Raiderdave wrote:actually
fuck that
Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...
I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose
a lot
they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities

Raiderdave wrote:actually
fuck that
Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...
I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose
a lot
they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities

Raiderdave wrote:perception is reality
Drac wrote:Raiderdave wrote:actually
fuck that
Vicky kicky fans welch on bets like cockless sheilas...
I'm yet to see one honour a lost bet
& they lose
a lot
they have no honour
they cannot be trusted .... being slime bags is one of their better qualities


why wasn't it 35K like the Telecrap said it was going to be ?Swans4ever wrote:Hey fucktards Swans got 31k in a stadium that holds 34k, now Raiderdave are you gunna pounce now? I thought you said if it was 5k less than 35k you'd pounce, you are such an assbandit, and slimy of west, how's it feel RL hart land is being embarrassed by WSW (no I don't follow soccer) Just makes me laugh your sorry worried by AF the round ball is stealing your hartland. You guys should worry about the real enemy, while AF will just keeping going along doing its thing!

Phelpsy wrote:Dave, do really think the swans get poor crowds ? Sure they may go up and down , but to draw 31000 is a place like Sydney where nrl is the main game, surely shows at least a niche market for the swans? Surely? The nrl would love the storm to get these types of crowds surely ?
And please I don't want to get into some inane arguement, and I won't , about decline and averages. It's a good crowd. Why do you try and find the negative all the time, it seems that if the swans had every seat filled you would try and find some reason to say this was bad. I'm not sure what the swans have to do for you to say "that's pretty good" , i am guessing there would be nothing. Maybe don't look at it as either /or re nrl and AFL, maybe nrl can be the dominant code in Sydney and swans can have a goods presence as we with a decent following ? Anyway, I think 31000 is a good crowd in a town where attending games is not part if the culture and also where nrl is the dominant sport .

Raiderdave wrote:
7K is a tremendous turnout


based on their pastPhelpsy wrote:It's a good crowd though wouldn't you agree ?

Stewie wrote:They'll be back up next year when the SCG is completed and they can sell more GA tickets to the public.
31k is almost double the average NRL crowd, but poor.....nice self ownage Dave!Raiderdave wrote:based on their pastPhelpsy wrote:It's a good crowd though wouldn't you agree ?
no
its not ...
Raiderdave wrote:perception is reality