Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
hey wow, on the right hand side it is cut off but clearly it says "rugby league" and lists their pool below it. that's even more amazing! i thought it was just a headline on the news reel but i think they are actually discussing it. Even if theyre not it doesnt matter, 1/4 of the screen dedicated to RL on USA national TV.
we told you excitement would build ahead of their clash with Oz.
you can yawn all you want, but then again i guess ignorance is bliss.
we told you excitement would build ahead of their clash with Oz.
you can yawn all you want, but then again i guess ignorance is bliss.
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
Wait till they find out all the players are Australian!ParraEelsNRL wrote:Just seen this pic posted at the raah from one of their big fox sports news show.
Small steps eh?
:D
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
-
- Coach
- Posts: 9495
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:52 am
- Team: Parramatta
- Location: Rugby League Heartland
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
pHyR3 wrote:hey wow, on the right hand side it is cut off but clearly it says "rugby league" and lists their pool below it. that's even more amazing! i thought it was just a headline on the news reel but i think they are actually discussing it. Even if theyre not it doesnt matter, 1/4 of the screen dedicated to RL on USA national TV.
we told you excitement would build ahead of their clash with Oz.
you can yawn all you want, but then again i guess ignorance is bliss.
Yeah the fella who posted it said they were talking about it.
signature removed by Admin.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
User has been banned for this and similar comments.
-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Yeah that'll grow the game



LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
Agree, that's not a good look for a WCSwans4ever wrote:SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game![]()
![]()
:_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!Raiderdave wrote:this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
it is almost as pathetic
as it is hilarious![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
DON'T MAKE ANY BETS WITH ELIAGH!! HE WELCHES WHEN HE LOSES!!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ?Xman wrote:Agree, that's not a good look for a WCSwans4ever wrote:SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game![]()
![]()
:_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>




New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04
Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24
England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02
New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15
New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14
RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
No better. What's your point?Raiderdave wrote:how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ?Xman wrote:Agree, that's not a good look for a WCSwans4ever wrote:SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game![]()
![]()
:_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04
Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24
England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02
New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15
New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14

King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
NRLCrap1 wrote:What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!Raiderdave wrote:this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
it is almost as pathetic
as it is hilarious![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
& yet

in everyone of these places ...... these people are considered more interesting then your bumbling crap sport






that sorta puts it in perspective don't ya think fuckhead

RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

- Raiderdave
- Coach
- Posts: 16683
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm
- Team: Canberra
- Location:
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
well its maybe ... big scores occur in many world cups & they don't seem to be concerned about it being a bad lookXman wrote:No better. What's your point?Raiderdave wrote:how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ?Xman wrote:Agree, that's not a good look for a WCSwans4ever wrote:SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game![]()
![]()
:_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04
Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24
England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02
New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15
New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14>
big nations
& minnows play in world cups
maybe when you lot get to have a proper one .... you'll see





RL SOO II 4.194 Million veiwers
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K
RL SOO I 4.068 Million
NRL GF 3.968 Million
VFL Grand Final 3.620 Million
SOO III 3.364 Million
NRL Prelim 2.219 Million
Kangaroos V NZ 1.214 Million
Sookerwhos V Japan 238K

-
- Coach
- Posts: 5933
- Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 8:52 pm
- Team: Sydney Swans
- Location:
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!

Yeah and only ONE of those sides are playing in the RLWC!Raiderdave wrote:how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ?Xman wrote:Agree, that's not a good look for a WCSwans4ever wrote:SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game![]()
![]()
:_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04
Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24
England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02
New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15
New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14
LARGEST MEMBERSHIP, LARGEST PROFIT, LARGEST HOME CROWD AVERAGE - THE BIGGEST CLUB IN SYDNEY - THE SYDNEY SWANS
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
No it doesn't because AFL beats them in the ratings everywhere in Australia, and probably in NZ, PNG and Nauru as well!Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!Raiderdave wrote:this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
it is almost as pathetic
as it is hilarious![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
& yet![]()
in everyone of these places ...... these people are considered more interesting then your bumbling crap sport![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
that sorta puts it in perspective don't ya think fuckhead
DON'T MAKE ANY BETS WITH ELIAGH!! HE WELCHES WHEN HE LOSES!!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
DAVE'S RIVER IN EGYPT - JUNIOR ACT TEAMS: AFL 109 RL 107
CHEWBACCA IS A GOOSE! A GOOSE I TELL YOU! A GOOSE!
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
He has to be a RL troll trying to make derpball fans look dumber than usual(a very big ask)NRLCrap1 wrote:No it doesn't because AFL beats them in the ratings everywhere in Australia, and probably in NZ, PNG and Nauru as well!Raiderdave wrote:NRLCrap1 wrote:What's pathetic, Dave, is your ignorance of AFL in 69 countries outside of Australia, and your ignorance of AFL in (not including Sydney, Brisbane, the Gold Coast and the clubs below the Barassi line) Nowra, Wollongong, Goulburn, Orange, Bathurst, Dubbo, Cowra, Newcastle, Gosford, Port Macquarie, Coffs Harbour, Grafton, Tamworth, Gunnedah, Armidale, Muswellbrook, Inverell, Lismore, Ballina, Byron Bay, Toowoomba, Warwick, Dalby, Maroochydore, Hervey Bay, Bundaberg, Gladstone, Rockhampton, Yeppoon, Mackay, Townsvile, Cairns and Mount Isa!!Raiderdave wrote:this silly little Victorian oddity's demented brain washed fans wouldn't think twice about slaughtering the population of a day care centre if their queer lil sport could get attention like this
as they are so starved of any credible profile away from this Country .. hell
half of the only country on earth their crap sport is played couldn't give a flying fuck![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
it is almost as pathetic
as it is hilarious![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
& yet![]()
in everyone of these places ...... these people are considered more interesting then your bumbling crap sport![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
that sorta puts it in perspective don't ya think fuckhead
No one is this dumb ,has to be trolling.
TLPG
liar extraordinaire
You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.

I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.

You should thank me for publishing your IP
and I never published any actual IP. That's it.
I was a mod at the time .
Xman wrote
I also gave them to TLPG believing he was still a mod.I admit I made a mistake.


Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
I suppose it depends how deep into the tournament these one sided games occurRaiderdave wrote:well its maybe ... big scores occur in many world cups & they don't seem to be concerned about it being a bad lookXman wrote:No better. What's your point?Raiderdave wrote:how'd these scores look for the rugby world cup then dickhead ?Xman wrote:Agree, that's not a good look for a WCSwans4ever wrote:SO I WONDER IF THEIR TALKING ABOUT THEIR 62 - 0 thrashing - the HIGHEST LOSING MARGIN IN THE COMPETITION - hahaha
Yeah that'll grow the game![]()
![]()
:_<> =D> =D> =D> =D>
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<>
New Zealand Japan 145–17 1995-06-04
Australia Namibia 142–0 2003-10-24
England Uruguay 111–13 2003-11-02
New Zealand Portugal 108–13 2007-09-15
New Zealand Italy 101–3 1999-10-14>
big nations
& minnows play in world cups
maybe when you lot get to have a proper one .... you'll see![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
:_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<> :_<>
King-Eliagh: ...I believe [RL] is popular in all the other states and territories, bar tasmania.
Re: Selection criteria for RLWC is pure and simple a joke!
that's true, i expect the semis to be competitive. but hey, blowouts can happen at any time. Like the NRL GF a few years ago 40-0 manly vs storm from memory.
the RLWC is about promoting the game internationally which will result in increased funding, a nice 5-10 mil profit, and more awareness/participation, ESPECIALLY in europe which is where it's focused. The next frontier for RL must be NZ and France. Another French team in the SL and another NRL team in NZ within 10 years. The U20s warriors side is overflowing with talent, they've won the comp twice in i think 5 or 6 years (only started a few years ago) and made the GF this year too.
Then we can focus on expanding further into Europe and America maybe with a RLWC in Canada/USA in 10-20 years.
the RLWC is about promoting the game internationally which will result in increased funding, a nice 5-10 mil profit, and more awareness/participation, ESPECIALLY in europe which is where it's focused. The next frontier for RL must be NZ and France. Another French team in the SL and another NRL team in NZ within 10 years. The U20s warriors side is overflowing with talent, they've won the comp twice in i think 5 or 6 years (only started a few years ago) and made the GF this year too.
Then we can focus on expanding further into Europe and America maybe with a RLWC in Canada/USA in 10-20 years.
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.