National TV exposure, growing crowds, merchandise sales going through the roof, yep, RL is going pretty bad isn't it, almost as invisible as the pretend Vfl comps outside of Australia eh






cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:This is the post para has a problem with.cos789 wrote:This a no brainer as well.
Which is surprising considering the fuss rl types make over how well they're doing there.
The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website.
http://www.usarugbyleague.com/
Compare this to the USAFL website.
They have 36 clubs listed. Of these a large number run their own metro leagues for an extra 38 teams.
Also there are womens clubs and recreational football and a small junior program.
http://www.usafl.com/
Does he have a problem with "The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website."
As the information on websites does change. I re-visited the website and indeed it has changed.
The USARL seems to have only 5 teams on their website.
hey paraeelgonetotallywest.
I'm not lying.
There were 8 teams and now there is only 5
cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:This is the post para has a problem with.cos789 wrote:This a no brainer as well.
Which is surprising considering the fuss rl types make over how well they're doing there.
The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website.
http://www.usarugbyleague.com/
Compare this to the USAFL website.
They have 36 clubs listed. Of these a large number run their own metro leagues for an extra 38 teams.
Also there are womens clubs and recreational football and a small junior program.
http://www.usafl.com/
Does he have a problem with "The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website."
As the information on websites does change. I re-visited the website and indeed it has changed.
The USARL seems to have only 5 teams on their website.
hey paraeelgonetotallywest.
I'm not lying.
There were 8 teams and now there is only 5
Where have I lied parafeelgonetotallywest ? Huh? put up or shut up
cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:This is the post para has a problem with.cos789 wrote:This a no brainer as well.
Which is surprising considering the fuss rl types make over how well they're doing there.
The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website.
http://www.usarugbyleague.com/
Compare this to the USAFL website.
They have 36 clubs listed. Of these a large number run their own metro leagues for an extra 38 teams.
Also there are womens clubs and recreational football and a small junior program.
http://www.usafl.com/
Does he have a problem with "The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website."
As the information on websites does change. I re-visited the website and indeed it has changed.
The USARL seems to have only 5 teams on their website.
hey paraeelgonetotallywest.
I'm not lying.
There were 8 teams and now there is only 5
Where have I lied parafeelgonetotallywest ? Huh? put up or shut up
I haven't lied para_feels_for_end_of_rl so I win when you have to resort to slandercos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:cos789 wrote:This is the post para has a problem with.cos789 wrote:This a no brainer as well.
Which is surprising considering the fuss rl types make over how well they're doing there.
The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website.
http://www.usarugbyleague.com/
Compare this to the USAFL website.
They have 36 clubs listed. Of these a large number run their own metro leagues for an extra 38 teams.
Also there are womens clubs and recreational football and a small junior program.
http://www.usafl.com/
Does he have a problem with "The USARL seems to have only 8 teams on their website."
As the information on websites does change. I re-visited the website and indeed it has changed.
The USARL seems to have only 5 teams on their website.
hey paraeelgonetotallywest.
I'm not lying.
There were 8 teams and now there is only 5
Where have I lied parafeelgonetotallywest ? Huh? put up or shut up
Where have I lied parafeelgonetotallywest ? Huh? Where? put up or shut up
Yes, you poor pathetic thing, pack it it and go back to your home brew.ParraEelsNRL wrote:I have lied and slandered you,
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.
NRLCrap1 wrote:Ignorant goose. International AFL is big and don't you forget it!
the stupidity....NRLCrap1 wrote:Crowds don't mean squat.
Our game was invented here not in England - so expansion OS has only been as recent as ESPN showing games late at night into US - however RL has always had the advantage of RU (a game with many basic similarities) being played world wide - a better test would be since these crowds have participation gone up, do they have more clubs? If not then it may be just novelty and nothing more!pHyR3 wrote:In January 2006, an AFL promotional pre-season match was played in Los Angeles at UCLA between the Kangaroos and league premiers the Sydney Swans, it attracted a crowd of 3,200.
HAHAHA, nice work fumblers. NRL got what, 15k to a few exhibition matches? Hell we got 40k to a game in france and 25k in RUSSIA. lollll so cute when fumblers think they have a presence outside of Australia, "OMG numbers grew 1000% we have 9 people playing now, 1 last year :D