wow
just wow
1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it

Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.Raiderdave wrote:=D> =D> =D> =D>
wow
just wow
1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it
4 f wit ...piesman2011 wrote:Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.Raiderdave wrote:=D> =D> =D> =D>
wow
just wow
1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it
I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure I said we were 2500 people a week in front of last years weekly average (2012) But I was also posting RD style (ie wow just wow ) so it was a surprise to me when you took it seriously, i certainly wasn't being real serious. I guess you are immune to satire (do you have aspbergers).Raiderdave wrote:4 f wit ...piesman2011 wrote:Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.Raiderdave wrote:=D> =D> =D> =D>
wow
just wow
1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it
funny![]()
that argument seemed fine for you cockheads when you lot proclaimed the highest total ever for 4 rounds
that figure being achieved only as a result of 4 extra games ??
tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the hypocrisy
the rampant hypocrisy![]()
![]()
I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickheadpiesman2011 wrote:I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure I said we were 2500 people a week in front of last years weekly average (2012) But I was also posting RD style (ie wow just wow ) so it was a surprise to me when you took it seriously, i certainly wasn't being real serious. I guess you are immune to satire (do you have aspbergers).Raiderdave wrote:4 f wit ...piesman2011 wrote:Oh so the NRL is up 65000 having played 5 more games this year compared to last year. I think you might be trying to juke those stats again RD.Raiderdave wrote:=D> =D> =D> =D>
wow
just wow
1,508,320 for 2013 so far
1,443,540 for this time last year
makes that measly 2500 for the VFL look sick don't it
funny![]()
that argument seemed fine for you cockheads when you lot proclaimed the highest total ever for 4 rounds
that figure being achieved only as a result of 4 extra games ??
tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
the hypocrisy
the rampant hypocrisy![]()
![]()
![]()
The real figures are that the AFL will be up at the end of the year some where between 1500-2500 a week on average ( up from 31500 to between 33,000 and 34,000) while the NRL will be about the same as last year eg around the 16500. Love your spin though. Pretending that your results have improved from last year.
Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout
I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickhead [/quote]piesman2011 wrote:
I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure
Caught out again mate, or maybe you don't read you own posts.Raiderdave wrote:tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?![]()
Ah yes you didpiesman2011 wrote:I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickheadpiesman2011 wrote:
I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure
Caught out again mate, or maybe you don't read you own posts.Raiderdave wrote:tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?![]()
the only one caught out.. is you cockheadRaiderdave wrote:Ah yes you didpiesman2011 wrote:I never said that either if you cared to read for once in yr life dickheadpiesman2011 wrote:
I think you are confused i never said we were 2500 in front of the 2010 figure
Caught out again mate, or maybe you don't read you own posts.Raiderdave wrote:tell me
would yuz be 2500 ahead of the 2010 figure ... with .... 9 less games ?![]()