves!

:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

oh dear god
when will this tool pull his melon out of his date

what playing numbers ? >

hardly anyone plays your bumbling crap anywhere on the planet
of the 69 make believe countries who do impersonations of seagulls fighting over the last chip
if 6500 actual club players don singlets & their little sisters shorts ... I'd be surprised

where as
as a comparison .... RL .. a relatively small sport internationally has

75,000 registered club players in England alone
32,000 in NZ
27,000 in France
148,000 in PNG

plus .... our code can fill a stadium of the calibre of Wembley in London for a game between 2 non Australians clubs ... full ... of non Australians
while

the VFL couldn't attract sufficient interest to fill a phone box in the above equivalent :_<> :_<> :_<>

give it away
your code is the tiniest on the planet
embrace your puniness :_<> :_<>

[Raiderdave]

69 countries disagree with you, Dave!

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

prove it.

any crowds to back that claim up?

participants in a tournament means shitall. RL have around 30 countries with recognised teams and another 10 or so vying to be recognised by the RLIF. some didn't make the cut for RLWC 13 (only 14 allowed) but that should be expanded to 16 in 2017.

crowds
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

he even can't provide credible proof of the 69 countries
Wikipedia


any singlet wearing loon can post anything he wants on that site

no
I've got it bang on

the igniting of ones backdoor burps attracts more spectators & interest then this embarrassing Victorian abortion abroad ...

[NRLCrap1]

If you had the balls to go and actually look at Wikipedia and read the sources THEY rely on, you'd be so scared of AFL you'd blow up your basement to avoid the takeover, Dave! :P :P :P :P :P

By the way - not that it matters a huge amount in game development - but the total crowds for AFL (including the AFL itself) would be bigger than the total for RL (including the NRL, but NOT including SOO and RLWC).

I call BS on those registered playing numbers except maybe for PNG.

[Raiderdave]

If you had the balls to go and actually look at Wikipedia and read the sources THEY rely on, you'd be so scared of AFL you'd blow up your basement to avoid the takeover, Dave! :P :P :P :P :P

By the way - not that it matters a huge amount in game development - but the total crowds for AFL (including the AFL itself) would be bigger than the total for RL (including the NRL, but NOT including SOO and RLWC).

I call BS on those registered playing numbers except maybe for PNG.

:_<> :_<> :_<>

lighting bottom burps
a bigger sport internationally then VFL

[pussycat]

World domination comes closer!

South Africa bid for 2017 World Cup

Date
November 30, 2013 - 11:22AM


View more articles from Steve Mascord

South Africa have submitted their bid document for the 2017 World Cup and remain confident of stealing the tournament from under the noses of Australia and New Zealand.

The bid includes a grant of $200,000 to every competing nation, expansion of the World Cup to 16 teams, use of giant stadiums and – possibly – an emerging nations tournament and a $1 million first prize.

"We have answered a few preliminary questions and I am sure they will come back with more," said Chris Botes, the South Africa Rugby League consultant who is in Manchester for the final.

"We are confident we have out together the best bid we can."
Advertisement

Where is the money coming from, you ask? Well, the TV rights deal the Rugby League International Federation did with management company IMG is worth 100 million rand ($10,760,000), says Botes, and it's a slice of that pie that the bid is chasing.




In [local] news . The AFL are fighting a losing battle in there attempt to cross the Murray!

[Swans4ever]

69 countries disagree with you, Dave!

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

prove it.

any crowds to back that claim up?

participants in a tournament means shitall. RL have around 30 countries with recognised teams and another 10 or so vying to be recognised by the RLIF. some didn't make the cut for RLWC 13 (only 14 allowed) but that should be expanded to 16 in 2017.

crowds
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

he even can't provide credible proof of the 69 countries
Wikipedia


any singlet wearing loon can post anything he wants on that site

no
I've got it bang on

the igniting of ones backdoor burps attracts more spectators & interest then this embarrassing Victorian abortion abroad ...

Again another reference which has homosexual overtones - yes it's aparent now you DESPISE the AFL and are so full of rage and confusion as you are fighting your homosexual tendencies. RD stop fighting and come out of the closet.

[NRLCrap1]

If you had the balls to go and actually look at Wikipedia and read the sources THEY rely on, you'd be so scared of AFL you'd blow up your basement to avoid the takeover, Dave! :P :P :P :P :P

By the way - not that it matters a huge amount in game development - but the total crowds for AFL (including the AFL itself) would be bigger than the total for RL (including the NRL, but NOT including SOO and RLWC).

I call BS on those registered playing numbers except maybe for PNG.

:_<> :_<> :_<>

lighting bottom burps
a bigger sport internationally then VFL

So lighting bottom burps is a sport in 71 countries? You goose.

[Raiderdave]

If you had the balls to go and actually look at Wikipedia and read the sources THEY rely on, you'd be so scared of AFL you'd blow up your basement to avoid the takeover, Dave! :P :P :P :P :P

By the way - not that it matters a huge amount in game development - but the total crowds for AFL (including the AFL itself) would be bigger than the total for RL (including the NRL, but NOT including SOO and RLWC).

I call BS on those registered playing numbers except maybe for PNG.

:_<> :_<> :_<>

lighting bottom burps
a bigger sport internationally then VFL

So lighting bottom burps is a sport in 71 countries? You goose.

absolutely dickhead

[Raiderdave]

69 countries disagree with you, Dave!

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

prove it.

any crowds to back that claim up?

participants in a tournament means shitall. RL have around 30 countries with recognised teams and another 10 or so vying to be recognised by the RLIF. some didn't make the cut for RLWC 13 (only 14 allowed) but that should be expanded to 16 in 2017.

crowds
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

he even can't provide credible proof of the 69 countries
Wikipedia


any singlet wearing loon can post anything he wants on that site

no
I've got it bang on

the igniting of ones backdoor burps attracts more spectators & interest then this embarrassing Victorian abortion abroad ...

- yes it's aparent now you DESPISE the AFL

no
Im full of despise apparently >

whateva the fuck that is :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

you seem a bit off yr game today
go whack a white sheet on & a nice hood with some eye holes
burn a few crosses & knock back a few coldies

& you'll be your old self in no time twat

[Swans4ever]

69 countries disagree with you, Dave!

Tell you what - have the courage to come down to Melbourne for the 2014 International Cup and you'll see true International interest!

If you have the guts that is........

prove it.

any crowds to back that claim up?

participants in a tournament means shitall. RL have around 30 countries with recognised teams and another 10 or so vying to be recognised by the RLIF. some didn't make the cut for RLWC 13 (only 14 allowed) but that should be expanded to 16 in 2017.

crowds
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

he even can't provide credible proof of the 69 countries
Wikipedia


any singlet wearing loon can post anything he wants on that site

no
I've got it bang on

the igniting of ones backdoor burps attracts more spectators & interest then this embarrassing Victorian abortion abroad ...

- yes it's aparent now you DESPISE the AFL

no
Im full of despise apparently >

whateva the fuck that is :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

you seem a bit off yr game today
go whack a white sheet on & a nice hood with some eye holes
burn a few crosses & knock back a few coldies

& you'll be your old self in no time twat

Obviously very hurt right now arn't you RD, the realisation that others know now is really really hurting - no ones judging you RD - I know your making up anything you can to shift focus because it is hurting! So come on RD come out of the closet and the pain, anger and confusion can end!

[Fred]

Whether someone is gay or not I don't think should be a point of discussion. If someone chooses to hide their homosexuality that's their business, even if they shield it with homophobic remark. If people are trying to put someone down by calling them gay then that is offensive ... Just as associating something with being gay to put that something down is offensive (gay fl for example). So I ask that ones sexuality not be called into question or be part of any debate !!

[Swans4ever]

Whether someone is gay or not I don't think should be a point of discussion. If someone chooses to hide their homosexuality that's their business, even if they shield it with homophobic remark. If people are trying to put someone down by calling them gay then that is offensive ... Just as associating something with being gay to put that something down is offensive (gay fl for example). So I ask that ones sexuality not be called into question or be part of any debate !!

I'm fine with that but I think people should also refrain from posting that they put their penise in another posters mouth as RD did!

Phelpsy wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
So how much money did the Canberra Raiders Football club make this year? Or last year or the last ten yrs - thats right folks every year they get 3 mil hand out from the parent hotel group - the Raiders ALWAYS run at a loss! Be about 18 mil easy over the same 6 yrs! Bit of the ol pot calling the kettle eh RD - by the way
2013 - 1.5
2012 - 2.5
2011 - 1.855
2010 - 2.476
2009 - 0.603k
2008 - 2.2 mil

Is approx 11 mil last time I looked not 16 mil but obviously have to factor in RD inflation!



not a link in sight from this lying sack of shit ......

its a lot more then 11 you illiterate tool
& as for the Raiders

they don't have a parent group you ***** fuckhead
they ARE the parent group of all the other groups

& how'd they do in 2013 shit for brains
bout the same as the 2 years before this one

another 3 Million dollar plus profit
so that's about 10 Million for the last 3 .................


gee
wouldn't the kitty kats like a business like that




http://www.raidersclub.com.au/site/file ... 199982.pdf
Raiders
The Raiders club has the support of a string of leagues clubs in the ACT and Queanbeyan housing more than 800 poker machines. The powerhouse of the group is the Queanbeyan Leagues Club, which has been instrumental in forming a property trust with more than $30 million worth of assets. The club has been able to fund the trust and retain a healthy balance sheet of its own. Profits from this trust can be distributed to the football club. This should see the Raiders football team continue to prosper in the coming years even though it is unsure how much debt is attached to the property portfolio.
The Raiders football team has generated around $12-$13 million of revenue in recent years, making it one of the poorest-performing in the competition. This effectively means the football club is uneconomic and demands several million dollars from the leagues club and property trust for support each year. With no competition for funds in the nation's capital, this should stand the football club in good stead for some years to come.
http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league ... 2swhv.html

I have already explained this to you in the past but your tooooo stupid to understand - the Canberra Raiders football club is its OWN legal identity - The Canberra Raiders sports club LTD is a separate group that DONATES money to the football club AS they are separate LEGAL IDENTITIES! The football club is gifted money each year to balance the books AS IT RUNS AT A LOSS! Otherwise they would announce a profit - As they ARE NOT PUBLIC COMPANIES the football club DOES NOT put out annual reports! You are TOOOOOO STUPID for words - again the Lions losses over 6 yrs is 11 million - now admit you lied about 16 million!





best you don't lie.. & make stuff up .. re shit you know nothing about
which it would appear is well .....just about everything

your attempt at explaining the ownership model of the Raiders is one of your worst efforts to date
&
that's saying something
a ****** with his head up his arse could do better

the Raiders RLFC own the Raiders group who run everything else non football related within the company
from an ever growing property port folio ... to its 10 licensed clubs
to the land & the facilities on them plus all the equipment at the 3 sports ovals it owns at Braddon , Bruce & Holt


the Football club owns every cent in profits the entire group makes
&

its made plenty in the last few years
I know this makes you look like an ignorant cock

but hey
if the shoe fits


Again you just show your absolute ignorance - they are SEPARATE LEGAL IDENTITIES -!



who are we gunna believe
a singlet wearing shit for brains fumbling wombat who's been proven to be wrong with just about everything hes posted on these pages ... including most of his spelling


or moi
whos never wrong about most things he posts ... & certainly the ownership model of the football team he follows in HIS home town


so again
you ignorant cockhead ... they are nothing of the sort
they are the same entity
the same organisation
run by the same board ...

every cent of profit made anywhere within the group .... is owned by the Canberra Raiders Rugby League Football club
this group turned over nearly 67 Million dollars in 2013
& recorded net profits in excess of 3 Million dollars

making the financial performance of many fumble bumble teams .... pale into insignificance



Dave, wow... Is that really your perception of yourself ... That you are never wrong and never make things up ??? That's interesting ... As that seems to be the complete opposite of how most, if not everyone on this forum sees you. Including rl supporters ? Why do you think this gulf exists between how others see you and how you see you ?



ahhhh
you mean fumblers


as If I'd give a fuck about what those deluded bubble dwelling ********* think


as for RL supporters
well
Brandz & I had a run in or 2 .... he couldn't string 2 sentences together without shoving a fumblers tiny dick in his mouth & I sorted him out
&
hes gone

Raider
slammin fumblers like its free

This is something that should not be tolerated - clearly homophobic and should have to apologise otherwise He has brought his own sexuality into the spot light!

[Raiderdave]

Whether someone is gay or not I don't think should be a point of discussion. If someone chooses to hide their homosexuality that's their business, even if they shield it with homophobic remark. If people are trying to put someone down by calling them gay then that is offensive ... Just as associating something with being gay to put that something down is offensive (gay fl for example). So I ask that ones sexuality not be called into question or be part of any debate !!

I'm fine with that but I think people should also refrain from posting that they put their penise in another posters mouth as RD did!

Phelpsy wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
So how much money did the Canberra Raiders Football club make this year? Or last year or the last ten yrs - thats right folks every year they get 3 mil hand out from the parent hotel group - the Raiders ALWAYS run at a loss! Be about 18 mil easy over the same 6 yrs! Bit of the ol pot calling the kettle eh RD - by the way
2013 - 1.5
2012 - 2.5
2011 - 1.855
2010 - 2.476
2009 - 0.603k
2008 - 2.2 mil

Is approx 11 mil last time I looked not 16 mil but obviously have to factor in RD inflation!



not a link in sight from this lying sack of shit ......

its a lot more then 11 you illiterate tool
& as for the Raiders

they don't have a parent group you ***** fuckhead
they ARE the parent group of all the other groups

& how'd they do in 2013 shit for brains
bout the same as the 2 years before this one

another 3 Million dollar plus profit
so that's about 10 Million for the last 3 .................


gee
wouldn't the kitty kats like a business like that




http://www.raidersclub.com.au/site/file ... 199982.pdf
Raiders
The Raiders club has the support of a string of leagues clubs in the ACT and Queanbeyan housing more than 800 poker machines. The powerhouse of the group is the Queanbeyan Leagues Club, which has been instrumental in forming a property trust with more than $30 million worth of assets. The club has been able to fund the trust and retain a healthy balance sheet of its own. Profits from this trust can be distributed to the football club. This should see the Raiders football team continue to prosper in the coming years even though it is unsure how much debt is attached to the property portfolio.
The Raiders football team has generated around $12-$13 million of revenue in recent years, making it one of the poorest-performing in the competition. This effectively means the football club is uneconomic and demands several million dollars from the leagues club and property trust for support each year. With no competition for funds in the nation's capital, this should stand the football club in good stead for some years to come.
http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league ... 2swhv.html

I have already explained this to you in the past but your tooooo stupid to understand - the Canberra Raiders football club is its OWN legal identity - The Canberra Raiders sports club LTD is a separate group that DONATES money to the football club AS they are separate LEGAL IDENTITIES! The football club is gifted money each year to balance the books AS IT RUNS AT A LOSS! Otherwise they would announce a profit - As they ARE NOT PUBLIC COMPANIES the football club DOES NOT put out annual reports! You are TOOOOOO STUPID for words - again the Lions losses over 6 yrs is 11 million - now admit you lied about 16 million!





best you don't lie.. & make stuff up .. re shit you know nothing about
which it would appear is well .....just about everything

your attempt at explaining the ownership model of the Raiders is one of your worst efforts to date
&
that's saying something
a ****** with his head up his arse could do better

the Raiders RLFC own the Raiders group who run everything else non football related within the company
from an ever growing property port folio ... to its 10 licensed clubs
to the land & the facilities on them plus all the equipment at the 3 sports ovals it owns at Braddon , Bruce & Holt


the Football club owns every cent in profits the entire group makes
&

its made plenty in the last few years
I know this makes you look like an ignorant cock

but hey
if the shoe fits


Again you just show your absolute ignorance - they are SEPARATE LEGAL IDENTITIES -!



who are we gunna believe
a singlet wearing shit for brains fumbling wombat who's been proven to be wrong with just about everything hes posted on these pages ... including most of his spelling


or moi
whos never wrong about most things he posts ... & certainly the ownership model of the football team he follows in HIS home town


so again
you ignorant cockhead ... they are nothing of the sort
they are the same entity
the same organisation
run by the same board ...

every cent of profit made anywhere within the group .... is owned by the Canberra Raiders Rugby League Football club
this group turned over nearly 67 Million dollars in 2013
& recorded net profits in excess of 3 Million dollars

making the financial performance of many fumble bumble teams .... pale into insignificance



Dave, wow... Is that really your perception of yourself ... That you are never wrong and never make things up ??? That's interesting ... As that seems to be the complete opposite of how most, if not everyone on this forum sees you. Including rl supporters ? Why do you think this gulf exists between how others see you and how you see you ?



ahhhh
you mean fumblers


as If I'd give a fuck about what those deluded bubble dwelling ********* think


as for RL supporters
well
Brandz & I had a run in or 2 .... he couldn't string 2 sentences together without shoving a fumblers tiny dick in his mouth & I sorted him out
&
hes gone

Raider
slammin fumblers like its free

This is something that should not be tolerated - clearly homophobic and should have to apologise otherwise He has brought his own sexuality into the spot light!

but but but ... :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

even fumblers think you're a cockhead

[Swans4ever]

Whether someone is gay or not I don't think should be a point of discussion. If someone chooses to hide their homosexuality that's their business, even if they shield it with homophobic remark. If people are trying to put someone down by calling them gay then that is offensive ... Just as associating something with being gay to put that something down is offensive (gay fl for example). So I ask that ones sexuality not be called into question or be part of any debate !!

I'm fine with that but I think people should also refrain from posting that they put their penise in another posters mouth as RD did!

Phelpsy wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
Raiderdave wrote:
Swans4ever wrote:
So how much money did the Canberra Raiders Football club make this year? Or last year or the last ten yrs - thats right folks every year they get 3 mil hand out from the parent hotel group - the Raiders ALWAYS run at a loss! Be about 18 mil easy over the same 6 yrs! Bit of the ol pot calling the kettle eh RD - by the way
2013 - 1.5
2012 - 2.5
2011 - 1.855
2010 - 2.476
2009 - 0.603k
2008 - 2.2 mil

Is approx 11 mil last time I looked not 16 mil but obviously have to factor in RD inflation!



not a link in sight from this lying sack of shit ......

its a lot more then 11 you illiterate tool
& as for the Raiders

they don't have a parent group you ***** fuckhead
they ARE the parent group of all the other groups

& how'd they do in 2013 shit for brains
bout the same as the 2 years before this one

another 3 Million dollar plus profit
so that's about 10 Million for the last 3 .................


gee
wouldn't the kitty kats like a business like that




http://www.raidersclub.com.au/site/file ... 199982.pdf
Raiders
The Raiders club has the support of a string of leagues clubs in the ACT and Queanbeyan housing more than 800 poker machines. The powerhouse of the group is the Queanbeyan Leagues Club, which has been instrumental in forming a property trust with more than $30 million worth of assets. The club has been able to fund the trust and retain a healthy balance sheet of its own. Profits from this trust can be distributed to the football club. This should see the Raiders football team continue to prosper in the coming years even though it is unsure how much debt is attached to the property portfolio.
The Raiders football team has generated around $12-$13 million of revenue in recent years, making it one of the poorest-performing in the competition. This effectively means the football club is uneconomic and demands several million dollars from the leagues club and property trust for support each year. With no competition for funds in the nation's capital, this should stand the football club in good stead for some years to come.
http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league ... 2swhv.html

I have already explained this to you in the past but your tooooo stupid to understand - the Canberra Raiders football club is its OWN legal identity - The Canberra Raiders sports club LTD is a separate group that DONATES money to the football club AS they are separate LEGAL IDENTITIES! The football club is gifted money each year to balance the books AS IT RUNS AT A LOSS! Otherwise they would announce a profit - As they ARE NOT PUBLIC COMPANIES the football club DOES NOT put out annual reports! You are TOOOOOO STUPID for words - again the Lions losses over 6 yrs is 11 million - now admit you lied about 16 million!





best you don't lie.. & make stuff up .. re shit you know nothing about
which it would appear is well .....just about everything

your attempt at explaining the ownership model of the Raiders is one of your worst efforts to date
&
that's saying something
a ****** with his head up his arse could do better

the Raiders RLFC own the Raiders group who run everything else non football related within the company
from an ever growing property port folio ... to its 10 licensed clubs
to the land & the facilities on them plus all the equipment at the 3 sports ovals it owns at Braddon , Bruce & Holt


the Football club owns every cent in profits the entire group makes
&

its made plenty in the last few years
I know this makes you look like an ignorant cock

but hey
if the shoe fits


Again you just show your absolute ignorance - they are SEPARATE LEGAL IDENTITIES -!



who are we gunna believe
a singlet wearing shit for brains fumbling wombat who's been proven to be wrong with just about everything hes posted on these pages ... including most of his spelling


or moi
whos never wrong about most things he posts ... & certainly the ownership model of the football team he follows in HIS home town


so again
you ignorant cockhead ... they are nothing of the sort
they are the same entity
the same organisation
run by the same board ...

every cent of profit made anywhere within the group .... is owned by the Canberra Raiders Rugby League Football club
this group turned over nearly 67 Million dollars in 2013
& recorded net profits in excess of 3 Million dollars

making the financial performance of many fumble bumble teams .... pale into insignificance



Dave, wow... Is that really your perception of yourself ... That you are never wrong and never make things up ??? That's interesting ... As that seems to be the complete opposite of how most, if not everyone on this forum sees you. Including rl supporters ? Why do you think this gulf exists between how others see you and how you see you ?



ahhhh
you mean fumblers


as If I'd give a fuck about what those deluded bubble dwelling ********* think


as for RL supporters
well
Brandz & I had a run in or 2 .... he couldn't string 2 sentences together without shoving a fumblers tiny dick in his mouth & I sorted him out
&
hes gone

Raider
slammin fumblers like its free

This is something that should not be tolerated - clearly homophobic and should have to apologise otherwise He has brought his own sexuality into the spot light!

but but but ... :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>

even fumblers think you're a cockhead

Yeah ok .....whatever didn't know we're posting on a popularity test?????? Don't care......but you should about all that anger and hate! Hahaha lol :_<> :_<> :_<>